From Object-Level Meaning to Metatextual Meaning. The Case of Polish Particles

Q2 Arts and Humanities Studies in Polish Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.4467/23005920spl.23.003.18044
Krystyna Kleszczowa
{"title":"From Object-Level Meaning to Metatextual Meaning. The Case of Polish Particles","authors":"Krystyna Kleszczowa","doi":"10.4467/23005920spl.23.003.18044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on particles derived from object-level expressions, but operating at a higher, metatextual level. Such particles are sourced chiefly from speaker-oriented parentheticals composed of verba dicendi and verba sentiendi. Following the elision of parentheticals and other expressions, functional homonymy arises: a particle/a different part of speech (most commonly an adverb). This results in an uncertainty regarding the status of particles. The understanding of particles as parts of speech is also problematic due to the linguistic tradition which relies on the Latin name particula, meaning ‘a little part’/‘a particle’. The classification of expressions operating both at the object and the metatextual level creates further concerns. The meaning of particles does not change, as at most they may undergo a phonetic change (cf. bodaj ‘probably’, ponoć ‘they say’/‘apparently’, oczywiście ‘of course’). The discrepancy between the two levels is brought about mainly by changes taking place at the object level (e.g. mówię w prawdzie ‘I am telling the truth’ ˃ wprawdzie ‘admittedly’; wiem za pewne ‘I know for sure’ > zapewne ‘probably’). Thus, a class of particles is being formed that is a separate and formally distinct part of speech.","PeriodicalId":37336,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920spl.23.003.18044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on particles derived from object-level expressions, but operating at a higher, metatextual level. Such particles are sourced chiefly from speaker-oriented parentheticals composed of verba dicendi and verba sentiendi. Following the elision of parentheticals and other expressions, functional homonymy arises: a particle/a different part of speech (most commonly an adverb). This results in an uncertainty regarding the status of particles. The understanding of particles as parts of speech is also problematic due to the linguistic tradition which relies on the Latin name particula, meaning ‘a little part’/‘a particle’. The classification of expressions operating both at the object and the metatextual level creates further concerns. The meaning of particles does not change, as at most they may undergo a phonetic change (cf. bodaj ‘probably’, ponoć ‘they say’/‘apparently’, oczywiście ‘of course’). The discrepancy between the two levels is brought about mainly by changes taking place at the object level (e.g. mówię w prawdzie ‘I am telling the truth’ ˃ wprawdzie ‘admittedly’; wiem za pewne ‘I know for sure’ > zapewne ‘probably’). Thus, a class of particles is being formed that is a separate and formally distinct part of speech.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从对象级意义到元文本意义。波兰粒子的例子
本文主要关注从对象级表达式派生的粒子,但在更高的元文本级别上操作。这类助词主要来源于以说话人为导向的插入语,由间接语和间接语组成。省略圆括号和其他表达后,就出现了功能同音:一个小词/一个不同的词性(最常见的是副词)。这就造成了粒子状态的不确定性。由于语言传统依赖于拉丁语名称“partica”,意思是“一小部分”/“一个粒子”,因此将粒子理解为言语的一部分也是有问题的。同时在对象和元文本级别操作的表达式的分类产生了进一步的问题。粒子的意义不会改变,因为它们最多可能经历语音变化(参见bodaj“可能”,ponoki“他们说”/“显然”,oczywiście“当然”)。这两个层次之间的差异主要是由客体层次发生的变化引起的(例如mówię wprawdzie“我说的是实话”);wiem zapewne '我肯定知道' > zapewne '可能')。这样,就形成了一类粒子,它们是一个独立的、形式上不同的词性部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Polish Linguistics
Studies in Polish Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Agentive reading in the Middle: The structure of Polish reflexiva tantum Temporal progression in film retellings in Polish: Perspectives on the interaction of the imperfective aspect and narrative principles English-Sourced Direct and Indirect Borrowings in a New Lexicon of Polish Anglicisms Responding to Omicron: Speaker Commitment and Legitimisation in COVID-related Press Conferences Morphopragmatic View on the Ironic Use of Diminutives in Polish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1