Assessment of Educational Service Quality Gap: The Students’ Perspectives

M. Alijanzadeh, Hamed Fattahi, F. Veisi, Bahram Alizadeh, Zeinab Khedmatgozar, S. Gholami
{"title":"Assessment of Educational Service Quality Gap: The Students’ Perspectives","authors":"M. Alijanzadeh, Hamed Fattahi, F. Veisi, Bahram Alizadeh, Zeinab Khedmatgozar, S. Gholami","doi":"10.5812/erms.80246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Noonecandenytheimportanceof educationalservicesandtheroleitplaysinattainingsocialgoals. Propertraining and students’ satisfaction leads to system promotion and finally social development. This study aimed to evaluate the educational service quality in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS). Methods: Thiscross-sectionalstudywasconductedin2014among327studentsofQUMSwhowereselectedthroughsimplerandom sampling. The most significant variables were tangibility, assurance, empathy, reliability, and accountability of the educational service quality. The data were collected using the 27 - item SERVQUAL questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha score ( α = 0.88) and test retest (R = 0.83) method were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: Theaverageageof thestudentswas22.2 ± 3.1years. Thequalitygapof theeducationalserviceswas-1.62,-1.70,-1.52,-1.31,and-1.15forassurance,accountability,empathy,reliability,andtangibility,respectively,whichwasstatisticallysignificant(P< 0.001). The meaneducationalservicequalitygapwas-1.38basedonthestudents’ perceptions(P< 0.001). Therewasnosignificantrelationship between the students’ perceptions and expectations and their gender (P > 0.05). Conclusions: There are significant gaps in the educational service quality regarding accountability and assurance. More attention from policymakers seems to improve the educational service quality.","PeriodicalId":32200,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.80246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Noonecandenytheimportanceof educationalservicesandtheroleitplaysinattainingsocialgoals. Propertraining and students’ satisfaction leads to system promotion and finally social development. This study aimed to evaluate the educational service quality in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS). Methods: Thiscross-sectionalstudywasconductedin2014among327studentsofQUMSwhowereselectedthroughsimplerandom sampling. The most significant variables were tangibility, assurance, empathy, reliability, and accountability of the educational service quality. The data were collected using the 27 - item SERVQUAL questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha score ( α = 0.88) and test retest (R = 0.83) method were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: Theaverageageof thestudentswas22.2 ± 3.1years. Thequalitygapof theeducationalserviceswas-1.62,-1.70,-1.52,-1.31,and-1.15forassurance,accountability,empathy,reliability,andtangibility,respectively,whichwasstatisticallysignificant(P< 0.001). The meaneducationalservicequalitygapwas-1.38basedonthestudents’ perceptions(P< 0.001). Therewasnosignificantrelationship between the students’ perceptions and expectations and their gender (P > 0.05). Conclusions: There are significant gaps in the educational service quality regarding accountability and assurance. More attention from policymakers seems to improve the educational service quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育服务质量差距评估:学生视角
背景:无需强调教育服务的重要性,也无需强调社会算法的重要性。属性培训和学生满意度有助于系统的提升和最终的社会发展。本研究旨在评估加兹温医科大学(QUMS)的教育服务质量。方法:采用简单随机抽样的方法,于2014年对327名QUMS学生进行横断面调查。最重要的变量是教育服务质量的有形性、保证性、同理心、可靠性和问责制。数据是使用SERVQUAL的27项问卷收集的。使用Cronbachα评分(α=0.88)和测试-再测试(R=0.83)方法来确定问卷的可靠性。结果:学生的平均年龄为22.2±3.1岁。教育服务质量得分分别为1.62、-1.70、-1.52、-1.31和-1.15,基于学生的认知,平均教育服务质量得分为-1.38(P<0.001)。学生的认知和期望与性别之间没有明显的关系(P>0.05)。政策制定者的更多关注似乎提高了教育服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Roles of Family Functioning and Cognitive Failure in Predicting High-risk Behaviors Among Students with a History of Learning Disability The State of Moral Intelligence of Medical Students of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences in 2022 Creativity Accreditation Has Potential to Motivate Students with Low Grades to Improve Their Results: A Letter to Editor Identifying and Ranking Critical Success Factors for Cloud Computing Deployment at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical Education: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1