Current clinical approach to pediatric keratoconus patients

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Expert Review of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1080/17469899.2022.2085557
I. Toprak, D. Kılıç
{"title":"Current clinical approach to pediatric keratoconus patients","authors":"I. Toprak, D. Kılıç","doi":"10.1080/17469899.2022.2085557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Due to structural differences between pediatric and adult corneas, keratoconus (KC) is considered more aggressive in pediatrics than in adults. It is controversial whether therapeutic intervention in pediatric KC should differ from adult KC. Areas covered We investigate if there is a substantial difference between pediatric and adult KC regarding disease severity and progression rate, factors important for treatment timing and prognosis. Then, feasibility of current treatment modalities is discussed based on current evidence. Expert opinion Despite several conflicting reports, pediatric KC is more severe at initial diagnosis with faster progression. Progression can be tracked in a variety of ways, including with the Belin ABCD progression system. Controlling ocular allergy and eye rubbing is the first step in treatment. The epithelium-off Dresden protocol remains the gold standard CXL approach to stop progression in pediatric KC, whereas epithelium-off accelerated CXL might be an alternative. In pediatric patients, both penetrating and lamellar keratoplasty can be challenging; however, lamellar keratoplasty seems to offer the advantage of lower graft rejection rate. Epithelium-on CXL, intracorneal ring segment implantation, excimer laser ablation + CXL protocols are not recommended in pediatric KC. Nevertheless, there remains a need for evidence-based clinical practical guidelines in pediatric KC.","PeriodicalId":39989,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","volume":"17 1","pages":"105 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2085557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Due to structural differences between pediatric and adult corneas, keratoconus (KC) is considered more aggressive in pediatrics than in adults. It is controversial whether therapeutic intervention in pediatric KC should differ from adult KC. Areas covered We investigate if there is a substantial difference between pediatric and adult KC regarding disease severity and progression rate, factors important for treatment timing and prognosis. Then, feasibility of current treatment modalities is discussed based on current evidence. Expert opinion Despite several conflicting reports, pediatric KC is more severe at initial diagnosis with faster progression. Progression can be tracked in a variety of ways, including with the Belin ABCD progression system. Controlling ocular allergy and eye rubbing is the first step in treatment. The epithelium-off Dresden protocol remains the gold standard CXL approach to stop progression in pediatric KC, whereas epithelium-off accelerated CXL might be an alternative. In pediatric patients, both penetrating and lamellar keratoplasty can be challenging; however, lamellar keratoplasty seems to offer the advantage of lower graft rejection rate. Epithelium-on CXL, intracorneal ring segment implantation, excimer laser ablation + CXL protocols are not recommended in pediatric KC. Nevertheless, there remains a need for evidence-based clinical practical guidelines in pediatric KC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目前小儿圆锥角膜患者的临床治疗方法
由于儿童和成人角膜的结构差异,圆锥角膜(KC)被认为在儿科比成人更具侵袭性。儿童KC的治疗干预是否应该与成人KC不同,这是有争议的。涵盖的领域我们调查了儿童和成人KC在疾病严重程度和进展率、治疗时机和预后的重要因素方面是否存在实质性差异。然后,根据现有证据讨论了当前治疗方式的可行性。专家意见尽管有几个相互矛盾的报告,儿科KC在最初诊断时更严重,进展更快。进程可以通过多种方式进行追踪,包括使用Belin ABCD进程系统。控制眼部过敏和揉眼是治疗的第一步。上皮脱落德累斯顿方案仍然是阻止儿童KC进展的金标准CXL方法,而上皮脱落加速CXL可能是另一种选择。在儿科患者中,穿透性角膜移植术和板层性角膜移植术都具有挑战性;然而,板层角膜移植术似乎具有较低的移植排斥率的优点。在儿童KC中,不推荐使用上皮上CXL、角膜内环段植入术、准分子激光消融+ CXL方案。然而,儿童KC仍需要循证临床实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Expert Review of Ophthalmology Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The worldwide problem of visual impairment is set to increase, as we are seeing increased longevity in developed countries. This will produce a crisis in vision care unless concerted action is taken. The substantial value that ophthalmic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases has led to intense research efforts in this area in recent years, with corresponding improvements in treatment, ophthalmic instrumentation and surgical techniques. As a result, the future for ophthalmology holds great promise as further exciting and innovative developments unfold.
期刊最新文献
How Genome-Wide Association Studies Transform Care for Patients at Risk of Glaucoma. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS): a systematic review, implications for the sans case definition Stem cell therapy in retinal diseases: current evidence Morphometric analysis of orbital CT scan in a Jordanian sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1