Using cooperative learning strategy to increase undergraduate students’ engagement and performance

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Action Research Pub Date : 2023-07-02 DOI:10.1080/09650792.2023.2231512
Andargachew Moges Agonafir
{"title":"Using cooperative learning strategy to increase undergraduate students’ engagement and performance","authors":"Andargachew Moges Agonafir","doi":"10.1080/09650792.2023.2231512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the 21st century, preparing university students for real work and lifelong learning requires instructors to serve as facilitators of learning rather than as providers of information. Instruction needs to be learner-centered, active, enjoyable, and engaging. As one form of active learning strategy, cooperative learning (e.g. group assignment) helps students to collaborate in tasks actively, and this in turn improves their learning and performance. However, in my undergraduate course, when I encourage students to do assignments in groups, many of them do not take it seriously and, as a result, the final product is in terms of quality and participation. The objective of this action research was to improve the educative value of group assignment as one form of cooperative learning by way of designing the task thoughtfully, following up and motivating students, providing constructive and timely feedback, and ensuring greater student engagement in the task. Third year psychology students were enrolled for the project, and two phase actions were implemented: preliminary and actual action implementation. The outcomes of the preliminary and actual action implementation were then compared. The findings revealed that, as a result of the intervention, students changed their attitudes towards group assignment and were more engaged in the second assignment than the first (t = 6.51, p = 0.05). Students’ performance in the second test and group project also increased (t = 2.80, p = 0.05 and t = 7.67, p = 0.05 respectively). Based on the findings, implications for future research and action are suggested.","PeriodicalId":47325,"journal":{"name":"Educational Action Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2231512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the 21st century, preparing university students for real work and lifelong learning requires instructors to serve as facilitators of learning rather than as providers of information. Instruction needs to be learner-centered, active, enjoyable, and engaging. As one form of active learning strategy, cooperative learning (e.g. group assignment) helps students to collaborate in tasks actively, and this in turn improves their learning and performance. However, in my undergraduate course, when I encourage students to do assignments in groups, many of them do not take it seriously and, as a result, the final product is in terms of quality and participation. The objective of this action research was to improve the educative value of group assignment as one form of cooperative learning by way of designing the task thoughtfully, following up and motivating students, providing constructive and timely feedback, and ensuring greater student engagement in the task. Third year psychology students were enrolled for the project, and two phase actions were implemented: preliminary and actual action implementation. The outcomes of the preliminary and actual action implementation were then compared. The findings revealed that, as a result of the intervention, students changed their attitudes towards group assignment and were more engaged in the second assignment than the first (t = 6.51, p = 0.05). Students’ performance in the second test and group project also increased (t = 2.80, p = 0.05 and t = 7.67, p = 0.05 respectively). Based on the findings, implications for future research and action are suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用合作学习策略提高本科生的参与度和表现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Action Research
Educational Action Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Educational Action Research is concerned with exploring the dialogue between research and practice in educational settings. The considerable increase in interest in action research in recent years has been accompanied by the development of a number of different approaches: for example, to promote reflective practice; professional development; empowerment; understanding of tacit professional knowledge; curriculum development; individual, institutional and community change; and development of democratic management and administration. Proponents of all these share the common aim of ending the dislocation of research from practice, an aim which links them with those involved in participatory research and action inquiry. This journal publishes accounts of a range of action research and related studies, in education and across the professions, with the aim of making their outcomes widely available and exemplifying the variety of possible styles of reporting. It aims to establish and maintain a review of the literature of action research. It also provides a forum for dialogue on the methodological and epistemological issues, enabling different approaches to be subjected to critical reflection and analysis. The impetus for Educational Action Research came from CARN, the Collaborative Action Research Network, and since its foundation in 1992, EAR has been important in extending and strengthening this international network.
期刊最新文献
How to become a “dynamo of transformation” in 10 easy lessons Impacting teaching and learning through collaborative reflective practice Leading program curriculum reform: reflections on challenges and successes Volunteer listeners as co-producers of knowledge: exploring the lived experience of older people’s social isolation through peer research Finding the sweet spot for insider action research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1