Restructuring Euro Area Sovereign Debt: Have the Options Narrowed?

IF 2 Q1 LAW Journal of Financial Regulation Pub Date : 2020-06-25 DOI:10.1093/jfr/fjaa003
W. M. C. Weidemaier
{"title":"Restructuring Euro Area Sovereign Debt: Have the Options Narrowed?","authors":"W. M. C. Weidemaier","doi":"10.1093/jfr/fjaa003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Essay examines the intersection between two key attributes of sovereign debt governance in the Euro Area. First, sovereigns mostly issue bonds governed by their own law. This “local law advantage” should make debt restructuring comparatively easy, for the sovereign can change the law to reduce its debt. The second attribute is the so-called Euro CAC, a contractbased restructuring mechanism mandated by the Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). Euro CACs let a bondholder supermajority approve a restructuring and bind dissenters. Since 2013, nearly all Euro Area sovereign debt has included the clause. Many believe the ESM Treaty requires governments to use the Euro CAC to restructure. But if so, the Treaty is a suicide pact, for the design of the Euro CAC is flawed. In a meaningful subset of cases, the clause will not provide adequate debt relief. This Essay makes two primary contributions. First, using an Italian restructuring as an example, it explains why the ESM Treaty does not, in fact, require the use of the Euro CAC. Second, it examines the legal constraints—the most pertinent of which derive from the European Convention on Human Rights—that do restrict the use of local law advantage.","PeriodicalId":42830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jfr/fjaa003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaa003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Essay examines the intersection between two key attributes of sovereign debt governance in the Euro Area. First, sovereigns mostly issue bonds governed by their own law. This “local law advantage” should make debt restructuring comparatively easy, for the sovereign can change the law to reduce its debt. The second attribute is the so-called Euro CAC, a contractbased restructuring mechanism mandated by the Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). Euro CACs let a bondholder supermajority approve a restructuring and bind dissenters. Since 2013, nearly all Euro Area sovereign debt has included the clause. Many believe the ESM Treaty requires governments to use the Euro CAC to restructure. But if so, the Treaty is a suicide pact, for the design of the Euro CAC is flawed. In a meaningful subset of cases, the clause will not provide adequate debt relief. This Essay makes two primary contributions. First, using an Italian restructuring as an example, it explains why the ESM Treaty does not, in fact, require the use of the Euro CAC. Second, it examines the legal constraints—the most pertinent of which derive from the European Convention on Human Rights—that do restrict the use of local law advantage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重组欧元区主权债务:选择余地缩小了吗?
本文考察了欧元区主权债务治理的两个关键特征之间的交叉点。首先,主权国家大多发行受本国法律管辖的债券。这种“地方法律优势”应该会使债务重组相对容易,因为主权国家可以修改法律来减少债务。第二个属性是所谓的欧洲CAC,这是一个由《建立欧洲稳定机制条约》(ESM)授权的基于合同的重组机制。欧元CAC允许债券持有人以绝对多数批准重组,并约束持不同意见者。自2013年以来,几乎所有欧元区主权债务都包含了该条款。许多人认为,ESM条约要求各国政府利用欧洲CAC进行重组。但如果是这样的话,该条约就是一个自杀式的协议,因为欧洲CAC的设计是有缺陷的。在一部分有意义的情况下,该条款不会提供足够的债务减免。这篇文章有两个主要贡献。首先,以意大利的重组为例,它解释了为什么《ESM条约》实际上不要求使用欧洲CAC。其次,它审查了法律约束——其中最相关的来自《欧洲人权公约》——这些约束确实限制了当地法律优势的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security in Central Banking Enhancing Repo Market Transparency: The EU Securities Financing Transactions Regulation Correction to: Could it Happen in the EU? An Analysis of Loss Distributionbetween Shareholders and AT1 Bondholders under EU Law Ten Years of the Single Supervisory Mechanism: Looking into the Past, Navigating into the Future “Tis new to thee’: response to Gruenewald, Knijp, Schoenmaker, and van Tilburg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1