Dermoscopic Assessment of Pityriasis Versicolor: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Navakumar Manickam, Praveen Vasanthi Saminathan, Deepika Vazhavanthan, Kannan Gopalan
{"title":"Dermoscopic Assessment of Pityriasis Versicolor: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study","authors":"Navakumar Manickam, Praveen Vasanthi Saminathan, Deepika Vazhavanthan, Kannan Gopalan","doi":"10.1097/JD9.0000000000000313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Pityriasis versicolor (PV) is usually a clinical diagnosis. In uncertain cases, PV is confirmed by microscopic examination with 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH). However, the KOH test is not 100% sensitive in diagnosing PV. Dermoscopy of PV is still an unexplored area with very little data reported. This study was planned to study the various dermoscopic features and their utility in the diagnosis of PV. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was carried out over a 1-year period (September 2020–September 2021) among 57 patients with KOH-confirmed PV. All patients underwent dermoscopy using a handheld dermoscope (DermLite DL4; DermLite LLC). The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data. Results: Of the 57 patients, 43 (75.44%) had the hypopigmented type, followed by the hyperpigmented type (n = 12, 21.05%) and the perifollicular type (n = 2, 3.51%). Nonuniform pigmentation was the most common dermoscopic finding observed in both patients with hypopigmented PV (n = 42, 97.67%) and hyperpigmented PV (n = 12, 100%) (P = 0.001). Scaling was the second most commonly observed finding; patchy scaling (n = 25, 58.13%) and perifollicular scaling (n = 13, 30.23%) were commonly seen in hypopigmented PV, while hyperpigmented PV showed more diffuse scaling (n = 6, 50.00%) (P = 0.04) followed by patchy scaling (n = 5, 41.66%). Dermoscopy showed unique “double-edged scales” in all lesions with furrow scaling (n = 11, 19.30%) after eliciting a positive evoked scale sign. Other interesting features seen in hypopigmented PV were hypopigmentation around the hair follicle (n = 24, 55.48%) (P = 0.001) and perilesional hyperpigmentation (the halo sign) (n = 15, 34.88%) (P = 0.04). Conclusion: We observed several dermoscopic findings in PV that can serve as useful clues for differentiating PV from other similar disorders.","PeriodicalId":34265,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology and Venerology","volume":"6 1","pages":"130 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology and Venerology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JD9.0000000000000313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pityriasis versicolor (PV) is usually a clinical diagnosis. In uncertain cases, PV is confirmed by microscopic examination with 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH). However, the KOH test is not 100% sensitive in diagnosing PV. Dermoscopy of PV is still an unexplored area with very little data reported. This study was planned to study the various dermoscopic features and their utility in the diagnosis of PV. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was carried out over a 1-year period (September 2020–September 2021) among 57 patients with KOH-confirmed PV. All patients underwent dermoscopy using a handheld dermoscope (DermLite DL4; DermLite LLC). The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data. Results: Of the 57 patients, 43 (75.44%) had the hypopigmented type, followed by the hyperpigmented type (n = 12, 21.05%) and the perifollicular type (n = 2, 3.51%). Nonuniform pigmentation was the most common dermoscopic finding observed in both patients with hypopigmented PV (n = 42, 97.67%) and hyperpigmented PV (n = 12, 100%) (P = 0.001). Scaling was the second most commonly observed finding; patchy scaling (n = 25, 58.13%) and perifollicular scaling (n = 13, 30.23%) were commonly seen in hypopigmented PV, while hyperpigmented PV showed more diffuse scaling (n = 6, 50.00%) (P = 0.04) followed by patchy scaling (n = 5, 41.66%). Dermoscopy showed unique “double-edged scales” in all lesions with furrow scaling (n = 11, 19.30%) after eliciting a positive evoked scale sign. Other interesting features seen in hypopigmented PV were hypopigmentation around the hair follicle (n = 24, 55.48%) (P = 0.001) and perilesional hyperpigmentation (the halo sign) (n = 15, 34.88%) (P = 0.04). Conclusion: We observed several dermoscopic findings in PV that can serve as useful clues for differentiating PV from other similar disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤镜下评估糠疹与西洛的关系:一项横断面观察研究
目的:花斑癣(PV)是一种常见的临床诊断方法。在不确定的情况下,PV通过使用10%氢氧化钾(KOH)进行显微镜检查来确认。然而,KOH试验在诊断PV方面并非100%敏感。PV的皮肤镜检查仍然是一个未探索的领域,很少有数据报道。本研究旨在研究各种皮肤镜特征及其在PV诊断中的应用。方法:这项横断面观察性研究对57名KOH确诊的PV患者进行了为期1年的研究(2020年9月至2021年9月)。所有患者均使用手持式皮肤镜(DermLite DL4;DermLite LLC)进行皮肤镜检查。卡方检验或Fisher精确检验用于分析数据。结果:57例患者中色素沉着型43例(75.44%),其次是色素沉着型(n=12,21.05%)和毛囊周型(n=2,3.51%)。色素沉着不均匀是在色素沉着型PV(n=42,97.67%)和色素沉着型PV12,100%(P=0.001)患者中观察到的最常见的皮肤镜检查结果;斑片状鳞屑(n=25.58.13%)和毛囊周围鳞屑(n=13.023%)在色素沉着的PV中常见,而色素沉着的光伏表现出更多的弥漫性鳞屑(n=650.00%)(P=0.04),其次是斑片状鳞垢(n=541.66%)。在所有引起阳性诱发的鳞屑征后出现犁沟鳞屑的病变中,皮肤镜显示出独特的“双刃鳞”(n=119.30%)。色素沉着不足的PV的其他有趣特征是毛囊周围色素沉着不足(n=24,55.48%)(P=0.001)和病变周围色素沉着过度(晕征)(n=15,34.88%)(P=0.04)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2950
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of methionine synthase rs1805087 polymorphism with arsenic-related skin pigmentary changes: a population-based case–control study Areal roughness of the dorsal nail plate Expert consensus on the clinical application of aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris (2022)# Identification of key pathways and genes involved in psoriasis and vitiligo using bioinformatics analysis Systematic review and meta-analysis Literature-based Clinical Retrospective Analysis of Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1