The influence of macroinvertebrate abundance on the assessment of freshwater quality in The Netherlands

K. Beentjes, A. Speksnijder, M. Schilthuizen, B. Schaub, B. V. D. Hoorn
{"title":"The influence of macroinvertebrate abundance on the assessment of freshwater quality in The Netherlands","authors":"K. Beentjes, A. Speksnijder, M. Schilthuizen, B. Schaub, B. V. D. Hoorn","doi":"10.3897/MBMG.2.26744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of molecular tools for the detection and identification of invertebrate species enables the development of more easily standardisable inventories of biological elements for water quality assessments, as it circumvents human-based bias and errors in species identifications. Current Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) assessments methods, however, often rely on abundance data. Translating metabarcoding sequence data into biomass or specimen abundances has proven difficult, as PCR amplification bias due to primer mismatching often provides skewed proportions of read abundances. While some potential solutions have been proposed in previous research, we instead looked at the necessity of abundance data in EQR assessments. In this study, we used historical monitoring data from natural (lakes, rivers and streams) and artificial (ditches and canals) water bodies to assess the impact of species abundances on the EQR scores for macroinvertebrates in the Water Framework Directive (WFD) monitoring programme of The Netherlands. By removing all the abundance data from the taxon observations, we simulated presence/absence-based monitoring, for which EQRs were calculated according to traditional methods. Our results showed a strong correlation between abundance-based and presence/absence-based EQRs. EQR scores were generally higher without abundances (75.8% of all samples), which resulted in 9.1% of samples being assigned to a higher quality class. The majority of the samples (89.7%) were assigned to the same quality class in both cases. These results are valuable for the incorporation of presence/absence metabarcoding data into water quality assessment methodology, potentially eliminating the need to translate metabarcoding data into biomass or absolute specimen counts for EQR assessments.","PeriodicalId":18374,"journal":{"name":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/MBMG.2.26744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The use of molecular tools for the detection and identification of invertebrate species enables the development of more easily standardisable inventories of biological elements for water quality assessments, as it circumvents human-based bias and errors in species identifications. Current Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) assessments methods, however, often rely on abundance data. Translating metabarcoding sequence data into biomass or specimen abundances has proven difficult, as PCR amplification bias due to primer mismatching often provides skewed proportions of read abundances. While some potential solutions have been proposed in previous research, we instead looked at the necessity of abundance data in EQR assessments. In this study, we used historical monitoring data from natural (lakes, rivers and streams) and artificial (ditches and canals) water bodies to assess the impact of species abundances on the EQR scores for macroinvertebrates in the Water Framework Directive (WFD) monitoring programme of The Netherlands. By removing all the abundance data from the taxon observations, we simulated presence/absence-based monitoring, for which EQRs were calculated according to traditional methods. Our results showed a strong correlation between abundance-based and presence/absence-based EQRs. EQR scores were generally higher without abundances (75.8% of all samples), which resulted in 9.1% of samples being assigned to a higher quality class. The majority of the samples (89.7%) were assigned to the same quality class in both cases. These results are valuable for the incorporation of presence/absence metabarcoding data into water quality assessment methodology, potentially eliminating the need to translate metabarcoding data into biomass or absolute specimen counts for EQR assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰大型无脊椎动物丰度对淡水水质评价的影响
使用分子工具来检测和鉴定无脊椎动物物种,可以更容易地为水质评估制定标准化的生物元素清单,因为它避免了物种鉴定中基于人类的偏见和错误。然而,目前的生态质量比(EQR)评价方法往往依赖于丰度数据。将元条形码序列数据转换为生物量或标本丰度已被证明是困难的,因为引物不匹配导致的PCR扩增偏差通常会导致读过丰度的倾斜比例。虽然在之前的研究中已经提出了一些潜在的解决方案,但我们更关注的是在EQR评估中大量数据的必要性。在这项研究中,我们使用了来自自然(湖泊、河流和溪流)和人工(沟渠和运河)水体的历史监测数据,以评估物种丰度对荷兰水框架指令(WFD)监测计划中大型无脊椎动物EQR分数的影响。通过从分类群观测中剔除所有丰度数据,模拟基于存在/缺失的监测,并根据传统方法计算eqr。我们的研究结果显示,基于丰度的EQRs和基于存在/缺失的EQRs之间存在很强的相关性。在没有丰度的情况下,EQR分数通常更高(占所有样本的75.8%),这导致9.1%的样本被分配到更高质量的类别。在两种情况下,大多数样本(89.7%)被分配到相同的质量类别。这些结果对于将存在/缺失元条形码数据纳入水质评估方法很有价值,有可能消除将元条形码数据转换为生物量或绝对标本计数以进行EQR评估的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Simple approaches for evaluation of OTU quality based on dissimilarity arrays Assessing the diversity of nematodes in the Store Mosse National Park (Sweden) using metabarcoding Halamphora taxa in Hungarian soda pans and shallow soda lakes detected via metabarcoding and microscopic analyses Insights into the ecological impact of trout introduction in an oligotrophic lake using sedimentary environmental DNA Exploring benthic diatom diversity in the West Antarctic Peninsula: insights from a morphological and molecular approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1