Practical Prosody: New Hope for Teaching German Plurals

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1111/tger.12192
Katharina S. Schuhmann, Laura Catharine Smith
{"title":"Practical Prosody: New Hope for Teaching German Plurals","authors":"Katharina S. Schuhmann,&nbsp;Laura Catharine Smith","doi":"10.1111/tger.12192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>German plural formation appears unsystematic and largely arbitrary to many second language (L2) learners. While some approaches have attempted to identify patterns and rules to help L2 learners (e.g., Anton et al., 2017; Di Donato &amp; Clyde, 2020; Kraiss, 2014), one central observation from linguistic analysis has been absent from pedagogical advances: German plurals show a strong tendency to end in a syllabic trochee (e.g., Wegener, 1999; Wiese, 2000, 2001, 2009). This article seeks to bridge the gap between linguistic insights and L2 pedagogy by presenting an instructional approach integrating the trochee. We provide support for this approach based on an exploratory study comparing two groups of L2 speakers that both received several suffix-predicting rules for specific word endings and completed controlled practice exercises on plurals. Crucially, only one group received additional instruction on the prosodic pattern of German plurals. While both groups made gains, the prosodic training group showed a greater increase in confidence and accuracy in plural formation, particularly among lower-proficiency speakers. The prosodic training group also produced more trochaic plurals for nonce words, thus responding more like native speakers. Overall, we suggest that this linguistically-informed strategy might help students learn plurals more effectively by delimiting suffix options based on prosody.</p>","PeriodicalId":43693,"journal":{"name":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

German plural formation appears unsystematic and largely arbitrary to many second language (L2) learners. While some approaches have attempted to identify patterns and rules to help L2 learners (e.g., Anton et al., 2017; Di Donato & Clyde, 2020; Kraiss, 2014), one central observation from linguistic analysis has been absent from pedagogical advances: German plurals show a strong tendency to end in a syllabic trochee (e.g., Wegener, 1999; Wiese, 2000, 2001, 2009). This article seeks to bridge the gap between linguistic insights and L2 pedagogy by presenting an instructional approach integrating the trochee. We provide support for this approach based on an exploratory study comparing two groups of L2 speakers that both received several suffix-predicting rules for specific word endings and completed controlled practice exercises on plurals. Crucially, only one group received additional instruction on the prosodic pattern of German plurals. While both groups made gains, the prosodic training group showed a greater increase in confidence and accuracy in plural formation, particularly among lower-proficiency speakers. The prosodic training group also produced more trochaic plurals for nonce words, thus responding more like native speakers. Overall, we suggest that this linguistically-informed strategy might help students learn plurals more effectively by delimiting suffix options based on prosody.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实用韵律:德语复数教学的新希望
对于许多第二语言学习者来说,德语的复数形式似乎没有系统,而且很大程度上是随意的。虽然一些方法试图识别模式和规则来帮助二语学习者(例如,Anton等人,2017;迪·多纳托;克莱德,2020;Kraiss, 2014),语言分析的一个中心观察结果在教学进步中缺失:德语复数表现出以音节扬格结尾的强烈趋势(例如,Wegener, 1999;Wiese, 2000,2001,2009)。本文试图通过提出一种整合扬格的教学方法来弥合语言学见解和二语教学法之间的差距。我们通过一项探索性研究为这种方法提供了支持,该研究比较了两组第二语言使用者,他们都接受了一些特定词尾的后缀预测规则,并完成了复数的控制练习。至关重要的是,只有一组接受了关于德语复数韵律模式的额外指导。虽然两组都取得了进步,但韵律训练组在复数形式的信心和准确性方面表现出了更大的提高,尤其是在熟练程度较低的人中间。韵律训练组也为非一次性单词产生了更多的扬格复数,因此反应更像母语人士。总的来说,我们建议这种基于语言的策略可以帮助学生更有效地学习基于韵律的后缀选项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Praxis articles and Forum on recruitment and retention Back in business! Professional German(s) at Rhodes College Uncertainty is in the Form: A functional, meaning-based approach to teaching ambiguity as author choice in Kafka's “Vor dem Gesetz” A collaboration between a high school and a college German program: Retention and articulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1