Pub Date : 2025-12-14DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100123
Rachel Corren , Sylvia La , Edgar Corona , Dalia Martinez , Urmimala Sarkar , Blake Gregory , Uri Ladabaum , Ma Somsouk
Aims
Organized screening programs improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation, but outreach services can be improved. We sought to understand screening deferral by examining patient-level factors and how they relate to fecal immunochemical test (FIT) orders, completion rates, and long-term mortality.
Methods
Patients aged 50-75 years who were not up to date with CRC screening receiving usual care were followed over time (NCT02613260). Patient-level laboratory and cancer registry data were used to identify patients who met a specified laboratory threshold: albumin < 3 g/dL, HIV viral load > 10,000 copies or CD4 < 200 cells/µL, creatinine > 4 mg/dL, platelets < 100,000/µL, total bilirubin > 4 µmol/L, NH3 > 20, positive urine amphetamine or cocaine, serum ethanol > 80, hemoglobin A1C > 10%, and stage 3 or 4 cancer. The proportion of patients with a FIT order, FIT completion in 1-year, and mortality at 8-years were compared in patents with and without the lab abnormality.
Results
Nine thousand six hundred seventy-six patients were eligible for screening, of which 1053 met the criteria for laboratory abnormalities. Patients with laboratory abnormalities were less likely to have a FIT order placed (39.5% vs 66.8%, P < .001) and were less likely to complete FIT screening (21.5% vs 51.6%, P < .001). Moreover, patients with laboratory abnormalities experienced higher mortality at 8-year follow-up (32.6% vs 6.7%, P < .001).
Conclusions
Patients with laboratory abnormalities were less likely to have a FIT order placed and completed, and experienced higher mortality, suggesting that screening was deferred by providers. Future studies should gather provider input to understand how patient-level electronic data could be considered in the implementation of screening services.
目的:有组织的筛查项目提高了结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的参与率,但外展服务可以得到改善。我们试图通过检查患者层面的因素以及它们与粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)顺序、完成率和长期死亡率的关系来了解筛查延迟。方法对50-75岁未接受常规治疗的结直肠癌筛查患者进行长期随访(NCT02613260)。使用患者水平的实验室和癌症登记数据来识别符合特定实验室阈值的患者:白蛋白3 g/dL, HIV病毒载量1万拷贝或CD4 200 cells/µL,肌酐4 mg/dL,血小板10万/µL,总胆红素4µmol/L, NH3 20,尿安非他明或可卡因阳性,血清乙醇80,血红蛋白A1C 10%,癌症3期或4期。比较有和没有实验室异常的患者的FIT订单、1年内FIT完成和8年死亡率的比例。结果96076例患者符合筛查条件,其中1053例符合实验室异常标准。有实验室异常的患者不太可能有FIT订单(39.5%对66.8%,P < 001),也不太可能完成FIT筛查(21.5%对51.6%,P < 001)。此外,在8年随访中,实验室异常患者的死亡率更高(32.6% vs 6.7%, P < .001)。结论有实验室异常的患者更不可能有FIT订单,并且经历了更高的死亡率,提示筛查被提供者推迟了。未来的研究应该收集提供者的意见,以了解在实施筛查服务时如何考虑患者层面的电子数据。
{"title":"Influence of Comorbidities on Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation and Mortality","authors":"Rachel Corren , Sylvia La , Edgar Corona , Dalia Martinez , Urmimala Sarkar , Blake Gregory , Uri Ladabaum , Ma Somsouk","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100123","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100123","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Organized screening programs improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation, but outreach services can be improved. We sought to understand screening deferral by examining patient-level factors and how they relate to fecal immunochemical test (FIT) orders, completion rates, and long-term mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients aged 50-75 years who were not up to date with CRC screening receiving usual care were followed over time (NCT02613260). Patient-level laboratory and cancer registry data were used to identify patients who met a specified laboratory threshold: albumin < 3 g/dL, HIV viral load > 10,000 copies or CD4 < 200 cells/µL, creatinine > 4 mg/dL, platelets < 100,000/µL, total bilirubin > 4 µmol/L, NH3 > 20, positive urine amphetamine or cocaine, serum ethanol > 80, hemoglobin A1C > 10%, and stage 3 or 4 cancer. The proportion of patients with a FIT order, FIT completion in 1-year, and mortality at 8-years were compared in patents with and without the lab abnormality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine thousand six hundred seventy-six patients were eligible for screening, of which 1053 met the criteria for laboratory abnormalities. Patients with laboratory abnormalities were less likely to have a FIT order placed (39.5% vs 66.8%, <em>P</em> < .001) and were less likely to complete FIT screening (21.5% vs 51.6%, <em>P</em> < .001). Moreover, patients with laboratory abnormalities experienced higher mortality at 8-year follow-up (32.6% vs 6.7%, <em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with laboratory abnormalities were less likely to have a FIT order placed and completed, and experienced higher mortality, suggesting that screening was deferred by providers. Future studies should gather provider input to understand how patient-level electronic data could be considered in the implementation of screening services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100122
