Non-governmental organizations coalition in influencing global agenda

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik Pub Date : 2022-10-04 DOI:10.20473/mkp.v35i42022.422-432
Anthony Eniayejuni, Shona Olalere, Eugene Obiora Eugene
{"title":"Non-governmental organizations coalition in influencing global agenda","authors":"Anthony Eniayejuni, Shona Olalere, Eugene Obiora Eugene","doi":"10.20473/mkp.v35i42022.422-432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to show how a coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can influence the human rights agenda. This study relies on the advocacy coalition Framework (ACF) assumption that multiple varieties of actors involved in the policy process may combine to form coalitions. This study examines how Amnesty International (AI), Human Rights Watch (HRW), and the International Crisis Group (ICG) formed a coalition to advocate for measures to address humanitarian crises in Sri Lanka and Darfur. This study employed qualitative research methods and relied on secondary sources related to the topic. The findings show that a coalition formed by human rights organizations can influence policies adopted by the international community and can also influence actions taken by national communities. This study concludes that just as states need to form a coalition with other states or work as “allies” to promote human rights on a national and global level, NGOs also function in a similar manner.","PeriodicalId":55930,"journal":{"name":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v35i42022.422-432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to show how a coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can influence the human rights agenda. This study relies on the advocacy coalition Framework (ACF) assumption that multiple varieties of actors involved in the policy process may combine to form coalitions. This study examines how Amnesty International (AI), Human Rights Watch (HRW), and the International Crisis Group (ICG) formed a coalition to advocate for measures to address humanitarian crises in Sri Lanka and Darfur. This study employed qualitative research methods and relied on secondary sources related to the topic. The findings show that a coalition formed by human rights organizations can influence policies adopted by the international community and can also influence actions taken by national communities. This study concludes that just as states need to form a coalition with other states or work as “allies” to promote human rights on a national and global level, NGOs also function in a similar manner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响全球议程的非政府组织联盟
本研究旨在展示非政府组织联盟如何影响人权议程。这项研究依赖于倡导联盟框架(ACF)的假设,即参与政策过程的多种行为者可能会联合起来形成联盟。这项研究考察了大赦国际、人权观察和国际危机组织如何组成联盟,倡导采取措施解决斯里兰卡和达尔富尔的人道主义危机。本研究采用了定性研究方法,并依赖于与该主题相关的次要来源。研究结果表明,人权组织组成的联盟可以影响国际社会采取的政策,也可以影响国家社区采取的行动。这项研究得出的结论是,正如各国需要与其他国家结成联盟或作为“盟友”在国家和全球层面促进人权一样,非政府组织也以类似的方式发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integrated handling to overcome stunting in rural areas in East Java, Indonesia Agrarian conflict and split recognition: The middle way for recognition of the Mapur Bangka Tribe in Indonesia The dichotomy of electoral choice in fragmented societies: Prospects of 2023 Nigerian general elections The paradox of special autonomy: Why does wealth make Papua poor? Political confrontations and disagreements in the Nigerian Government’s COVID-19 response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1