Father Figures: Renegotiating Preservation of Oral Tradition Through Four Forefathers

Gina Devincenzi
{"title":"Father Figures: Renegotiating Preservation of Oral Tradition Through Four Forefathers","authors":"Gina Devincenzi","doi":"10.1080/0361526x.2023.2173356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Oral tradition is a temporally contingent information medium predicated upon the present, which requires preservation efforts be predicated upon such as well. Despite being the oldest information sharing method in human history, its preservation remains dangerously overlooked, deprioritized, and misunderstood among information professionals. Since the advent of written language, oral tradition’s authority has been subjugated and eclipsed in favor of the stability availed by newer documentation methods, and as languages and cultures continue to go extinct, it is increasingly urgent to renegotiate the field’s approach to the medium and its preservation. By applying an interdisciplinary, narrative lens to the history of information, the means of ameliorating information science’s problematic relationship with oral tradition can be found in the same documents and ideologies that caused it, as written by four forefathers of modern thought. Through this, oral tradition’s significance is crystallized as the Father of Information – an essential pillar of the information field that if handled with care, holds great potential for communities, history, and information as it is known.","PeriodicalId":39557,"journal":{"name":"Serials Librarian","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Librarian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526x.2023.2173356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Oral tradition is a temporally contingent information medium predicated upon the present, which requires preservation efforts be predicated upon such as well. Despite being the oldest information sharing method in human history, its preservation remains dangerously overlooked, deprioritized, and misunderstood among information professionals. Since the advent of written language, oral tradition’s authority has been subjugated and eclipsed in favor of the stability availed by newer documentation methods, and as languages and cultures continue to go extinct, it is increasingly urgent to renegotiate the field’s approach to the medium and its preservation. By applying an interdisciplinary, narrative lens to the history of information, the means of ameliorating information science’s problematic relationship with oral tradition can be found in the same documents and ideologies that caused it, as written by four forefathers of modern thought. Through this, oral tradition’s significance is crystallized as the Father of Information – an essential pillar of the information field that if handled with care, holds great potential for communities, history, and information as it is known.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父亲形象:通过四位先父对口头传统保护的再谈判
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Serials Librarian
Serials Librarian Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Serials Librarian is an international journal covering all aspects of the management of serials and other continuing resources in any format—print, electronic, etc.—ranging from their publication, to their abstracting and indexing by commercial services, and their collection and processing by libraries. The journal provides a forum for discussion and innovation for all those involved in the serials information chain, but especially for librarians and other library staff, be they in a single (continuing resources) department or in collection development, acquisitions, cataloging/metadata, or information technology departments.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights: An Interview with Wend Wendland Guardians of Freedom: Examining Privacy, Censorship, and Government Legislation in Collection Development “Harmful to Minors” : How Book Bans Hurt Adolescent Development Changing Tides: A Critical Reflection on Neutrality and Antiracism in LIS Discouraging Freedom in the Library
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1