Carla King MPH , Michael S. Shen MD , Jaycee Bayani RN , Daniel Schatz MD
Background
Effective management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome during hospitalization is paramount to patient safety and quality care. NYC Health + Hospitals initiated a quality improvement project to pilot an electronic health record (EHR) integrated, nurse-driven CIWA-Ar symptom-triggered protocol, including recommendations for medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUD), in medical and surgical units at 3 public hospitals.
Objective
To describe implementation processes and to report related implementation outcomes (appropriateness, feasibility, and adoption) of the updated CIWA-Ar protocol in a safety net hospital setting.
Methods
NYC Health + Hospitals implemented a standardized CIWA-Ar symptom-triggered, nurse-driven EHR protocol on March 15, 2022. The protocol included order sets, practice advisories, task lists, and reminders for assessments and orders. We measured nursing perspectives on feasibility and appropriateness at 6 months via a survey. We measured provider adoption as the proportion of admissions with a CIWA-Ar protocol ordered among admissions that triggered a recommendation, and MAUD use as the proportion of admissions with a MAUD order during hospitalization among all patients with a protocol ordered.
Results
During 13 months of implementation, providers ordered a CIWA-Ar protocol for 59.1% (n = 887/1500) of recommended admissions. Adoption increased over time from 46.0% in month 1 to 63.2%-78.9% in months 11 to 13 (P = .0004). Most nurses agreed that the protocol was suitable, fitting for medicine, easy to use, and improved clinical care for patients experiencing alcohol withdrawal syndrome. MAUD was ordered in 19.2% of admissions, however, did not change over the course of implementation (P = .249).
Conclusions
The CIWA-Ar protocol was appropriate, feasible, and adopted at NYC public hospitals. Quality improvements to ensure protocol fidelity with benzodiazepine dosing and MAUD prescribing are needed.
{"title":"Appropriateness, feasibility, and adoption of a nurse-driven CIWA-Ar symptom-triggered protocol for alcohol withdrawal syndrome in New York City public hospitals","authors":"Carla King MPH , Michael S. Shen MD , Jaycee Bayani RN , Daniel Schatz MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100122","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100122","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Effective management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome during hospitalization is paramount to patient safety and quality care. NYC Health + Hospitals initiated a quality improvement project to pilot an electronic health record (EHR) integrated, nurse-driven CIWA-Ar symptom-triggered protocol, including recommendations for medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUD), in medical and surgical units at 3 public hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe implementation processes and to report related implementation outcomes (appropriateness, feasibility, and adoption) of the updated CIWA-Ar protocol in a safety net hospital setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>NYC Health + Hospitals implemented a standardized CIWA-Ar symptom-triggered, nurse-driven EHR protocol on March 15, 2022. The protocol included order sets, practice advisories, task lists, and reminders for assessments and orders. We measured nursing perspectives on feasibility and appropriateness at 6 months via a survey. We measured provider adoption as the proportion of admissions with a CIWA-Ar protocol ordered among admissions that triggered a recommendation, and MAUD use as the proportion of admissions with a MAUD order during hospitalization among all patients with a protocol ordered.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During 13 months of implementation, providers ordered a CIWA-Ar protocol for 59.1% (n = 887/1500) of recommended admissions. Adoption increased over time from 46.0% in month 1 to 63.2%-78.9% in months 11 to 13 (<em>P</em> = .0004). Most nurses agreed that the protocol was suitable, fitting for medicine, easy to use, and improved clinical care for patients experiencing alcohol withdrawal syndrome. MAUD was ordered in 19.2% of admissions, however, did not change over the course of implementation (<em>P</em> = .249).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CIWA-Ar protocol was appropriate, feasible, and adopted at NYC public hospitals. Quality improvements to ensure protocol fidelity with benzodiazepine dosing and MAUD prescribing are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-10DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100120
Cerina Dubois PhD , Dean T. Eurich PhD , Jason R.B. Dyck PhD , Elaine Hyshka PhD , John G. Hanlon MD , Arsene Zongo PhD
Objective
This study examined the association between the authorized prescription of cannabis and heart failure (HF) events.
