Belief in karma is associated with perceived (but not actual) trustworthiness

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Judgment and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500009141
How Hwee Ong, A. Evans, R. Nelissen, I. van Beest
{"title":"Belief in karma is associated with perceived (but not actual)\n trustworthiness","authors":"How Hwee Ong, A. Evans, R. Nelissen, I. van Beest","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Believers of karma believe in ethical causation where good and bad\n outcomes can be traced to past moral and immoral acts. Karmic belief may\n have important interpersonal consequences. We investigated whether American\n Christians expect more trustworthiness from (and are more likely to trust)\n interaction partners who believe in karma. We conducted an incentivized\n study of the trust game where interaction partners had different beliefs in\n karma and God. Participants expected more trustworthiness from (and were\n more likely to trust) karma believers. Expectations did not match actual\n behavior: karmic belief was not associated with actual trustworthiness.\n These findings suggest that people may use others’ karmic belief as a cue to\n predict their trustworthiness but would err when doing so.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Believers of karma believe in ethical causation where good and bad outcomes can be traced to past moral and immoral acts. Karmic belief may have important interpersonal consequences. We investigated whether American Christians expect more trustworthiness from (and are more likely to trust) interaction partners who believe in karma. We conducted an incentivized study of the trust game where interaction partners had different beliefs in karma and God. Participants expected more trustworthiness from (and were more likely to trust) karma believers. Expectations did not match actual behavior: karmic belief was not associated with actual trustworthiness. These findings suggest that people may use others’ karmic belief as a cue to predict their trustworthiness but would err when doing so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对因果报应的信仰与感知的(但不是实际的)可信度有关
因果报应的信徒相信道德因果关系,好的和坏的结果可以追溯到过去的道德和不道德的行为。业力信仰可能对人际关系产生重要影响。我们调查了美国基督徒是否期望从相信因果报应的互动伙伴那里获得更多的信任(并且更有可能信任)。我们对信任游戏进行了一项激励研究,其中互动伙伴对因果报应和上帝有不同的信仰。参与者期望从业力信徒那里得到更多的信任(也更有可能相信)。期望与实际行为不符:业力信仰与实际可信度无关。这些发现表明,人们可能会用他人的业力信仰作为预测他人可信度的线索,但这样做会出错。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The benefits of deciding now and not later: The influence of the timing between acquiring knowledge and deciding on decision confidence, omission neglect bias, and choice deferral I want to believe: Prior beliefs influence judgments about the effectiveness of both alternative and scientific medicine The final step effect Choosing more aggressive commitment contracts for others than for the self Systematic metacognitive reflection helps people discover far-sighted decision strategies: A process-tracing experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1