Questionnaire Data From the Revision of a Chinese Version of Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale

Qing-Lan Liu, Fei Wang, Wen-Jing Yan, K. Peng, J. Sui, Chuan-Peng Hu
{"title":"Questionnaire Data From the Revision of a Chinese Version of Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale","authors":"Qing-Lan Liu, Fei Wang, Wen-Jing Yan, K. Peng, J. Sui, Chuan-Peng Hu","doi":"10.5334/JOPD.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We reported a questionnaire dataset accumulated from the revision of a Chinese version of Free Will and Determinism Scale Plus (FAD+). In this dataset, we collected data from 1232 participants. The questionnaires used in data collection included the FAD+ and 13 other widely-used questionnaires or tests (for example, the Big Five In-ventory, the Multidimensional Locus of Control, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, the General and Personal Belief in a Just World Scale, the Chinese Disgust Sensitivity Scale, the Moral Identity Questionnaire, the Moral Self-Image Scale). The sample size for these questionnaires are different, ranging from 33 to 1100. Our preliminary analysis revealed that scores of these scales are reliable (Cronbach's alpha: .52 ~ .85, McDonald’s omega: .63 ~ .90). These data can be used for both research and educa-tional purposes, e.g., examining cultural differences and measurement invariance on belief in free will, locus of control, belief in just world. All data, together with their codebooks and manipulation code, are available at osf.io/t2nsw/","PeriodicalId":91028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of open psychology data","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of open psychology data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/JOPD.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We reported a questionnaire dataset accumulated from the revision of a Chinese version of Free Will and Determinism Scale Plus (FAD+). In this dataset, we collected data from 1232 participants. The questionnaires used in data collection included the FAD+ and 13 other widely-used questionnaires or tests (for example, the Big Five In-ventory, the Multidimensional Locus of Control, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, the General and Personal Belief in a Just World Scale, the Chinese Disgust Sensitivity Scale, the Moral Identity Questionnaire, the Moral Self-Image Scale). The sample size for these questionnaires are different, ranging from 33 to 1100. Our preliminary analysis revealed that scores of these scales are reliable (Cronbach's alpha: .52 ~ .85, McDonald’s omega: .63 ~ .90). These data can be used for both research and educa-tional purposes, e.g., examining cultural differences and measurement invariance on belief in free will, locus of control, belief in just world. All data, together with their codebooks and manipulation code, are available at osf.io/t2nsw/
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《自由意志与决定论加量表》中文版修订的问卷数据
我们报告了一个通过修订中文版的自由意志和决定论量表(FAD+)而积累的问卷数据集。在这个数据集中,我们收集了1232名参与者的数据。数据收集中使用的问卷包括FAD+和其他13种广泛使用的问卷或测试(例如,五大事件量表、多维控制点、罗森伯格自尊量表、对公正世界的普遍和个人信仰量表、中国人厌恶感量表、道德同一性问卷、道德自我形象量表)。这些问卷的样本量各不相同,从33份到1100份不等。我们的初步分析表明,这些量表的分数是可靠的(克朗巴赫α:.52~.85,麦当劳ω:.63~.90)。这些数据既可用于研究,也可用于教育目的,例如,检验文化差异和对自由意志、控制点和正义世界信仰的测量不变性。所有数据,以及它们的代码簿和操作代码,都可以在osf.io/t2nsw上获得/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Data from “A Registered Report Testing the Effect of Sleep on DRM False Memory: Greater Lure and Veridical Recall but Fewer Intrusions After Sleep” Data from the Paper Entitled “Application of a Bayesian Approach for Exploring the Impact of Syllable Frequency in Handwritten Picture Naming” A New Procedure and Stimulus Set for Examining Cross-Modality Mental Rotation Preliminary Data from the Small World of Singlish Words Project: Examining Responses to Common Singlish Words A Dataset of 108 Novel Noun-Noun Compound Words with Active and Passive Interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1