Study design
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received an authorized prescription of cannabis in Ontario cannabis clinics between 2014-2019 and controls selected from the general population of Ontario.
Methods
Ontario’s health administrative data and clinical data from the cannabis clinics were used. Inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity scores were used to minimize confounding between cannabis exposure and the study outcomes. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regressions measured the association between exposure to cannabis and ED/hospitalization for HF (primary outcome), and a secondary outcome that extended the primary outcome by including physician claims for HF.
Results
Among 54,006 patients exposed to cannabis and 161,265 controls, 39% were aged ≤ 50 years, and 55% were female. For the primary outcome, incidence rates for ED visits/hospitalization due to HF were 5.87/1000 person-years (95%CI: 5.72-6.03) in the cannabis group and 5.14/1000 person-years (5.05-5.22) in the control group.
Patients exposed to cannabis had a higher risk for the primary outcome with a hazard ratio of 1.15 (95%CI: 1.06-1.25). For the secondary outcome, incidence rates were 18.99 (95% CI: 18.55-19.44) in the cannabis group and 16.69 (95% CI: 16.46-16.93) for controls; with a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19).
Conclusions
The results suggest a higher risk of heart failure-related events, including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and outpatient consultations, among patients who were authorized cannabis for medical purposes.
{"title":"Risk of Heart Failure-related Events in Patients Exposed to Medical Cannabis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study","authors":"Cerina Dubois PhD , Dean T. Eurich PhD , Jason R.B. Dyck PhD , Elaine Hyshka PhD , John G. Hanlon MD , Arsene Zongo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100120","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100120","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined the association between the authorized prescription of cannabis and heart failure (HF) events.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received an authorized prescription of cannabis in Ontario cannabis clinics between 2014-2019 and controls selected from the general population of Ontario.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ontario’s health administrative data and clinical data from the cannabis clinics were used. Inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity scores were used to minimize confounding between cannabis exposure and the study outcomes. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regressions measured the association between exposure to cannabis and ED/hospitalization for HF (primary outcome), and a secondary outcome that extended the primary outcome by including physician claims for HF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 54,006 patients exposed to cannabis and 161,265 controls, 39% were aged ≤ 50 years, and 55% were female. For the primary outcome, incidence rates for ED visits/hospitalization due to HF were 5.87/1000 person-years (95%CI: 5.72-6.03) in the cannabis group and 5.14/1000 person-years (5.05-5.22) in the control group.</div><div>Patients exposed to cannabis had a higher risk for the primary outcome with a hazard ratio of 1.15 (95%CI: 1.06-1.25). For the secondary outcome, incidence rates were 18.99 (95% CI: 18.55-19.44) in the cannabis group and 16.69 (95% CI: 16.46-16.93) for controls; with a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results suggest a higher risk of heart failure-related events, including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and outpatient consultations, among patients who were authorized cannabis for medical purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-27DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100119
Katie M. Rieck , Darrell R. Schroeder , Michael A. Mao
Objective
To assess the risk of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury after nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration in the general medical population.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) that included all general care medical patients for 2 years. Patients were analyzed in a propensity-adjusted approach using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) according to NSAID exposure on hospital day 0 or 1 categorized as follows: (1) no NSAID exposure; (2) only low-dose aspirin; (3) topical exposures, or (4) systemic NSAIDs.
