Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge-sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Knowledge and Process Management Pub Date : 2021-11-09 DOI:10.1002/kpm.1693
Jorge Muniz Jr., Daniel Wintersberger, Jacky L. F. Hong
{"title":"Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge-sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line","authors":"Jorge Muniz Jr.,&nbsp;Daniel Wintersberger,&nbsp;Jacky L. F. Hong","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge-intensive, white-collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue-collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on-site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"29 2","pages":"132-146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge-intensive, white-collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue-collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on-site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工人和管理者对促进知识共享因素的判断:来自巴西汽车装配线的见解
本文对支持汽车装配线隐性知识共享的关键因素进行了探讨和排序。现有关于知识共享的研究绝大多数集中在知识密集型的白领工作上,尽管承认蓝领工人隐性知识的重要性,但知识管理和运营管理文献对制造环境的关注有限,特别是在装配线上工作的环境。本研究利用了巴西汽车模块化联盟(MC)的一条汽车装配线的工人和工厂经理的定性和定量数据,这是一种独特的生产概念,生产大批量和高品种的汽车。MC与六家跨国供应商合作,它们直接在装配线上互动,共享物理空间、责任和质量控制。研究的定性要素包括访谈、非正式谈话和现场观察。使用内容分析对转录进行解释。定量因素包括通过使用层次分析法(AHP)对不同因素进行排序,比较工人和管理人员对促进知识共享的不同因素的相对重要性的调查反应。研究结果比较和对比了管理者和员工在知识共享方面的观点,参考了与人员和流程相关的因素。讨论了基于知识、人力资源管理和工作管理的管理行动的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Unethical favouritism and KH: The mediating role of organisational injustice The next event will be held with more quality: Identifying and prioritizing barriers to knowledge management in sports events Context-driven implementation strategies: Exploring three approaches to implement a lean capability framework within a global production company Toward effective KMS measurement: Usage statistics vs. perceived value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1