"Heroin Mothers," "Methadone Babies," and the Medical Controversy over Methadone Maintenance in the Early 1970s.

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Bulletin of the History of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/bhm.2023.0009
Ulrich Koch
{"title":"\"Heroin Mothers,\" \"Methadone Babies,\" and the Medical Controversy over Methadone Maintenance in the Early 1970s.","authors":"Ulrich Koch","doi":"10.1353/bhm.2023.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article situates the emergence of sensationalized news reports of \"infant addicts\" and the concurrently evolving study of neonatal drug withdrawal within the context of the expansion of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in the United States. It details how, in the early 1970s, concerns about pregnant narcotic addicts and their infants became part of the politically charged debate over methadone maintenance. The popular press amplified the apprehensions of a vocal group of pediatricians who saw in infants' withdrawal an indication of methadone's inherent harmfulness and potential toxicity. Increased access to MMT and its presumed normalizing effects on reproductive functions augmented these concerns. The ensuing controversy led clinical researchers to define, measure, and systematically study \"neonatal abstinence syndrome,\" whereas the emerging media trope of the infant drug addict effectively undermined the claims made by MMT's proponents about the drug's therapeutic utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":55304,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","volume":"97 1","pages":"127-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2023.0009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article situates the emergence of sensationalized news reports of "infant addicts" and the concurrently evolving study of neonatal drug withdrawal within the context of the expansion of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in the United States. It details how, in the early 1970s, concerns about pregnant narcotic addicts and their infants became part of the politically charged debate over methadone maintenance. The popular press amplified the apprehensions of a vocal group of pediatricians who saw in infants' withdrawal an indication of methadone's inherent harmfulness and potential toxicity. Increased access to MMT and its presumed normalizing effects on reproductive functions augmented these concerns. The ensuing controversy led clinical researchers to define, measure, and systematically study "neonatal abstinence syndrome," whereas the emerging media trope of the infant drug addict effectively undermined the claims made by MMT's proponents about the drug's therapeutic utility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪70年代初的“海洛因母亲”、“美沙酮婴儿”和美沙酮维持医学争论
摘要:本文在美国美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)扩大的背景下,对“婴儿成瘾”的耸人听闻的新闻报道的出现和新生儿药物戒断研究的同时发展进行了分析。它详细描述了在20世纪70年代早期,对怀孕的麻醉品成瘾者及其婴儿的担忧如何成为美沙酮维持问题上充满政治色彩的辩论的一部分。大众媒体放大了一群儿科医生的担忧,他们认为婴儿的戒断反应表明美沙酮具有内在的危害性和潜在的毒性。MMT的普及及其对生殖功能的正常化影响加剧了这些担忧。随之而来的争议导致临床研究人员对“新生儿戒断综合征”进行定义、测量和系统研究,而新兴媒体对婴儿吸毒成瘾的比喻有效地破坏了MMT支持者关于药物治疗效用的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the History of Medicine
Bulletin of the History of Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field for more than three quarters of a century, the Bulletin spans the social, cultural, and scientific aspects of the history of medicine worldwide. Every issue includes reviews of recent books on medical history. Recurring sections include Digital Humanities & Public History and Pedagogy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine is the official publication of the American Association for the History of Medicine (AAHM) and the Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine.
期刊最新文献
An Artificial Appetite: The Nineteenth-Century Struggle to Define Habitual Drunkenness Segregated in Life and Death: Arnold R. Rich and the Racial Science of Tuberculosis A Tribute to Caroline Catherine Hannaway (1943–2024) The Citizen as a Public Health Actor: Complaints as Public Engagement with Aedes Mosquito Control in Singapore, 1965–1985 A Clinic for the People: Toward an Antiracist Psychiatry at the Tuskegee Institute 1947–1965
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1