Randomized Controlled Trial of Acupressure for Perception of Stress and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Health Care Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Self-Acupressure for Stress (SAS) Trial

Ryan Abbott , Edward Kwok-Ho Hui , Lan Kao , Vincent Tse , Tristan Grogan , Betty L. Chang , Ka-Kit Hui
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of Acupressure for Perception of Stress and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Health Care Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Self-Acupressure for Stress (SAS) Trial","authors":"Ryan Abbott ,&nbsp;Edward Kwok-Ho Hui ,&nbsp;Lan Kao ,&nbsp;Vincent Tse ,&nbsp;Tristan Grogan ,&nbsp;Betty L. Chang ,&nbsp;Ka-Kit Hui","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The efficacy of providing self-acupressure educational materials in reducing stress and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is uncertain. Evidence-based data to recommend for or against self-acupressure as an intervention for reducing stress and improving HRQOL is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Self-Acupressure for Stress (SAS) trial evaluates whether providing self-acupressure educational materials would reduce stress and improve HRQOL among health care providers (HCPs).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized behavioral clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>The entire study took place remotely.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>One hundred fifty-nine adult HCPs with no prior experience or training in acupressure.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The intervention group received self-acupressure educational materials.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>Primary outcomes were perception of stress measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), as well as scores on the physical and mental components of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From the baseline to midpoint evaluations, the intervention group significantly reduced their PSS score (<em>P</em> ≤ .001) and increased their SF-12v2 Mental score (<em>P</em> = .002) but not their SF-12v2 Physical score (<em>P</em> = .55). These findings persisted at the final follow-up (both PSS and SF-12v2 Mental changes from baseline <em>P</em> &lt; .001). However, the control group also significantly improved their SF-12v2 Mental from baseline to midpoint (<em>P</em> = .01) which was maintained at final follow-up (<em>P</em> = .02), whereas PSS and SF-12v2 Physical did not significantly change from baseline at either mid or final. Finally, the intervention group improved by significantly more than the control group from baseline to final follow-up for both PSS (<em>P</em> = .007) and SF-12v2 Mental (<em>P</em> = .02) HRQOL measures.</p></div><div><h3>Limitation</h3><p>The trial was not blinded.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among HCPs during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the provision of self-acupressure educational materials safely improved self-reported assessments of perception of stress and mental health. Self-acupressure represents a promising intervention for other populations. The study findings support the use of self-acupressure to reduce stress and improve HRQOL.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04472559.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036423000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of providing self-acupressure educational materials in reducing stress and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is uncertain. Evidence-based data to recommend for or against self-acupressure as an intervention for reducing stress and improving HRQOL is needed.

Objective

The Self-Acupressure for Stress (SAS) trial evaluates whether providing self-acupressure educational materials would reduce stress and improve HRQOL among health care providers (HCPs).

Design

Randomized behavioral clinical trial.

Setting

The entire study took place remotely.

Participants

One hundred fifty-nine adult HCPs with no prior experience or training in acupressure.

Intervention

The intervention group received self-acupressure educational materials.

Measurements

Primary outcomes were perception of stress measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), as well as scores on the physical and mental components of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2).

Results

From the baseline to midpoint evaluations, the intervention group significantly reduced their PSS score (P ≤ .001) and increased their SF-12v2 Mental score (P = .002) but not their SF-12v2 Physical score (P = .55). These findings persisted at the final follow-up (both PSS and SF-12v2 Mental changes from baseline P < .001). However, the control group also significantly improved their SF-12v2 Mental from baseline to midpoint (P = .01) which was maintained at final follow-up (P = .02), whereas PSS and SF-12v2 Physical did not significantly change from baseline at either mid or final. Finally, the intervention group improved by significantly more than the control group from baseline to final follow-up for both PSS (P = .007) and SF-12v2 Mental (P = .02) HRQOL measures.

Limitation

The trial was not blinded.

Conclusion

Among HCPs during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the provision of self-acupressure educational materials safely improved self-reported assessments of perception of stress and mental health. Self-acupressure represents a promising intervention for other populations. The study findings support the use of self-acupressure to reduce stress and improve HRQOL.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04472559.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穴位按压对COVID-19大流行期间卫生保健提供者压力感知和健康相关生活质量的随机对照试验:自我穴位按压压力(SAS)试验
背景:提供自我指压教育材料在减轻压力和改善健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)方面的效果尚不确定。需要循证数据来推荐或反对自我穴位按压作为减轻压力和改善HRQOL的干预措施。目的通过自我穴位按压减压(SAS)试验,评价提供自我穴位按压教材是否能减轻医护人员(HCPs)的压力并改善其HRQOL。设计随机行为临床试验。整个研究都是远程进行的。参与者:159名成人HCPs,没有穴位按压的经验或训练。干预组接受自我指压教育材料。主要结果是通过感知压力量表(PSS)测量的压力感知,以及12项简短健康调查第2版(SF-12v2)的生理和心理部分得分。结果从基线到中点,干预组患者PSS评分显著降低(P≤0.001),SF-12v2心理评分显著升高(P = 0.002), SF-12v2生理评分无显著升高(P = 0.55)。这些发现在最后的随访中持续存在(PSS和SF-12v2从基线P和lt的心理变化;措施)。然而,对照组的SF-12v2 Mental从基线到中点也有显著改善(P = 0.01),并在最终随访时保持(P = 0.02),而PSS和SF-12v2 Physical在中期和最终随访时均无显著变化。最后,干预组的PSS (P = .007)和SF-12v2 Mental (P = .02) HRQOL指标从基线到最终随访的改善均显著高于对照组。局限性:该试验不是盲法试验。结论在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,提供安全的自我指压教育材料可改善自我报告的压力感知和心理健康评估。自我穴位按压对其他人群来说是一种很有希望的干预方法。研究结果支持使用自我指压来减轻压力和改善HRQOL。临床试验注册网站:NCT04472559。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Functional Assessment of >18 Years Old Patients at Internal Medicine Ward—Relationship with In-Hospital and 30-Day Mortality Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey Post-Acute Sequelae of Covid-19: A System-wise Approach on the Effects of Long-Covid-19 In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Ethnicity Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Among Emerging Adult Cannabis Users by Race/Ethnicity: Analysis of the 2009-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1