Jia-Ming Liu, Wei Liu, Da Xu, Li-Jun Wang, Kun Wang, B. Xing
{"title":"Impact of mutant RAS on prognosis of patients after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases","authors":"Jia-Ming Liu, Wei Liu, Da Xu, Li-Jun Wang, Kun Wang, B. Xing","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo study the impact of RAS status on prognosis of patients after liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). \n \n \nMethods \nThe data of 545 consecutive CRLM patients who underwent liver resection at the Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 356 patients were eventually included into this study. There were 232 males and 124 females, with ages ranging from 21 to 83 years. The clinical and follow-up data of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were compared. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was compared by the log-rank test. Factors influencing survival of these patients were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 247 patients with wild-type RAS and 109 patients with mutant RAS, respectively. The median overall survival of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were 74 and 30 months respectively. Compared with mutant RAS patients, wild-type RAS patients had significantly better cumulative survival and disease free survival rates (both P 5 cm (HR=1.717, 95%CI: 1.102-2.637), and mutant RAS (HR=1.836, 95%CI: 1.322-2.550) were independent risk factors for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatic resection. \n \n \nConclusion \nMutant RAS was a poor prognostic factor of survival after liver resection in CRLM patients \n \n \nKey words: \nColorectal neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Liver metastases; RAS gene","PeriodicalId":10021,"journal":{"name":"中华肝胆外科杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝胆外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To study the impact of RAS status on prognosis of patients after liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).
Methods
The data of 545 consecutive CRLM patients who underwent liver resection at the Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 356 patients were eventually included into this study. There were 232 males and 124 females, with ages ranging from 21 to 83 years. The clinical and follow-up data of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were compared. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was compared by the log-rank test. Factors influencing survival of these patients were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.
Results
There were 247 patients with wild-type RAS and 109 patients with mutant RAS, respectively. The median overall survival of patients with wild-type and mutant RAS were 74 and 30 months respectively. Compared with mutant RAS patients, wild-type RAS patients had significantly better cumulative survival and disease free survival rates (both P 5 cm (HR=1.717, 95%CI: 1.102-2.637), and mutant RAS (HR=1.836, 95%CI: 1.322-2.550) were independent risk factors for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatic resection.
Conclusion
Mutant RAS was a poor prognostic factor of survival after liver resection in CRLM patients
Key words:
Colorectal neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Liver metastases; RAS gene
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association and supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, founded in 1995. The journal has the following columns: review, hot spotlight, academic thinking, thesis, experimental research, short thesis, case report, synthesis, etc. The journal has been recognized by Beida Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences).
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery has been included in famous databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of China Science Citation Database (with Extended Version) and so on, and it is one of the national key academic journals under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology.