Manifestations of workplace ostracism: an insight into academics' psychological well-being

T. Fatima, A. Bilal, Muhammad Imran, Ambreen Sarwar
{"title":"Manifestations of workplace ostracism: an insight into academics' psychological well-being","authors":"T. Fatima, A. Bilal, Muhammad Imran, Ambreen Sarwar","doi":"10.1108/SAJBS-03-2019-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeOstracism is a subjective and relative concept that renders itself to multiple manifestations and context-specific outcomes. Therefore, this study identified specific behaviours that are perceived as workplace ostracism by teaching faculty of Pakistani Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs). Building on belongingness theory, the ramifications of ostracism on psychological well-being are outlined along with the context-specific factors that shape these outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA phenomenological approach was adopted, and 30 semi-structured interviews from the teaching faculty of HEIs in Lahore, Pakistan, were conducted. The transcribed interviews were coded, and an inductive thematic analysis via NVivo 12 Plus software was used to generate themes and sub-themes.FindingsFive behaviours, i.e. biased treatment, exclusion from formal and informal interactions, interpersonal alienation, delayed sharing or hiding of knowledge, lack of work-related, social and emotional support constituted the acts of ostracism in studied HEIs. The psychological well-being of faculty suffered in terms of negative emotions, reduced job, career and life satisfaction in their work and family life. The contextual factors deciding the intensity of outcomes resulting from workplace encompassed head of department (HOD) support, pay, friendly relations, fear of confrontation, alternative job options and designation of faculty members.Originality/valueThis research is a pioneer in using an in-depth phenomenological approach to define a behavioural typology of ostracism in academia. Moreover, a much needed holistic outcome of psychological well-being is explored in work and non-work domains and further elucidated in light of context-specific factors.","PeriodicalId":55618,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Business Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-03-2019-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

PurposeOstracism is a subjective and relative concept that renders itself to multiple manifestations and context-specific outcomes. Therefore, this study identified specific behaviours that are perceived as workplace ostracism by teaching faculty of Pakistani Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs). Building on belongingness theory, the ramifications of ostracism on psychological well-being are outlined along with the context-specific factors that shape these outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA phenomenological approach was adopted, and 30 semi-structured interviews from the teaching faculty of HEIs in Lahore, Pakistan, were conducted. The transcribed interviews were coded, and an inductive thematic analysis via NVivo 12 Plus software was used to generate themes and sub-themes.FindingsFive behaviours, i.e. biased treatment, exclusion from formal and informal interactions, interpersonal alienation, delayed sharing or hiding of knowledge, lack of work-related, social and emotional support constituted the acts of ostracism in studied HEIs. The psychological well-being of faculty suffered in terms of negative emotions, reduced job, career and life satisfaction in their work and family life. The contextual factors deciding the intensity of outcomes resulting from workplace encompassed head of department (HOD) support, pay, friendly relations, fear of confrontation, alternative job options and designation of faculty members.Originality/valueThis research is a pioneer in using an in-depth phenomenological approach to define a behavioural typology of ostracism in academia. Moreover, a much needed holistic outcome of psychological well-being is explored in work and non-work domains and further elucidated in light of context-specific factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职场排斥的表现:对学者心理健康的洞察
目的排斥主义是一个主观的、相对的概念,它表现为多种表现形式和特定的语境结果。因此,本研究确定了巴基斯坦高等教育机构(HEI)教师认为的工作场所排斥的具体行为。在归属理论的基础上,概述了排斥对心理健康的影响,以及形成这些结果的特定环境因素。设计/方法论/方法采用现象学方法,对巴基斯坦拉合尔高等学校的教师进行了30次半结构化访谈。转录的访谈被编码,并通过NVivo 12 Plus软件进行归纳主题分析,以生成主题和子主题。发现在所研究的高等教育中,五种行为,即偏见对待、被排除在正式和非正式互动之外、人际疏远、延迟分享或隐藏知识、缺乏与工作相关的社会和情感支持,构成了排斥行为。教师的心理健康状况受到负面情绪的影响,在工作和家庭生活中工作、职业和生活满意度下降。决定工作场所结果强度的背景因素包括系主任(HOD)的支持、薪酬、友好关系、对对抗的恐惧、替代工作选择和教员的指定。原创性/价值这项研究是在学术界使用深入的现象学方法来定义排斥行为类型学的先驱。此外,在工作和非工作领域探索了一种急需的心理幸福感的整体结果,并根据具体的环境因素进一步阐明了这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Fostering sustainable employability: the nexus of social support and career competencies in healthcare Financial awareness, investment strategies and investor satisfaction: a multilayered empirical model testing in the Indian context Analytical modeling of perceived authenticity in AI assistants: application of PLS-predict algorithm and importance-performance map analysis Manifestations of loan growth – profitability and non-performing loans – a study of the Indian banking sector Do justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices affect organizational citizenship behavior through affective commitment? Evidence from the information technology industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1