Development of a Risk Predictive Scoring System for Epilepsy in Infants with Paroxysmal Motor Events: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Q4 Medicine Annals of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2021-12-24 DOI:10.26815/acn.2021.00514
H. Kim, H. Jang, Hyunji Ahn, M. Yum, T. Ko
{"title":"Development of a Risk Predictive Scoring System for Epilepsy in Infants with Paroxysmal Motor Events: A Retrospective Single-Center Study","authors":"H. Kim, H. Jang, Hyunji Ahn, M. Yum, T. Ko","doi":"10.26815/acn.2021.00514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Paroxysmal motor events are common clinical symptoms in infants visiting pediatric neurology clinics. Due to the heterogeneous clinical symptoms and the difficulty of interpreting electroencephalography (EEG) in infants, differentiating paroxysmal motor events from epileptic events is challenging. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for the diagnosis of epilepsy in infants and to develop a scoring system that predicts the risk of epilepsy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who presented with paroxysmal motor events in infancy between January 2008 and December 2009 at Asan Medical Center. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patients’ demographics, medical history, clinical characteristics associated with specific situations, and motor symptoms. Laboratory findings, EEG, and brain magnetic resonance imaging were also reviewed. Results: In total, 111 infants with paroxysmal motor events were enrolled. Non-epileptic paroxysmal motor events (NEPMs) were associated with specific situations ( P <0.001). Patients with epilepsy were likely to have focal motor symptoms ( P =0.08), a medical history of a neurologic disorder, and/or a family history of epilepsy ( P <0.05). A risk scoring system was developed based on these risk factors; using this system, infants with 2 or more points could be diagnosed with epilepsy with 61.76% sensitivity and 88.31% specificity. Conclusion: Infants with paroxysmal motor events were more likely to be diagnosed with NEPMs than with epilepsy. An absence of specific situations for paroxysmal events, focal motor seizures, and a medical history of another illness were associated with the final diagnosis of epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":33305,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26815/acn.2021.00514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Paroxysmal motor events are common clinical symptoms in infants visiting pediatric neurology clinics. Due to the heterogeneous clinical symptoms and the difficulty of interpreting electroencephalography (EEG) in infants, differentiating paroxysmal motor events from epileptic events is challenging. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for the diagnosis of epilepsy in infants and to develop a scoring system that predicts the risk of epilepsy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who presented with paroxysmal motor events in infancy between January 2008 and December 2009 at Asan Medical Center. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patients’ demographics, medical history, clinical characteristics associated with specific situations, and motor symptoms. Laboratory findings, EEG, and brain magnetic resonance imaging were also reviewed. Results: In total, 111 infants with paroxysmal motor events were enrolled. Non-epileptic paroxysmal motor events (NEPMs) were associated with specific situations ( P <0.001). Patients with epilepsy were likely to have focal motor symptoms ( P =0.08), a medical history of a neurologic disorder, and/or a family history of epilepsy ( P <0.05). A risk scoring system was developed based on these risk factors; using this system, infants with 2 or more points could be diagnosed with epilepsy with 61.76% sensitivity and 88.31% specificity. Conclusion: Infants with paroxysmal motor events were more likely to be diagnosed with NEPMs than with epilepsy. An absence of specific situations for paroxysmal events, focal motor seizures, and a medical history of another illness were associated with the final diagnosis of epilepsy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项具有阵发性运动事件的婴儿癫痫风险预测评分系统的开发:一项回顾性单中心研究
目的:发作性运动事件是儿科神经科就诊婴儿的常见临床症状。由于婴儿临床症状的异质性和脑电图(EEG)的解释困难,区分阵发性运动事件和癫痫事件具有挑战性。本研究旨在调查诊断婴儿癫痫的危险因素,并开发一个预测癫痫风险的评分系统。方法:我们回顾性分析了2008年1月至2009年12月在峨山医疗中心出现婴儿期发作性运动事件的患者的数据。对电子医疗记录进行了审查,以了解患者的人口统计学、病史、与特定情况相关的临床特征和运动症状。还回顾了实验室发现、脑电图和脑磁共振成像。结果:共有111例发作性运动事件婴儿入选。非癫痫发作性运动事件(NEPM)与特定情况相关(P<0.001)。癫痫患者可能有局灶性运动症状(P=0.08)、神经系统疾病病史和/或癫痫家族史(P<0.05)。基于这些风险因素制定了风险评分系统;使用该系统,2分及以上的婴儿可诊断为癫痫,敏感性为61.76%,特异性为88.31%。结论:发作性运动事件的婴儿更容易被诊断为NEPM,而不是癫痫。没有发作性事件的特定情况、局灶性运动性癫痫发作和其他疾病的病史与癫痫的最终诊断有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Child Neurology
Annals of Child Neurology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Headache: A Comprehensive Review A Novel Compound Heterozygous Mutation in the GALC gene in a Tunisian Family Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Behavioral and Emotional Factors in Pediatric Patients with Headache Clinical Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreaks in Korea on Seizures in Children Clinical Analysis and Red Flag Signs in Pediatric Headache According to Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1