A Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol Moistened with Acetic Acid and Normal Saline in Second-trimester Pregnancy Termination: A Randomized Clinical Trial

F. Akhlaghi, Elaham Rezaie Askarye, M. Najafi, Zohre Khoee
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol Moistened with Acetic Acid and Normal Saline in Second-trimester Pregnancy Termination: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"F. Akhlaghi, Elaham Rezaie Askarye, M. Najafi, Zohre Khoee","doi":"10.22038/RCM.2019.38383.1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Second-trimester pregnancy termination with live fetuses is an important issue in obstetric practice since it is more challenging than first- and third-trimester pregnancy termination. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of vaginal misoprostol moistened with normal saline and acetic acid in second-trimester pregnancy termination.Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 95 pregnant women with the gestational age of 14-26 weeks admitted for medical induced abortion. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The first group was administered with vaginal misoprostol moistened with acetic acid (n=47), and the second group received vaginal misoprostol moistened with normal saline (n=48). The abortion rate within the first 24 hours, induced abortion interval, length of hospital stay, and curettage and its complications were assessed in the study groups using statistical methods, and the P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.Results: Abortion within the first 24 hours occurred in 100% of the patients in the acetic acid group and 75% of the subjects in the normal saline group, and the difference was considered statistically significant (P<0.001). The mean time for fetal delivery was significantly lower in the acetic acid group (12.3±4.8) compared to the normal saline group (17.5±6.6) (P<0.001). In addition, the length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the acetic acid group compared to the normal saline group (P=0.008). The rate of abortion following the second dose of misoprostol was 46.8% in the acetic acid group and 20.8% in the normal saline group. However, no significant differences were observed in curettage and its complications between the groups.Conclusion: According to the results, high vaginal acidity was associated with the increased effectiveness of misoprostol in second-trimester pregnancy termination.","PeriodicalId":21081,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/RCM.2019.38383.1260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Second-trimester pregnancy termination with live fetuses is an important issue in obstetric practice since it is more challenging than first- and third-trimester pregnancy termination. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of vaginal misoprostol moistened with normal saline and acetic acid in second-trimester pregnancy termination.Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 95 pregnant women with the gestational age of 14-26 weeks admitted for medical induced abortion. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The first group was administered with vaginal misoprostol moistened with acetic acid (n=47), and the second group received vaginal misoprostol moistened with normal saline (n=48). The abortion rate within the first 24 hours, induced abortion interval, length of hospital stay, and curettage and its complications were assessed in the study groups using statistical methods, and the P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.Results: Abortion within the first 24 hours occurred in 100% of the patients in the acetic acid group and 75% of the subjects in the normal saline group, and the difference was considered statistically significant (P<0.001). The mean time for fetal delivery was significantly lower in the acetic acid group (12.3±4.8) compared to the normal saline group (17.5±6.6) (P<0.001). In addition, the length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the acetic acid group compared to the normal saline group (P=0.008). The rate of abortion following the second dose of misoprostol was 46.8% in the acetic acid group and 20.8% in the normal saline group. However, no significant differences were observed in curettage and its complications between the groups.Conclusion: According to the results, high vaginal acidity was associated with the increased effectiveness of misoprostol in second-trimester pregnancy termination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
醋酸和生理盐水阴道湿润米索前列醇终止妊娠中期妊娠的比较研究:一项随机临床试验
引言:妊娠中期终止与活胎是一个重要的问题,在产科实践中,因为它比第一和第三妊娠终止更具挑战性。本研究旨在比较阴道米索前列醇与生理盐水和醋酸湿润在中期妊娠终止中的效果。方法:对95例胎龄14 ~ 26周的孕妇进行药物人工流产临床试验。受试者被随机分为两组。第一组患者口服醋酸湿润阴道米索前列醇(n=47),第二组患者口服生理盐水湿润阴道米索前列醇(n=48)。采用统计学方法对各研究组前24 h内流产率、人工流产间隔时间、住院时间、刮宫及其并发症进行评估,p值均小于0.05被认为是显著的。结果:醋酸组24小时内流产率为100%,生理盐水组为75%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。乙酸组平均分娩时间(12.3±4.8)明显低于生理盐水组(17.5±6.6)(P<0.001)。此外,乙酸组的住院时间明显低于生理盐水组(P=0.008)。米索前列醇第二次给药后流产率乙酸组为46.8%,生理盐水组为20.8%。然而,两组间刮除及其并发症无显著差异。结论:高阴道酸度与米索前列醇在中期妊娠终止中的有效性增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Overview of COVID-19 Stigma: India’s perspective “Pain of rejection is more severe than infection” Functional outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated by Locking Compression Plates- A Prospective Study. Evaluation of Interleukin 33 and ST2 serum concentration in active tuberculosis patients Trend and use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Gastroenterology patients. Estrogen on Candida spp. of the vagina: Is there any effect?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1