Durkheim on ‘Primitive’ Religion: A Reappraisal

Z. Kotzé
{"title":"Durkheim on ‘Primitive’ Religion: A Reappraisal","authors":"Z. Kotzé","doi":"10.31577/SOCIOLOGIA.2021.53.3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Durkheim on ‘Primitive’ Religion: A Reappraisal. Durkheim is widely regarded as one of the most prominent scholars of the sociology of religion. While many scholars of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries have been criticised for racist bias in support of imperial projects by decolonial and postcolonial thinkers in recent years, Durkheim is often celebrated for his rejection of the questionable evolutionist ideas of his time. This paper reconsiders Durkheim’s theory of so-called ‘primitive’ religion in relation to other preeminent theories of religion of his era, such as Edward Burnett Tylor’s theory of religion as animism. Utilising a postcolonial approach, the paper firstly critically examines the use of concepts such as ‘primitive’ in Tylor and Durkheim’s anthropological and sociological theories of religion, respectively. It is demonstrated that, although Durkheim was overtly critical of evolutionist approaches of his day and attempted to break from this dominant paradigm by focusing more on social structures, rather than temporal development, he failed in freeing himself from prevalent racist assumptions. Despite this failing and the fact that his theorising of religion as totemism has long since fallen out of favour, however, his focus on the social nature and function of religion should still be celebrated. Sociológia 2021, Vol. 53 (No. 3: 225-237) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2021.53.3.8","PeriodicalId":35251,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/SOCIOLOGIA.2021.53.3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Durkheim on ‘Primitive’ Religion: A Reappraisal. Durkheim is widely regarded as one of the most prominent scholars of the sociology of religion. While many scholars of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries have been criticised for racist bias in support of imperial projects by decolonial and postcolonial thinkers in recent years, Durkheim is often celebrated for his rejection of the questionable evolutionist ideas of his time. This paper reconsiders Durkheim’s theory of so-called ‘primitive’ religion in relation to other preeminent theories of religion of his era, such as Edward Burnett Tylor’s theory of religion as animism. Utilising a postcolonial approach, the paper firstly critically examines the use of concepts such as ‘primitive’ in Tylor and Durkheim’s anthropological and sociological theories of religion, respectively. It is demonstrated that, although Durkheim was overtly critical of evolutionist approaches of his day and attempted to break from this dominant paradigm by focusing more on social structures, rather than temporal development, he failed in freeing himself from prevalent racist assumptions. Despite this failing and the fact that his theorising of religion as totemism has long since fallen out of favour, however, his focus on the social nature and function of religion should still be celebrated. Sociológia 2021, Vol. 53 (No. 3: 225-237) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2021.53.3.8
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
涂尔干对“原始”宗教的再评价
涂尔干论“原始”宗教:再评价。迪尔凯姆被广泛认为是最杰出的宗教社会学学者之一。近年来,许多19世纪末和20世纪初的学者因支持非殖民和后殖民思想家的帝国主义计划而受到种族主义偏见的批评,而迪尔凯姆则因拒绝他那个时代有问题的进化论思想而受到称赞。本文将迪尔凯姆所谓的“原始”宗教理论与他那个时代其他杰出的宗教理论(如爱德华·伯内特·泰勒的万物有灵论)进行重新思考。利用后殖民方法,本文首先批判性地考察了泰勒和迪尔凯姆的宗教人类学和社会学理论中“原始”等概念的使用。这表明,尽管迪尔凯姆公开批评他那个时代的进化论方法,并试图通过更多地关注社会结构而不是时间发展来打破这种主导范式,但他未能将自己从流行的种族主义假设中解放出来。尽管失败了,而且他将宗教作为图腾的理论早已失宠,然而,他对宗教的社会性质和功能的关注仍然值得庆祝。Sociológia 2021, Vol. 53 (No. 3: 225-237) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2021.53.3.8
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Against Accumulation: Class Traitors Challenge Wealth and Worth Excess Profits, Taxpayer-Subsidized Philanthropy, and the Coronavirus Crisis: Charitable Giving of the Tech Elite in Response to the Pandemic Lucy Suchman in Conversation with Ana Gross Gender and wealth in the super rich: asset differences in top wealth households in the United States, 1989–2019 Risk Mismatches and Inequalities: Oil and Gas and Elite Risk-Classes in the U.S. and Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1