Results
A total of 17,885 patients met the initial inclusion criteria, and 11,840 were included in the study. The systemic NSAID cohort were the healthiest and youngest patients at baseline with fewer comorbidities. After adjustment, there was no significant difference seen in the rate of AKI (using the inverse probability of treatment weighting) between cohorts. The odds ratio of hospital-acquired AKI was 1.16 (0.80-1.70) in the Low-dose Aspirin group, 0.65 (0.21-2.03) in the Topical group, and 0.82 (0.27-1.85) in the Systemic NSAID group, with the No NSAID serving as the reference. Adjusted AKI incidence was 3.4% with No NSAIDs, 3.9% with Low-dose Aspirin, 2.2% with Topicals, and 2.8% with Systemic NSAIDs. These differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence that carefully selected hospitalized patients may be able to receive NSAIDs without increasing their AKI risk. This increases options for the treatment of pain, which may improve patient satisfaction and decrease opioid-related complications. Further prospective research is required to verify the findings of our study.
{"title":"Inpatient NSAID Exposure and Development of Acute Kidney Injury in Medical Inpatients: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Katie M. Rieck , Darrell R. Schroeder , Michael A. Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100119","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100119","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the risk of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury after nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration in the general medical population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) that included all general care medical patients for 2 years. Patients were analyzed in a propensity-adjusted approach using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) according to NSAID exposure on hospital day 0 or 1 categorized as follows: (1) no NSAID exposure; (2) only low-dose aspirin; (3) topical exposures, or (4) systemic NSAIDs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 17,885 patients met the initial inclusion criteria, and 11,840 were included in the study. The systemic NSAID cohort were the healthiest and youngest patients at baseline with fewer comorbidities. After adjustment, there was no significant difference seen in the rate of AKI (using the inverse probability of treatment weighting) between cohorts. The odds ratio of hospital-acquired AKI was 1.16 (0.80-1.70) in the Low-dose Aspirin group, 0.65 (0.21-2.03) in the Topical group, and 0.82 (0.27-1.85) in the Systemic NSAID group, with the No NSAID serving as the reference. Adjusted AKI incidence was 3.4% with No NSAIDs, 3.9% with Low-dose Aspirin, 2.2% with Topicals, and 2.8% with Systemic NSAIDs. These differences were not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides evidence that carefully selected hospitalized patients may be able to receive NSAIDs without increasing their AKI risk. This increases options for the treatment of pain, which may improve patient satisfaction and decrease opioid-related complications. Further prospective research is required to verify the findings of our study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145718976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100118
Scott A. Wu , Gayane N. Archer , Brent D. Schnipke
{"title":"High-dose buprenorphine inductions in hospital settings","authors":"Scott A. Wu , Gayane N. Archer , Brent D. Schnipke","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100118","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100118","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145518966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100117
Joan Park MD , Mishka Terplan MD , Jessica Ratner MD
Opioid use disorder is increasingly prevalent among pregnant persons. Hospitalists and general obstetricians are uniquely positioned to treat pregnant persons with OUD, who may not otherwise be engaged in care. Pregnant people with OUD face stigma, discrimination, and fear of losing custody of their children. Providers should offer supportive and nonjudgmental care that is guided by the principles of harm reduction. All pregnant persons should be screened for OUD, diagnosed and treated accordingly. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), methadone and buprenorphine, are safe in pregnancy and are gold standard treatment. Patients should be initiated or continued on MOUD during hospitalization. Pregnancy may increase metabolism of both buprenorphine and methadone, and therefore, dosages may need to be increased or given more frequently. Given the increase of high potency synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, providers should be familiar with low-dose buprenorphine initiation or rapid methadone titration. Providers should monitor for opioid withdrawal and treat aggressively with MOUD and adjuvant medications. This may also require full agonists opioids. OUD treatment and support should continue into the post-partum period, a time of increased vulnerabilities to return to use, OUD recurrence, and overdose. Discharge planning should be family-centered, considering partners, their family, and the newborn. Social work and peer navigators should be engaged to help coordinate long-term outpatient resources including postpartum psychosocial support services such as substance use disorder treatment and relapse prevention programs.
