Comparison of Chemical Characteristics of Various Commercial Animal Skin Crackers

Q3 Veterinary American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.3844/ajavsp.2022.314.321

S. Susanti, A. Hintono, S. Mulyani, Fadia Aini Ardi, F. Arifan

{"title":"Comparison of Chemical Characteristics of Various Commercial Animal Skin Crackers","authors":"S. Susanti, A. Hintono, S. Mulyani, Fadia Aini Ardi, F. Arifan","doi":"10.3844/ajavsp.2022.314.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study aims to compare the data on chemical characteristics (protein content, fat, ash, moisture, Free Fatty Acid (FFA), Thiobarbituric Acid (TBA), and total energy) of commercial skin crackers made from various kinds of animal skin. Four categories of commercial animal skin crackers from the same producer were assigned as treatments, including cowhide crackers, buffalo askin crackers, fish skin crackers, and chicken skin crackers. The data showed that the type of animal skin as the raw material for crackers had a significant effect on the levels of protein, fat, ash, free fatty acid value, and total energy of the final product. However, the type of animal skin did not significantly affect of moisture content of the product. The highest protein content was shown in cowhide crackers and buffalo skin crackers, where cowhide crackers also showed the lowest fat content and free fatty acid value but high ash content (p<0.05). Descriptively, the thiobarbituric acid value of cowhide crackers is also low. Meanwhile, the highest total energy was owned by chicken skin crackers (p<0.05). Thus, among commercial animal skin crackers products, cowhide crackers have the best chemical characteristics because they contain higher protein and ash with a lower fat content, free fatty acid value, thiobarbituric acid value, and total energy so they can be recommended as a quality.","PeriodicalId":7561,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2022.314.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

: This study aims to compare the data on chemical characteristics (protein content, fat, ash, moisture, Free Fatty Acid (FFA), Thiobarbituric Acid (TBA), and total energy) of commercial skin crackers made from various kinds of animal skin. Four categories of commercial animal skin crackers from the same producer were assigned as treatments, including cowhide crackers, buffalo askin crackers, fish skin crackers, and chicken skin crackers. The data showed that the type of animal skin as the raw material for crackers had a significant effect on the levels of protein, fat, ash, free fatty acid value, and total energy of the final product. However, the type of animal skin did not significantly affect of moisture content of the product. The highest protein content was shown in cowhide crackers and buffalo skin crackers, where cowhide crackers also showed the lowest fat content and free fatty acid value but high ash content (p<0.05). Descriptively, the thiobarbituric acid value of cowhide crackers is also low. Meanwhile, the highest total energy was owned by chicken skin crackers (p<0.05). Thus, among commercial animal skin crackers products, cowhide crackers have the best chemical characteristics because they contain higher protein and ash with a lower fat content, free fatty acid value, thiobarbituric acid value, and total energy so they can be recommended as a quality.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

各种商品动物皮饼干化学特性的比较

本研究的目的是比较不同种类动物皮制成的商品皮脆的化学特性数据(蛋白质含量、脂肪、灰分、水分、游离脂肪酸(FFA)、硫代巴比妥酸(TBA)和总能量)。来自同一生产商的四类商业动物皮饼干被分配作为处理，包括牛皮饼干、水牛皮饼干、鱼皮饼干和鸡皮饼干。结果表明，动物皮的种类对裂解物的蛋白质、脂肪、灰分、游离脂肪酸值和总能量有显著影响。然而，动物皮肤的类型对产品的水分含量没有显著影响。牛皮裂解物的蛋白质含量最高，牛皮裂解物的脂肪含量和游离脂肪酸值最低，但灰分含量较高(p<0.05)。说明牛皮裂解物的硫代巴比妥酸值也较低。总能量最高的是鸡皮脆饼(p<0.05)。因此，在商品动物皮裂解产品中，牛皮裂解具有最好的化学特性，因为牛皮裂解含有较高的蛋白质和灰分，而脂肪含量、游离脂肪酸值、硫代巴比托酸值和总能量较低，可以作为一种质量推荐。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Veterinary-Veterinary (all)

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, a quarterly, peer reviewed publication and is dedicated for publication of research articles in the field of biology of animals and with the scientific understanding of how animals work: from the physiology and biochemistry of tissues and major organ systems down to the structure and function of bio molecules and cells; particular emphasis would given to the studies of growth, reproduction, nutrition and lactation of farm and companion animals and how these processes may be optimized to improve animal re- productivity, health and welfare. Articles in support areas, such as genetics, soils, agricultural economics and marketing, legal aspects and the environment also are encouraged. AJAVS is an important source of researcher to study articles on protection of animal production practices, herd health and monitoring the spread of disease and prevention in both domestic and wild animals.