Whose authority may I ask? Polish, English, German, Shakespearean or directorial? On the boundaries between ethnicity, nationality, religion and theatricality in Jan Klata’s Shakespearean productions

J. Fabiszak
{"title":"Whose authority may I ask? Polish, English, German, Shakespearean or directorial? On the boundaries between ethnicity, nationality, religion and theatricality in Jan Klata’s Shakespearean productions","authors":"J. Fabiszak","doi":"10.18778/2083-8530.17.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Jan Klata is a director who has been labelled a provocateur and who is considered to hold nothing cultural or national sacred. From the beginning of his artistic career he is said to have challenged authorities: theatrical, ethnic, national, etc. by debunking and questioning prevailing heroic myths and forms. Today, imperceptibly yet steadily, Klata himself becomes an authority and his theatrical productions gradually become classics in the eyes of the new generations of theatre directors and audiences, at the same time inciting and inevitably inviting cultural rebellion ... The article examines Klata’s treatment of theatrical and national authority in his Shakespeare productions, on the one hand, and the image of the director as an authority on the other. All in the light of the theoretical model on authority in theatre, especially in Shakespeare productions, developed by W.B. Worthen.","PeriodicalId":40600,"journal":{"name":"Multicultural Shakespeare-Translation Appropriation and Performance","volume":"17 1","pages":"51 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multicultural Shakespeare-Translation Appropriation and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.17.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Jan Klata is a director who has been labelled a provocateur and who is considered to hold nothing cultural or national sacred. From the beginning of his artistic career he is said to have challenged authorities: theatrical, ethnic, national, etc. by debunking and questioning prevailing heroic myths and forms. Today, imperceptibly yet steadily, Klata himself becomes an authority and his theatrical productions gradually become classics in the eyes of the new generations of theatre directors and audiences, at the same time inciting and inevitably inviting cultural rebellion ... The article examines Klata’s treatment of theatrical and national authority in his Shakespeare productions, on the one hand, and the image of the director as an authority on the other. All in the light of the theoretical model on authority in theatre, especially in Shakespeare productions, developed by W.B. Worthen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我可以问谁的权限?波兰语、英语、德语、莎士比亚语还是导演语?论扬·克拉塔莎士比亚作品中的种族、民族、宗教与戏剧性的界限
摘要Jan Klata是一位被贴上挑衅标签的导演,他被认为没有任何文化或国家神圣性。据说,从他艺术生涯的一开始,他就通过揭穿和质疑流行的英雄神话和形式来挑战权威:戏剧、种族、民族等。如今,在不知不觉中,克拉塔本人逐渐成为权威,他的戏剧作品逐渐成为新一代戏剧导演和观众眼中的经典,同时煽动并不可避免地引发文化叛乱。。。本文一方面考察了克拉塔在莎士比亚作品中对戏剧和国家权威的处理,另一方面也考察了导演作为权威的形象。这一切都是根据W·B·沃森提出的关于戏剧权威的理论模型,尤其是在莎士比亚作品中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transformative Potential and Utopian Performative: Postdramatic Hamlet in Turkey “To Make Dark Heaven Light:” Transcending the Tragic in Sintang Dalisay An Interview with Stratis Panourios Utopia, Arcadia and the Forest of Arden From Race and Orientalism in A Midsummer Night’s Dream to Caste and Indigenous Otherness on the Indian Screen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1