Regeneration and 'Placemaking' without Governance in a Grey field Context: The Transformation of Salisbury, Queensland, Australia

Q2 Social Sciences Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.2148/benv.49.1.115
Sébastien Darchen
{"title":"Regeneration and 'Placemaking' without Governance in a Grey field Context: The Transformation of Salisbury, Queensland, Australia","authors":"Sébastien Darchen","doi":"10.2148/benv.49.1.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines how the concept of 'place' could be integrated in the regeneration process for the industrial suburb of Salisbury in Queensland, Australia and how the three Bs can be used as a framework to study the evolution and the possible futures of the suburb. The paper draws\n on data collected from interviews with stakeholders as well as the outcomes of a Design Studio course as well as a panel organized for a University of Queensland event on placemaking in 2018 as a practical way of exploring potential scenarios for place-based regeneration of the suburb. The\n aim of the paper is both to understand the current transformation process of this suburb and to develop recommendations for a regeneration process integrating the concept of 'place' in the South East Queensland (SEQ) context where regeneration principles are not well integrated into local\n plans for the suburb of Salisbury. The paper highlights two conflicting views about the regeneration process and placemaking. The conclusion outlines recommendations to promote a regeneration process that could be adapted for both the Salisbury and the grey fields context for South East Queensland\n and would reconcile the two visions of what the regeneration of Salisbury should be.","PeriodicalId":53715,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.49.1.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines how the concept of 'place' could be integrated in the regeneration process for the industrial suburb of Salisbury in Queensland, Australia and how the three Bs can be used as a framework to study the evolution and the possible futures of the suburb. The paper draws on data collected from interviews with stakeholders as well as the outcomes of a Design Studio course as well as a panel organized for a University of Queensland event on placemaking in 2018 as a practical way of exploring potential scenarios for place-based regeneration of the suburb. The aim of the paper is both to understand the current transformation process of this suburb and to develop recommendations for a regeneration process integrating the concept of 'place' in the South East Queensland (SEQ) context where regeneration principles are not well integrated into local plans for the suburb of Salisbury. The paper highlights two conflicting views about the regeneration process and placemaking. The conclusion outlines recommendations to promote a regeneration process that could be adapted for both the Salisbury and the grey fields context for South East Queensland and would reconcile the two visions of what the regeneration of Salisbury should be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灰色地带中没有治理的再生和“场所创造”:澳大利亚昆士兰州索尔兹伯里的改造
本文探讨了如何将“地方”概念融入澳大利亚昆士兰州索尔兹伯里工业郊区的再生过程中,以及如何将三个b作为研究郊区演变和可能未来的框架。该论文利用了从利益相关者访谈中收集的数据,以及设计工作室课程的结果,以及为2018年昆士兰大学举办的关于场所营造的活动组织的小组,作为探索基于场所的郊区再生的潜在方案的实用方法。本文的目的是了解这个郊区当前的转型过程,并在昆士兰东南部(SEQ)的背景下,为再生原则没有很好地融入索尔兹伯里郊区的当地规划的再生过程中整合“地方”概念提出建议。本文强调了关于再生过程和场所营造的两种相互冲突的观点。结论概述了促进再生过程的建议,该过程可以适应索尔兹伯里和昆士兰东南部灰色地带的背景,并将协调索尔兹伯里再生的两种愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Built Environment
Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Carceral Displacement: The Root Shock of Mass Criminalization Displacement in Place: Root Shock in the Pearse Street Community, Dublin Root Shock's Missing Appendix Using Situation Analysis for Critical Policy Studies and Beyond Root Shock as Social Discipline Marginalization and Racism in Irish Social, Asylum, and Refugee Policies 'We Couldn't Get the Big Win' A Situation Analysis of the Stress of Gentrification at Differing Points in the Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1