Impact of lecturers’ emotional intelligence on students’ learning and engagement in remote learning spaces: A cross-cultural study

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI:10.14742/ajet.7848
A. Gunasekara, K. Turner, Chorng Yuan Fung, C. Stough
{"title":"Impact of lecturers’ emotional intelligence on students’ learning and engagement in remote learning spaces: A cross-cultural study","authors":"A. Gunasekara, K. Turner, Chorng Yuan Fung, C. Stough","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education institutions have recently transitioned from face-to-face to online teaching and learning environments. However, academic staff lack sufficient training in applying emotional intelligence (EI) skills and strategies in online learning environments. Although literature addressing academics’ EI is sparse, some studies have suggested that lecturers’ EI greatly influences teaching and learning. This study used the concept of EI to understand students’ perceptions of how lecturers’ EI impacted their learning and engagement in an online learning environment. We conducted four online focus group interviews of 14 students pursuing a bachelor’s degree at two campuses of an Australian university, one in Melbourne and the other in Malaysia. Four main themes were identified using thematic analysis. Students discussed their perceptions and experiences on (a) vulnerabilities, coping and empathy; (b) relationships with lecturers, trust and safety; (c) communication, tone and voice; and (d) managing emotions of lecturers. Our findings suggest that lecturers’ EI impacted students’ learning and engagement in online learning spaces. However, the impact differs between Australia and Malaysia due to cultural differences. Drawing on the findings, we present online education good practices grounded in the theory of EI. Lecturers delivering online courses should consider employing these practices for effective teaching.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nHigher educational institutions need to support lecturers in developing the necessary EI skills to engage students in online learning.\nLecturers need to make meaningful attempts to develop positive relationships with students in online forums to support students’ engagement.\nLecturers working in online learning environments need to support students to develop friendships and connections with their peers.\nLecturers need to include regular discussion breaks during online lectures to allow students to share their opinions and experiences.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Higher education institutions have recently transitioned from face-to-face to online teaching and learning environments. However, academic staff lack sufficient training in applying emotional intelligence (EI) skills and strategies in online learning environments. Although literature addressing academics’ EI is sparse, some studies have suggested that lecturers’ EI greatly influences teaching and learning. This study used the concept of EI to understand students’ perceptions of how lecturers’ EI impacted their learning and engagement in an online learning environment. We conducted four online focus group interviews of 14 students pursuing a bachelor’s degree at two campuses of an Australian university, one in Melbourne and the other in Malaysia. Four main themes were identified using thematic analysis. Students discussed their perceptions and experiences on (a) vulnerabilities, coping and empathy; (b) relationships with lecturers, trust and safety; (c) communication, tone and voice; and (d) managing emotions of lecturers. Our findings suggest that lecturers’ EI impacted students’ learning and engagement in online learning spaces. However, the impact differs between Australia and Malaysia due to cultural differences. Drawing on the findings, we present online education good practices grounded in the theory of EI. Lecturers delivering online courses should consider employing these practices for effective teaching. Implications for practice or policy: Higher educational institutions need to support lecturers in developing the necessary EI skills to engage students in online learning. Lecturers need to make meaningful attempts to develop positive relationships with students in online forums to support students’ engagement. Lecturers working in online learning environments need to support students to develop friendships and connections with their peers. Lecturers need to include regular discussion breaks during online lectures to allow students to share their opinions and experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程学习空间中讲师情商对学生学习和投入的影响:一项跨文化研究
高等教育机构最近已从面对面教学环境过渡到在线教学环境。然而,学术人员在在线学习环境中应用情商(EI)技能和策略方面缺乏足够的培训。尽管关于学者EI的文献很少,但一些研究表明,讲师的EI对教学有很大影响。本研究使用EI的概念来了解学生对讲师的EI如何影响他们在在线学习环境中的学习和参与的看法。我们对在澳大利亚一所大学的两个校区(一个在墨尔本,另一个在马来西亚)攻读学士学位的14名学生进行了四次在线焦点小组访谈。通过专题分析确定了四个主要专题。学生们讨论了他们对(a)脆弱性、应对和同理心的看法和经历;(b) 与讲师的关系、信任和安全;(c) 沟通、语气和声音;以及(d)管理讲师的情绪。我们的研究结果表明,讲师的EI影响了学生在在线学习空间的学习和参与。然而,由于文化差异,澳大利亚和马来西亚的影响有所不同。根据研究结果,我们提出了基于EI理论的在线教育良好实践。提供在线课程的讲师应考虑采用这些做法进行有效教学。对实践或政策的影响:高等教育机构需要支持讲师发展必要的EI技能,让学生参与在线学习。讲师需要做出有意义的尝试,在在线论坛上与学生建立积极的关系,以支持学生的参与。在在线学习环境中工作的讲师需要支持学生与同龄人建立友谊和联系。讲师需要在在线讲座期间定期进行讨论,让学生分享他们的观点和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to sustain a centralised approach to learning design Privacy versus pedagogy – students’ perceptions of using learning analytics in higher education Access and Participation: The use of Technologies as tools for Inclusion by Spanish University Lecturers The effects of visualisation literacy and data storytelling dashboards on teachers’ cognitive load Students got mail: Do students read semi-tailored emails and what is the impact?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1