Service workers and “difficult customers”: quality challenges at the front line

I. Gal, D. Yagil, G. Luria
{"title":"Service workers and “difficult customers”: quality challenges at the front line","authors":"I. Gal, D. Yagil, G. Luria","doi":"10.1108/IJQSS-05-2020-0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to contribute to the literature on service quality and value co-creation and co-destruction by unpacking the phenomenon described as “difficult customers”, which has many associated costs for service organizations. The paper examines how frontline service employees make sense of and react to client behaviors that disrupt service processes.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis is a qualitative study with 128 frontline workers, who were interviewed about their perceptions, explanations and reactions to problem-related customers, using a sensemaking perspective.\n\n\nFindings\nContent analysis revealed 17 themes related to workers' perceptions, explanations and reactions to problem-related customers. Workers classify behaviors of problem-related customers in terms exceeding the single notion of intentionality that dominates the literature, instead referring to the degree of both controllability and malevolence of customers. Service workers choose a wide range of behavioral reactions that have not been studied before.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nA convenience sample, although large, limits generalizability. Suggestions for future quantitative research are proposed.\n\n\nPractical implications\nBased on the findings, the authors suggest specific directions related to managerial policy and organizational practices related to training and employee empowerment and service recovery routines.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study introduces a new theoretical notion of “problem-related customers”, set within a value co-creation context. It presents findings that enable deeper understanding of the emotional and behavioral reactions of frontline workers to service disruptions and offers multiple scholarly contributions, new research directions and managerial insights that can help to improve service recovery and service quality\n","PeriodicalId":14403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-05-2020-0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the literature on service quality and value co-creation and co-destruction by unpacking the phenomenon described as “difficult customers”, which has many associated costs for service organizations. The paper examines how frontline service employees make sense of and react to client behaviors that disrupt service processes. Design/methodology/approach This is a qualitative study with 128 frontline workers, who were interviewed about their perceptions, explanations and reactions to problem-related customers, using a sensemaking perspective. Findings Content analysis revealed 17 themes related to workers' perceptions, explanations and reactions to problem-related customers. Workers classify behaviors of problem-related customers in terms exceeding the single notion of intentionality that dominates the literature, instead referring to the degree of both controllability and malevolence of customers. Service workers choose a wide range of behavioral reactions that have not been studied before. Research limitations/implications A convenience sample, although large, limits generalizability. Suggestions for future quantitative research are proposed. Practical implications Based on the findings, the authors suggest specific directions related to managerial policy and organizational practices related to training and employee empowerment and service recovery routines. Originality/value The study introduces a new theoretical notion of “problem-related customers”, set within a value co-creation context. It presents findings that enable deeper understanding of the emotional and behavioral reactions of frontline workers to service disruptions and offers multiple scholarly contributions, new research directions and managerial insights that can help to improve service recovery and service quality
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务工作者与“难缠的客户”:一线的质量挑战
目的本文的目的是通过揭示被描述为“困难客户”的现象,为服务质量和价值的共同创造和共同破坏的文献做出贡献,这对服务组织来说有很多相关成本。本文研究了一线服务员工如何理解和应对扰乱服务流程的客户行为。设计/方法论/方法这是一项针对128名一线员工的定性研究,他们接受了采访,了解了他们对问题相关客户的看法、解释和反应,并使用了感知视角。FindingsContent分析揭示了17个与员工对问题相关客户的看法、解释和反应有关的主题。工作人员对与问题相关的客户的行为进行分类,超过了文献中占主导地位的单一意向性概念,而是指客户的可控性和恶意程度。服务人员选择了一系列以前没有研究过的行为反应。研究局限性/含义方便的样本虽然很大,但限制了可推广性。对今后的定量研究提出了建议。实际含义基于研究结果,作者提出了与培训、员工赋权和服务恢复程序相关的管理政策和组织实践的具体方向。独创性/价值本研究引入了一个新的理论概念,即“与问题相关的客户”,设置在价值共创的背景下。它提出的研究结果有助于更深入地了解一线员工对服务中断的情绪和行为反应,并提供了多项学术贡献、新的研究方向和管理见解,有助于提高服务恢复和服务质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences seeks to explore various aspects of quality and services as closely interrelated phenomena in the context of ongoing transformation processes of organizations and societies. Thus the journals'' scope is not limited to micro perspectives of organizational and management related issues. It seeks further to explore patterns, behaviors, processes, mechanisms, principles and consequences related to quality and services in a broad range of organizational and social/global processes. These processes embrace cultural, economic, social, environmental and even global dimensions in order to better understand the past, to better diagnose the current situations and hence to design better the future. The journal seeks to embrace a holistic view of quality and service sector management and explicitly promotes the emerging field of ‘quality and service sciences’.The journal is an open forum and one of the main channels for communication of multi- and inter- disciplinary research and practices.
期刊最新文献
Elevating service startup survival through strategic service quality Quality leadership, technology integration and patient care quality across countries: moderating roles of national culture and infrastructure development After-sales service and brand reputation: a case of kitchen appliance industry After-sales service and brand reputation: a case of kitchen appliance industry Brand addiction: Wow! or woe?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1