{"title":"The Russia-USA legal dispute over the straits of the Northern Sea Route and similar case of the Northwest Passage","authors":"A. Todorov","doi":"10.17238/ISSN2221-2698.2017.29.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UDC [341+327](47+73)(045) DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.29.74 The Russia-USA legal dispute over the straits of the Northern Sea Route and similar case of the Northwest Passage © Andrey А. Todorov, Cand. Sci. (Law). E-mail: atodorov85@gmail.com Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow, Russia. Abstract. This article examines the legal status of the Northern Sea Route (NSR), which has been a subject of dispute between the Soviet Union\\Russia and the United States for over fifty years. The main legal issue of the analysis is the question whether straits of the Northern Sea Route are international, where the freedom of navigation applies, or whether the straits are internal waters of Russia and they are subjected to national rules of navigation. The case of the Northern Sea Route straits is considered from a historical perspective and with references to relevant provisions of the contemporary international law of the sea. A similar dispute between Canada and the USA over the Northwest Passage is assessed as well. The author concludes that the USA has a disadvantageous position in the disputes due to difficulties in proving that both routes can meet necessary criteria for international straits developed by the international law. So far, the debate on legal status of the NSR waters is more of theoretical nature and has no practical implications. However, the situation might change with the Arctic sea ice melting and Russia planning to use the NSR on a much larger international scale.","PeriodicalId":30489,"journal":{"name":"Arktika i Sever","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arktika i Sever","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17238/ISSN2221-2698.2017.29.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
俄美关于北海航道海峡的法律纠纷及类似的西北航道案件
UDC [341+327](47+73)(045) DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.29.74俄美关于北方航道海峡的法律纠纷和西北航道的类似案例©Andrey А。托多罗夫,萤石。科学。(法律)。电子邮件:atodorov85@gmail.com莫斯科国立语言大学,俄罗斯莫斯科。摘要本文探讨了北方海路(NSR)的法律地位,这是苏联、俄罗斯和美国之间50多年来一直存在争议的主题。分析的主要法律问题是北方航道的海峡是否属于国际海峡,适用航行自由,还是属于俄罗斯的内水,受国家航行规则的约束。从历史的角度并参照当代国际海洋法的有关规定来审议北方航道海峡的情况。加拿大和美国之间关于西北航道的类似争端也被评估。笔者认为,由于难以证明这两条航线都符合国际法所制定的国际海峡的必要标准,美国在争端中处于不利地位。到目前为止,关于“噪音感应强水域”法律地位的争论更多的是理论性的,没有实际意义。然而,随着北极海冰融化,俄罗斯计划在更大的国际范围内使用北极航道,情况可能会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。