A call to collect and analyse recordings of personal independence payment assessments

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability & Society Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1080/09687599.2022.2060805
J. Webb, Saul Albert
{"title":"A call to collect and analyse recordings of personal independence payment assessments","authors":"J. Webb, Saul Albert","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2022.2060805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent UK policy changes enable claimants to record their Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments, presenting an opportunity to study how they are produced interactionally. Disabled people have often reported feeling disempowered by PIP assessments, and these assessments are notoriously inaccurate – the vast majority are overturned in the claimants’ favour upon appeal. Given the quality of claimants’ lives often depends on their outcome, it is urgent to learn how the assessment process yields so many successful appeals. Here we analyse a small sample of one PIP assessment recording, uploaded to YouTube by the claimant, to show the importance of understanding these high-stakes interactional situations. We intend for this to show the importance of looking at the interactional detail of PIP assessments, which have hitherto been hidden from scrutiny because of the difficulty of obtaining recordings of assessments.","PeriodicalId":48208,"journal":{"name":"Disability & Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"881 - 887"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2060805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Recent UK policy changes enable claimants to record their Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments, presenting an opportunity to study how they are produced interactionally. Disabled people have often reported feeling disempowered by PIP assessments, and these assessments are notoriously inaccurate – the vast majority are overturned in the claimants’ favour upon appeal. Given the quality of claimants’ lives often depends on their outcome, it is urgent to learn how the assessment process yields so many successful appeals. Here we analyse a small sample of one PIP assessment recording, uploaded to YouTube by the claimant, to show the importance of understanding these high-stakes interactional situations. We intend for this to show the importance of looking at the interactional detail of PIP assessments, which have hitherto been hidden from scrutiny because of the difficulty of obtaining recordings of assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吁收集和分析个人独立付款评估记录
最近英国的政策变化使索赔人能够记录他们的个人独立付款(PIP)评估,提供了一个机会来研究他们是如何产生互动的。残疾人经常报告说,他们被PIP评估剥夺了权力,而这些评估是出了名的不准确——在上诉时,绝大多数评估都被推翻了,有利于索赔人。鉴于索赔人的生活质量往往取决于他们的结果,迫切需要了解评估过程如何产生如此多的成功上诉。在这里,我们分析了一个PIP评估记录的小样本,由索赔人上传到YouTube上,以显示理解这些高风险互动情况的重要性。我们打算这样做是为了表明研究和平执行方案评估的相互作用细节的重要性,由于难以获得评估记录,这些评估迄今未受到审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Announcement of doctoral theses ‘Sick with stress’: perspectives on airport travel from persons living with dementia and their travel companions Announcement of doctoral theses Activating disability care: the formation of collective disability care networks in China’s COVID-19 outbreak Manifestations of spatial exclusion and inclusion of people with disabilities in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1