Should Private Companies Have the Same SEC Disclosure Requirements as Public Companies? A Debate

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Corporate Finance Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.1111/jacf.12519
Ludovic Phalippou, Gregory Brown
{"title":"Should Private Companies Have the Same SEC Disclosure Requirements as Public Companies? A Debate","authors":"Ludovic Phalippou,&nbsp;Gregory Brown","doi":"10.1111/jacf.12519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As with any important policy decision, the question of mandated disclosure for private equity must weigh the potential benefits against the costs of implementation. At the 2022 Private Equity Research Symposium hosted by Oxford University, Oxford's Ludovic Phalippou and UNC-Chapel Hill's Gregory Brown debated the merits of greater mandated financial reporting for private companies. Phalippou's arguments in favor of more disclosure center on the potential lack of alignment between private equity fund general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs), which can distort the incentives of GPs to be transparent and honest with LPs. Brown's arguments against increasing mandated disclosure focus on the potentially large costs associated with substantially more reporting, especially for smaller companies. These costs could change the landscape of private investments in a way that reduces investment in innovative, high-growth companies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Corporate Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jacf.12519","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Corporate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jacf.12519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As with any important policy decision, the question of mandated disclosure for private equity must weigh the potential benefits against the costs of implementation. At the 2022 Private Equity Research Symposium hosted by Oxford University, Oxford's Ludovic Phalippou and UNC-Chapel Hill's Gregory Brown debated the merits of greater mandated financial reporting for private companies. Phalippou's arguments in favor of more disclosure center on the potential lack of alignment between private equity fund general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs), which can distort the incentives of GPs to be transparent and honest with LPs. Brown's arguments against increasing mandated disclosure focus on the potentially large costs associated with substantially more reporting, especially for smaller companies. These costs could change the landscape of private investments in a way that reduces investment in innovative, high-growth companies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私人公司是否应该和上市公司有同样的信息披露要求?一场辩论
与任何重要的政策决定一样,私人股本强制披露的问题必须权衡潜在收益与执行成本。在牛津大学(Oxford University)主办的2022年私募股权研究研讨会(Private Equity Research Symposium)上,牛津大学的卢多维奇•法利普(Ludovic Phalippou)和北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校(UNC-Chapel Hill)的格雷戈里•布朗(Gregory Brown)就加强对私营公司财务报告的强制性要求的好处展开了辩论。法利普支持更多信息披露的理由是,私募股权基金的普通合伙人(gp)和有限合伙人(lp)之间可能缺乏一致性,这可能会扭曲普通合伙人对有限合伙人透明和诚实的动机。布朗反对增加强制披露的理由集中在大量增加报告可能带来的巨大成本上,尤其是对小公司而言。这些成本可能会在某种程度上改变私人投资的格局,减少对创新、高增长公司的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Michael C. Jensen: Scholar, mentor, colleague Michael Jensen's contributions to the theory of the firm: A tribute in three acts A message from the editor Issue Information - TOC A message from the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1