{"title":"Hospital Care for Pregnant Persons With OUD Review","authors":"Joan Park MD , Mishka Terplan MD , Jessica Ratner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100117","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100117","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Opioid use disorder is increasingly prevalent among pregnant persons. Hospitalists and general obstetricians are uniquely positioned to treat pregnant persons with OUD, who may not otherwise be engaged in care. Pregnant people with OUD face stigma, discrimination, and fear of losing custody of their children. Providers should offer supportive and nonjudgmental care that is guided by the principles of harm reduction. All pregnant persons should be screened for OUD, diagnosed and treated accordingly. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), methadone and buprenorphine, are safe in pregnancy and are gold standard treatment. Patients should be initiated or continued on MOUD during hospitalization. Pregnancy may increase metabolism of both buprenorphine and methadone, and therefore, dosages may need to be increased or given more frequently. Given the increase of high potency synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, providers should be familiar with low-dose buprenorphine initiation or rapid methadone titration. Providers should monitor for opioid withdrawal and treat aggressively with MOUD and adjuvant medications. This may also require full agonists opioids. OUD treatment and support should continue into the post-partum period, a time of increased vulnerabilities to return to use, OUD recurrence, and overdose. Discharge planning should be family-centered, considering partners, their family, and the newborn. Social work and peer navigators should be engaged to help coordinate long-term outpatient resources including postpartum psychosocial support services such as substance use disorder treatment and relapse prevention programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145518965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-20DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100114
Omar Faour MD , Moheb Boktor MD , Hanford Yau MD , Mustafa Kinaan MD , Ishak A Mansi MD
Background
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medications are widely used in managing type 2 diabetes because of their cardio-renal-metabolic benefits. However, concerns persist regarding their potential association with acute pancreatitis (AP) and pancreatic cancer. This study’s objective was to examine the association of GLP-1RAs with the risk of AP and pancreatic cancer.
Methods
This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study used Veterans Health Administration national data during fiscal years 2006 to 2021. Using a new-user active comparator design, we included veterans who initiated either GLP-1RA or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) medication, the latter as an active comparator. The primary outcomes were incident AP and pancreatic cancer. We excluded patients with a history of pancreatitis, pancreatic tumors, pancreatic congenital anomalies, and alcohol use. Secondary analysis included adjusting for confounders that may have been introduced during the follow-up period, such as gallbladder diseases, and post hoc analysis restricted analysis to people who had normal serum lipase during follow-up.
Results
We matched 88,972 pairs of GLP-1RA and DPP-4i users on all characteristics. AP was diagnosed in 214 (0.24%) DPP-4i users versus 273 (0.31%) GLP-1RA users (OR 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.53), and pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in 154 (0.17%) DPP-4i users versus 211 (0.24%) GLP-1RA users (OR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.11-1.69). Secondary and post hoc analyses showed results consistent with the primary analysis.
Conclusions
GLP-1RAs are associated with a modest but statistically significant increase in the risk of AP and pancreatic cancer compared to DPP-4i.
Clinical significance
GLP-1RA use is associated with modestly increased odds ratio of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Whereas the increased risk seems modest compared to their benefits as shown in the literature, vigilance is recommended, specifically, when GLP-1RAs are used for off label indications.
