The enhanced susceptibility of alcohol-free and low alcohol beers to microbiological spoilage: implications for draught dispense

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of The Institute of Brewing Pub Date : 2021-10-07 DOI:10.1002/jib.670
David E. Quain
{"title":"The enhanced susceptibility of alcohol-free and low alcohol beers to microbiological spoilage: implications for draught dispense","authors":"David E. Quain","doi":"10.1002/jib.670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The spoilage of six alcohol-free (AFB, ≤ 0.05% ABV) and two low alcohol beers (LAB, ≤ 1.2% ABV) was assessed by challenge testing with microflora from draught beer. Spoilage of AFB and LABs was greater (2-5 x) than two ‘control’ premium lager beers (4.5% ABV). Measurement of spoilage by challenge testing was reproducible irrespective of the source of draught beer microflora (public house, date, or beer style). Spoilage was correlated with the level of ‘fermentables’ (glucose + fructose + maltose) in the product but was also dependent on the availability of micronutrients. The addition of ethanol (2-8% ABV) to three AFBs and a LAB resulted only in a modest inhibition of spoilage (collectively 24% at 8% ABV) and, it is suggested, that the complexity of the product composition provides protection. Given the vulnerability of AFBs and LABs to spoilage and susceptibility to microorganisms that are usually supressed by ethanol, it is strongly recommended that low or alcohol-free beer styles are not offered to consumers in the on-trade by conventional long line dispense systems. It is suggested that AFB and LABs in a draught format require innovative, hygienically designed stand-alone dispense systems that remove or significantly minimise the risk of microbiological contamination, growth and associated product spoilage. © 2021 The Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</p>","PeriodicalId":17279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Institute of Brewing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Institute of Brewing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jib.670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The spoilage of six alcohol-free (AFB, ≤ 0.05% ABV) and two low alcohol beers (LAB, ≤ 1.2% ABV) was assessed by challenge testing with microflora from draught beer. Spoilage of AFB and LABs was greater (2-5 x) than two ‘control’ premium lager beers (4.5% ABV). Measurement of spoilage by challenge testing was reproducible irrespective of the source of draught beer microflora (public house, date, or beer style). Spoilage was correlated with the level of ‘fermentables’ (glucose + fructose + maltose) in the product but was also dependent on the availability of micronutrients. The addition of ethanol (2-8% ABV) to three AFBs and a LAB resulted only in a modest inhibition of spoilage (collectively 24% at 8% ABV) and, it is suggested, that the complexity of the product composition provides protection. Given the vulnerability of AFBs and LABs to spoilage and susceptibility to microorganisms that are usually supressed by ethanol, it is strongly recommended that low or alcohol-free beer styles are not offered to consumers in the on-trade by conventional long line dispense systems. It is suggested that AFB and LABs in a draught format require innovative, hygienically designed stand-alone dispense systems that remove or significantly minimise the risk of microbiological contamination, growth and associated product spoilage. © 2021 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无酒精和低酒精啤酒对微生物变质的敏感性增强:对生啤分配的影响
采用生啤微生物菌群攻毒试验,评价了6种无酒精啤酒(AFB, ABV≤0.05%)和2种低酒精啤酒(LAB, ABV≤1.2%)的腐败程度。AFB和LABs的腐败比两种“对照”优质拉格啤酒(4.5% ABV)更大(2-5倍)。不管生啤菌群的来源(酒吧、日期或啤酒类型)如何,挑战试验对腐败的测量都是可重复的。腐败与产品中“可发酵物”(葡萄糖+果糖+麦芽糖)的含量有关,但也取决于微量营养素的可用性。将乙醇(2-8% ABV)添加到三个afb和一个LAB中,只产生了适度的腐败抑制作用(在8% ABV下总共抑制了24%),这表明,产品组成的复杂性提供了保护。鉴于afb和实验室的脆弱性,腐败和易感性的微生物,通常被乙醇抑制,强烈建议低或无酒精啤酒风格不提供给消费者在贸易中通过传统的长线分配系统。建议AFB和实验室在草稿格式中需要创新的,卫生设计的独立分配系统,以消除或显着降低微生物污染,生长和相关产品腐败的风险。©2021 The Institute of Brewing;蒸馏
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The Institute of Brewing
Journal of The Institute of Brewing 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal has been publishing original research for over 125 years relating to brewing, fermentation, distilling, raw materials and by-products. Research ranges from the fundamental to applied and is from universities, research institutes and industry laboratories worldwide. The scope of the Journal is cereal based beers, wines and spirits. Manuscripts on cider may also be submitted as they have been since 1911. Manuscripts on fruit based wines and spirits are not within the scope of the Journal of the Institute of Brewing.
期刊最新文献
Effective strategies to maximise dextrin formation in brewing The lowering of gushing potential from hydrophobin by the use of proteolytic enzymes Tracking dry gin volatile organic compounds over distillation: a time course study Modelling of beer sensory staleness based on flavour instability parameters Untargeted metabolomic profiling of 100% malt beers versus those containing barley adjunct
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1