Impact of mutant RAS on prognosis of patients after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases

Jia-Ming Liu, Wei Liu, Da Xu, Li-Jun Wang, Kun Wang, B. Xing
{"title":"Impact of mutant RAS on prognosis of patients after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases","authors":"Jia-Ming Liu, Wei Liu, Da Xu, Li-Jun Wang, Kun Wang, B. Xing","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo study the impact of RAS status on prognosis of patients after liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). \n \n \nMethods \nThe data of 545 consecutive CRLM patients who underwent liver resection at the Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 356 patients were eventually included into this study. There were 232 males and 124 females, with ages ranging from 21 to 83 years. The clinical and follow-up data of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were compared. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was compared by the log-rank test. Factors influencing survival of these patients were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 247 patients with wild-type RAS and 109 patients with mutant RAS, respectively. The median overall survival of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were 74 and 30 months respectively. Compared with mutant RAS patients, wild-type RAS patients had significantly better cumulative survival and disease free survival rates (both P 5 cm (HR=1.717, 95%CI: 1.102-2.637), and mutant RAS (HR=1.836, 95%CI: 1.322-2.550) were independent risk factors for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatic resection. \n \n \nConclusion \nMutant RAS was a poor prognostic factor of survival after liver resection in CRLM patients \n \n \nKey words: \nColorectal neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Liver metastases; RAS gene","PeriodicalId":10021,"journal":{"name":"中华肝胆外科杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝胆外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To study the impact of RAS status on prognosis of patients after liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). Methods The data of 545 consecutive CRLM patients who underwent liver resection at the Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 356 patients were eventually included into this study. There were 232 males and 124 females, with ages ranging from 21 to 83 years. The clinical and follow-up data of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were compared. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was compared by the log-rank test. Factors influencing survival of these patients were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results There were 247 patients with wild-type RAS and 109 patients with mutant RAS, respectively. The median overall survival of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were 74 and 30 months respectively. Compared with mutant RAS patients, wild-type RAS patients had significantly better cumulative survival and disease free survival rates (both P 5 cm (HR=1.717, 95%CI: 1.102-2.637), and mutant RAS (HR=1.836, 95%CI: 1.322-2.550) were independent risk factors for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatic resection. Conclusion Mutant RAS was a poor prognostic factor of survival after liver resection in CRLM patients Key words: Colorectal neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Liver metastases; RAS gene
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突变RAS对结直肠癌癌症肝转移肝切除术后患者预后的影响
目的探讨大肠癌肝转移(CRLM)肝切除术后RAS状态对患者预后的影响。方法回顾性分析2008年1月1日至2016年12月31日在北京大学癌症医院一期胰胆管切除术545例CRLM患者的临床资料。根据纳入和排除标准,356名患者最终被纳入本研究。共有232名男性和124名女性,年龄从21岁到83岁不等。比较了野生型和突变型RAS患者的临床和随访数据。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法进行评估,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。通过单变量和多变量Cox回归分析评估影响这些患者生存的因素。结果野生型RAS患者247例,突变型RAS患者109例。野生型和突变型RAS患者的中位总生存期分别为74个月和30个月。与突变型RAS患者相比,野生型RAS患者的累积生存率和无病生存率显著提高(P 5 cm(HR=1.717,95%CI:1.102-2.637)和突变型RAS(HR=1.836,95%CI:1.322-2.550)均为结直肠癌癌症肝转移患者肝切除后的独立危险因素。结论突变RAS是影响CRLM患者肝切除术后生存率的不良预后因素;肝切除术;肝转移;RAS基因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华肝胆外科杂志
中华肝胆外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7101
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association and supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, founded in 1995. The journal has the following columns: review, hot spotlight, academic thinking, thesis, experimental research, short thesis, case report, synthesis, etc. The journal has been recognized by Beida Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences). Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery has been included in famous databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of China Science Citation Database (with Extended Version) and so on, and it is one of the national key academic journals under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic efficacy of external and internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice Combined postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis Retrograde approach to the retroperitoneal Castleman disease: a case report and literature review Application of laparoscopy in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer Hepatic biloma after minimally invasive interventional therapies: treatment and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1