Adaptiveness for Online Learning: Conceptualising 'Online Learning Dexterity' from Higher Education Students' Experiences.

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s40841-023-00287-2
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh, Ben Kei Daniel, Angela C Greenman
{"title":"Adaptiveness for Online Learning: Conceptualising 'Online Learning Dexterity' from Higher Education Students' Experiences.","authors":"Joyce Hwee Ling Koh, Ben Kei Daniel, Angela C Greenman","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00287-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online learning dexterity, or the ability to effortlessly adapt to online learning situations, has become critical since the COVID-19 pandemic, but its processes are not well-understood. Using grounded theory, this study develops a paradigm model of online learning dexterity from semi-structured interviews with 32 undergraduate and postgraduate students from a university in New Zealand. Through students' online learning experiences during the pandemic from 2020 to 2021, online learning dexterity is found to be how students make online learning 'just as good' as face-to-face learning by creating and adjusting five learning manoeuvres according to developing online learning circumstances. Undergraduates and postgraduates re-use familiar study strategies as <i>deep learning manoeuvres,</i> but undergraduates restrict <i>support-seeking manoeuvres</i> to lecturers. Technical problems with online systems and poor course organisation by lecturers affected learning productivity, resulting in the need for more <i>time optimisation manoeuvres</i>. Social support helped students activate <i>persistence manoeuvres</i> to sustain online class attendance. However, undergraduates had more problems sustaining interest and engagement during class as they were not as proficient with using <i>learning presence manoeuvres</i> as postgraduates enrolled in distance learning programmes. The theoretical and practical significance of online learning dexterity for post-pandemic higher education is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-023-00287-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online learning dexterity, or the ability to effortlessly adapt to online learning situations, has become critical since the COVID-19 pandemic, but its processes are not well-understood. Using grounded theory, this study develops a paradigm model of online learning dexterity from semi-structured interviews with 32 undergraduate and postgraduate students from a university in New Zealand. Through students' online learning experiences during the pandemic from 2020 to 2021, online learning dexterity is found to be how students make online learning 'just as good' as face-to-face learning by creating and adjusting five learning manoeuvres according to developing online learning circumstances. Undergraduates and postgraduates re-use familiar study strategies as deep learning manoeuvres, but undergraduates restrict support-seeking manoeuvres to lecturers. Technical problems with online systems and poor course organisation by lecturers affected learning productivity, resulting in the need for more time optimisation manoeuvres. Social support helped students activate persistence manoeuvres to sustain online class attendance. However, undergraduates had more problems sustaining interest and engagement during class as they were not as proficient with using learning presence manoeuvres as postgraduates enrolled in distance learning programmes. The theoretical and practical significance of online learning dexterity for post-pandemic higher education is discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应在线学习:从高等教育学生的经历中理解“在线学习灵活性”
在线学习灵巧性,即毫不费力地适应在线学习环境的能力,自 COVID-19 大流行以来已变得至关重要,但人们对其过程并不十分了解。本研究采用基础理论,通过对新西兰一所大学 32 名本科生和研究生的半结构式访谈,建立了在线学习灵巧性的范式模型。通过学生在 2020 年至 2021 年大流行病期间的在线学习经历,研究发现在线学习灵巧性是指学生如何根据在线学习环境的发展,创造和调整五种学习方法,使在线学习 "与面对面学习一样好"。本科生和研究生会重复使用熟悉的学习策略作为深度学习技巧,但本科生会限制向讲师寻求支持的技巧。在线系统的技术问题和讲师对课程的组织不当影响了学习效率,导致学生需要更多的时间优化策略。社会支持帮助学生启动坚持策略,以维持在线课堂出勤率。然而,本科生在课堂上保持兴趣和参与度的问题更多,因为他们不像远程学习课程的研究生那样熟练使用学习存在策略。本文讨论了在线学习灵巧性对流行后高等教育的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: New Zealand Journal of Education Studies (NZJES) is the journal of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Since 1966, NZJES has published research of relevance to both the Aotearoa New Zealand and international education communities. NZJES publishes original research and scholarly writing that is insightful and thought provoking. NZJES seeks submissions of empirical (qualitative and quantitative) and non-empirical articles, including those that are methodologically or theoretically innovative, as well as scholarly essays and book reviews. The journal is multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary in approach, and committed to the principles and practice of biculturalism. In accordance with that commitment, NZJES welcomes submissions in either Maori or English, or the inclusion of the paper abstract in both English and Maori. NZJES also welcomes international submissions that shed light on matters of interest to its readership and that include reference to Aotearoa New Zealand authors and/or contexts. The journal also welcomes proposals for Special Themed Sections, which are groups of related papers curated by guest editors.NZJES is indexed in Scopus and ERIC. All articles have undergone rigorous double blind peer review by at least two expert reviewers, who are asked to adhere to the ‘Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers’ published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
On the Democratisation and Professionalisation of Higher Education Teaching Revisiting Teacher-Family Partnerships: A Critical Policy Analysis of Pacific Education Policy 2009–2030 The Idea of a “Flawed Treaty” and its Influence on Students’ Perceptions of the New Zealand Wars Teaching the Linguistically Diverse Learner in Aotearoa New Zealand. Edited by Rosemary Erlam (2024) Perspectives of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers on the Implications of Streaming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1