{"title":"GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Initiation and Risk of Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Comparative Study","authors":"Omar Faour MD , Moheb Boktor MD , Hanford Yau MD , Mustafa Kinaan MD , Ishak A Mansi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100114","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100114","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medications are widely used in managing type 2 diabetes because of their cardio-renal-metabolic benefits. However, concerns persist regarding their potential association with acute pancreatitis (AP) and pancreatic cancer. This study’s objective was to examine the association of GLP-1RAs with the risk of AP and pancreatic cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study used Veterans Health Administration national data during fiscal years 2006 to 2021. Using a new-user active comparator design, we included veterans who initiated either GLP-1RA or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) medication, the latter as an active comparator. The primary outcomes were incident AP and pancreatic cancer. We excluded patients with a history of pancreatitis, pancreatic tumors, pancreatic congenital anomalies, and alcohol use. Secondary analysis included adjusting for confounders that may have been introduced during the follow-up period, such as gallbladder diseases, and <em>post hoc</em> analysis restricted analysis to people who had normal serum lipase during follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We matched 88,972 pairs of GLP-1RA and DPP-4i users on all characteristics. AP was diagnosed in 214 (0.24%) DPP-4i users versus 273 (0.31%) GLP-1RA users (OR 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.53), and pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in 154 (0.17%) DPP-4i users versus 211 (0.24%) GLP-1RA users (OR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.11-1.69). Secondary and <em>post hoc</em> analyses showed results consistent with the primary analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>GLP-1RAs are associated with a modest but statistically significant increase in the risk of AP and pancreatic cancer compared to DPP-4i.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>GLP-1RA use is associated with modestly increased odds ratio of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Whereas the increased risk seems modest compared to their benefits as shown in the literature, vigilance is recommended, specifically, when GLP-1RAs are used for off label indications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145046095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-20DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100116
M. Holliday Davis , Judy Chertok , Shoshana Aronowitz , Rachel French , Jeanmarie Perrone , Ashish P Thakrar , Samantha Huo , Jacqueline Deanna Wilson , Nia Bhadra-Heintz , Lilah Lesniak , Aidan Hecker , Jessica Tolbert , Margaret Lowenstein
Background
Hospitalizations among people who use drugs (PWUD) are increasing, and addiction consult services (ACS) are an emerging best practice for improving care.
Methods
We conducted a web-based needs assessment survey of physicians, advanced practice providers (APP), and nurses at a Philadelphia academic hospital in March 2023 before implementing an ACS. We assessed knowledge gaps, barriers to care, and perceived service needs.
Results
Of 472 clinicians surveyed, 236 responded (50% response rate). Participants felt most prepared to assess withdrawal and diagnose or recognize substance use disorders (SUDs) but lacked confidence in care linkage and harm reduction. Reported barriers included patient social needs, resource availability, and lack of expert consultation.
Conclusions
While most participants agreed that SUDs are treatable, many reported compromised patient care due to inadequate support as well as burnout associated with caring for PWUD. Future work should examine whether ACSs address the perceived barriers to care for hospitalized PWUD while supporting clinicians.
{"title":"Caring for Hospitalized Patients with Substance Use Disorders: An Interprofessional Needs Assessment Survey","authors":"M. Holliday Davis , Judy Chertok , Shoshana Aronowitz , Rachel French , Jeanmarie Perrone , Ashish P Thakrar , Samantha Huo , Jacqueline Deanna Wilson , Nia Bhadra-Heintz , Lilah Lesniak , Aidan Hecker , Jessica Tolbert , Margaret Lowenstein","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100116","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100116","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hospitalizations among people who use drugs (PWUD) are increasing, and addiction consult services (ACS) are an emerging best practice for improving care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a web-based needs assessment survey of physicians, advanced practice providers (APP), and nurses at a Philadelphia academic hospital in March 2023 before implementing an ACS. We assessed knowledge gaps, barriers to care, and perceived service needs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 472 clinicians surveyed, 236 responded (50% response rate). Participants felt most prepared to assess withdrawal and diagnose or recognize substance use disorders (SUDs) but lacked confidence in care linkage and harm reduction. Reported barriers included patient social needs, resource availability, and lack of expert consultation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While most participants agreed that SUDs are treatable, many reported compromised patient care due to inadequate support as well as burnout associated with caring for PWUD. Future work should examine whether ACSs address the perceived barriers to care for hospitalized PWUD while supporting clinicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145095208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of antidiabetic drugs that have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease. However, their effects on fracture risk are unclear and may depend on the type and duration of treatment. This meta-analysis compares the fracture risk of different antidiabetic drugs, including SGLT2 inhibitors, based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched 4 databases for RCTs that reported fracture events in patients with T2DM who received different antidiabetic drugs. We included 117 RCTs that compared 9 types of antidiabetic drugs: SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, insulin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, meglitinides, biguanides, and sulfonylureas. We used a statistical method called Frequentist meta-analysis to combine data from different studies and compare different treatments. The results showed that SGLT2 inhibitors were the only drug that significantly reduced the fracture risk compared to placebo and other drugs (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98). The other antidiabetic drugs did not show any significant difference from placebo or from each other. The mechanisms behind the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone health are not well understood and may involve changes in calcium, phosphate, sodium, and arginine vasopressin levels in the body. SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated a favorable skeletal safety profile among antidiabetic drugs. More long-term studies focused on fracture as a primary outcome are needed to fully understand how SGLT2 inhibitors affect bone health and fracture risk in patients with T2DM.
