Provenance visualization: Tracing people, processes, and practices through a data-driven approach to provenance

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.1093/llc/fqad020
T. Vancisin, Loraine Clarke, M. Orr, Uta Hinrichs
{"title":"Provenance visualization: Tracing people, processes, and practices through a data-driven approach to provenance","authors":"T. Vancisin, Loraine Clarke, M. Orr, Uta Hinrichs","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqad020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Provenance disclosure—the documentation of an artifact’s origin and how it was produced—is an important aspect to consider when working with historical records which undergo multiple transformations in preparation for and during digitization. Provenance in this context is commonly communicated through explanatory text or static diagrams. However, the methodological and curatorial decisions that have influenced the records’ data are easily overlooked, in particular when exploring the records through visualization as a result of digitization processes. We propose a data-driven approach to provenance disclosure which (1) traces provenance back to when the records were created, (2) documents and categorizes the records’ transformations (transcriptions, content modifications, changes in organization, and representational form), and (3) uses data visualization to disclose provenance in interactive ways. We reflect on how this approach can be practically applied in the context of historical record collections, and we present findings from a qualitative study we conducted to investigate the merits and limitations of provenance-driven visualization. Our findings suggest that data-driven provenance disclosure has the potential to (1) promote transparency and deeper interpretations of historical records, (2) provide rigor in researching historical document collections and underlying production processes, and (3) encourage ethical considerations by making visible labor and implicit bias that influence the production and curation of historical records.","PeriodicalId":45315,"journal":{"name":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Provenance disclosure—the documentation of an artifact’s origin and how it was produced—is an important aspect to consider when working with historical records which undergo multiple transformations in preparation for and during digitization. Provenance in this context is commonly communicated through explanatory text or static diagrams. However, the methodological and curatorial decisions that have influenced the records’ data are easily overlooked, in particular when exploring the records through visualization as a result of digitization processes. We propose a data-driven approach to provenance disclosure which (1) traces provenance back to when the records were created, (2) documents and categorizes the records’ transformations (transcriptions, content modifications, changes in organization, and representational form), and (3) uses data visualization to disclose provenance in interactive ways. We reflect on how this approach can be practically applied in the context of historical record collections, and we present findings from a qualitative study we conducted to investigate the merits and limitations of provenance-driven visualization. Our findings suggest that data-driven provenance disclosure has the potential to (1) promote transparency and deeper interpretations of historical records, (2) provide rigor in researching historical document collections and underlying production processes, and (3) encourage ethical considerations by making visible labor and implicit bias that influence the production and curation of historical records.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来源可视化:通过数据驱动的来源方法跟踪人员、过程和实践
来源披露——记录文物的起源及其生产方式——是处理历史记录时需要考虑的一个重要方面,这些历史记录在数字化准备和数字化过程中经历了多次转换。在这种情况下,原产地通常通过解释性文本或静态图表进行交流。然而,影响记录数据的方法和策展决策很容易被忽视,尤其是在数字化过程中通过可视化探索记录时。我们提出了一种数据驱动的出处披露方法,该方法(1)将出处追溯到记录创建时,(2)记录并分类记录的转换(转录、内容修改、组织变化和表征形式),以及(3)使用数据可视化以交互方式披露出处。我们反思了这种方法如何在历史记录收集的背景下实际应用,并介绍了我们进行的一项定性研究的结果,该研究旨在调查来源驱动可视化的优点和局限性。我们的研究结果表明,数据驱动的出处披露有可能(1)促进历史记录的透明度和更深入的解释,(2)为研究历史文献收藏和潜在的生产过程提供严谨性,以及(3)通过制造影响历史记录的制作和管理的可见劳动和隐性偏见来鼓励伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: DSH or Digital Scholarship in the Humanities is an international, peer reviewed journal which publishes original contributions on all aspects of digital scholarship in the Humanities including, but not limited to, the field of what is currently called the Digital Humanities. Long and short papers report on theoretical, methodological, experimental, and applied research and include results of research projects, descriptions and evaluations of tools, techniques, and methodologies, and reports on work in progress. DSH also publishes reviews of books and resources. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities was previously known as Literary and Linguistic Computing.
期刊最新文献
Social network analysis of the Babylonian Talmud Unraveling Eileen Chang’s stylistic multiverse: insights from multivariate analysis with multifactorial design Ancient classical theatre from the digital humanities: a systematic review 2010–21 Language-based machine perception: linguistic perspectives on the compilation of captioning datasets Personality prediction via multi-task transformer architecture combined with image aesthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1