{"title":"A symbolic legislative gesture? An argument for active enforcement of the insider trading prohibition in Myanmar","authors":"M. Gillis","doi":"10.1080/17521440.2020.1722548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of this short article is to examine one aspect of Myanmar’s recent market reform, namely, its prohibition of insider trading. The prohibition is itself uncontroversial and brings Myanmar into line with the securities laws of most other developed nations. The focus of this article is, rather, on whether the prohibition should be actively enforced or left to function as a mere symbolic legislative gesture. It is argued here that active enforcement is desirable in the developing economy context, but that the current legislative formulation of the insider trading prohibition in Myanmar leaves the prohibition to function really only as a symbolic gesture. The article undertakes a short comparative analysis with the Australian prohibition of insider trading and concludes both that prosecution under the current prohibition would be difficult and that legislative amendment is required.","PeriodicalId":43241,"journal":{"name":"Law and Financial Markets Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"59 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2020.1722548","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Financial Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2020.1722548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The object of this short article is to examine one aspect of Myanmar’s recent market reform, namely, its prohibition of insider trading. The prohibition is itself uncontroversial and brings Myanmar into line with the securities laws of most other developed nations. The focus of this article is, rather, on whether the prohibition should be actively enforced or left to function as a mere symbolic legislative gesture. It is argued here that active enforcement is desirable in the developing economy context, but that the current legislative formulation of the insider trading prohibition in Myanmar leaves the prohibition to function really only as a symbolic gesture. The article undertakes a short comparative analysis with the Australian prohibition of insider trading and concludes both that prosecution under the current prohibition would be difficult and that legislative amendment is required.
期刊介绍:
The Law and Financial Markets Review is a new, independent, English language journal devoted to providing high quality information, comment and analysis for lawyers specialising in banking and financial market issues and to others with interests in legal and regulatory developments affecting the financial markets. Published four times a year LFMR contains articles written by leading experts providing a forum for practical guidance on, as well as reflective and topical analysis of, all major jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the interaction between the law and market practice and behaviour.