The OECD Model Tax Convention and its commentaries as a source of interpretation of double taxation treaties in Ukraine

Glukh Maryna, Serdiuk Viktoriia, Selezen Pavlo, Babenko Anton
{"title":"The OECD Model Tax Convention and its commentaries as a source of interpretation of double taxation treaties in Ukraine","authors":"Glukh Maryna, Serdiuk Viktoriia, Selezen Pavlo, Babenko Anton","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2021/11/2.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpretation of double taxation treaties is of utmost importance for application of their norms according to the criteria of good faith in compliance with the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. At the same time, there is no consensus in understanding the role of the OECD MC and its Commentaries as means of interpretation of double taxation treaties. As it is demonstrated on the basis of the development of court practice in Ukraine, the present situation does not add certainty to implementation of double taxation treaties and might even have the negative effect on investment climate in a state of source of income. The article does also contain the ways of improvement of application of the OECD MC and its Commentaries during the implementation of double taxation treaties of Ukraine including (1)preparation of the letter on issue of application of the OECD MC and its Commentaries as a source of interpretation of double taxation treaties by the Supreme Court of Ukraine, (2) granting of the technical assistance to tax authorities of Ukrainein the area of application of double taxation treaties in accordance with the international standards such as the OECD MC and its Commentaries and (3) translation of the OECD MC and its Commentaries into Ukrainian language.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2021/11/2.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpretation of double taxation treaties is of utmost importance for application of their norms according to the criteria of good faith in compliance with the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. At the same time, there is no consensus in understanding the role of the OECD MC and its Commentaries as means of interpretation of double taxation treaties. As it is demonstrated on the basis of the development of court practice in Ukraine, the present situation does not add certainty to implementation of double taxation treaties and might even have the negative effect on investment climate in a state of source of income. The article does also contain the ways of improvement of application of the OECD MC and its Commentaries during the implementation of double taxation treaties of Ukraine including (1)preparation of the letter on issue of application of the OECD MC and its Commentaries as a source of interpretation of double taxation treaties by the Supreme Court of Ukraine, (2) granting of the technical assistance to tax authorities of Ukrainein the area of application of double taxation treaties in accordance with the international standards such as the OECD MC and its Commentaries and (3) translation of the OECD MC and its Commentaries into Ukrainian language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经合组织税收示范公约及其评注作为乌克兰双重征税条约的解释来源
对双重征税条约的解释对于按照《维也纳条约法公约》的规定,按照诚意标准适用其规范至关重要。与此同时,在理解经合组织《蒙特利尔议定书》及其评注作为解释双重征税条约手段的作用方面没有达成共识。正如乌克兰法院实践的发展所表明的那样,目前的情况并不能增加双重征税条约的执行确定性,甚至可能对收入来源国的投资环境产生负面影响。该条还载有在执行乌克兰双重征税条约期间改进经合组织《多边贸易协定》及其评注适用的方法,包括(1)编写关于经合组织《双边贸易协定》的适用问题的信函,作为乌克兰最高法院对双重征税条约的解释来源,(2)根据国际标准,如经合组织MC及其评注,在双重征税条约的适用领域向乌克兰税务机关提供技术援助;(3)将经合组织MC及评注翻译成乌克兰语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1