{"title":"The Impact of Different Antidiabetic Drugs on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With a Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors","authors":"Bushra Admani MBBS , Fizza Zehra Raza MBBS , Fatima Siddiqui MBBS , Muhammad Talal Ashraf MBBS , Muhammad Khuzzaim Khan MBBS , Ifra Habib MBBS , Ayesha Usman MBBS , Bareeha Mansoor MBBS , Zaira Nadeem MBBS , Rana Jahanzeb Ghaffer MBBS , Muhammad Riyyan MBBS , Sawaira Sajid MBBS , Muhammad Hassan Ali Chania MBBS , Mahnoor Saleem MBBS , Saad Javaid MBBS , Nikhil Duseja MBBS , Hussam Al Hennawi MD , Sunita Lakhani MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100115","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100115","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of antidiabetic drugs that have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease. However, their effects on fracture risk are unclear and may depend on the type and duration of treatment. This meta-analysis compares the fracture risk of different antidiabetic drugs, including SGLT2 inhibitors, based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched 4 databases for RCTs that reported fracture events in patients with T2DM who received different antidiabetic drugs. We included 117 RCTs that compared 9 types of antidiabetic drugs: SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, insulin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, meglitinides, biguanides, and sulfonylureas. We used a statistical method called Frequentist meta-analysis to combine data from different studies and compare different treatments. The results showed that SGLT2 inhibitors were the only drug that significantly reduced the fracture risk compared to placebo and other drugs (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98). The other antidiabetic drugs did not show any significant difference from placebo or from each other. The mechanisms behind the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone health are not well understood and may involve changes in calcium, phosphate, sodium, and arginine vasopressin levels in the body. SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated a favorable skeletal safety profile among antidiabetic drugs. More long-term studies focused on fracture as a primary outcome are needed to fully understand how SGLT2 inhibitors affect bone health and fracture risk in patients with T2DM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145046096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100111
Peter Novak MD, PhD , David M. Systrom MD , Sadie P. Marciano PA-C , Alexandra Witte PA-C , Arabella Warren MD, PhD , Donna Felsenstein MD , Matthew P. Giannetti MD , Matthew J. Hamilton MD , Jennifer Nicoloro-SantaBarbara PhD , Mariana Castells MD , Khosro Farhad MD , David M. Pilgrim MD , William J. Mullally MD , Mark C. Fishman MD , Jeff M. Milunsky MD , Aubrey Milunsky MD , Joel Krier MD
Background
Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) affects multiple systems, but comprehensive evaluations of a larger sample of hEDS patients are lacking. The objective of this study was to describe cerebrovascular, autonomic, and neuropathic features of hEDS.
Methods
This retrospective case-control study was conducted at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital between 2016-2023. Data from hEDS patients who completed autonomic testing and skin biopsies were analyzed. Outcome measures include validated surveys (Survey of Autonomic Functions, Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (SAS)) and autonomic function testing (Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, head-up tilt and sudomotor), cerebrovascular (cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) in the middle cerebral artery), respiratory (capnography), and neuropathic (skin biopsies for assessment of small fiber neuropathy) testing and inflammatory/ autoimmune markers.
Results
Total 270 hEDS patients were analyzed and compared to 29 healthy controls. Common hEDS complaints (prevalence > 90% ) were orthostatic sudomotor, vasomotor, gastrointestinal, and pain. Orthostatic cerebral blood flow velocity was reduced in 79% of hEDS and correlated with orthostatic dizziness. The head-up tilt test revealed postural tachycardia syndrome (prevalence 33%), hypocapnic cerebral hypoperfusion (22%), orthostatic cerebral hypoperfusion syndrome (18%), and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (9%). Widespread but mild autonomic failure was present in 90% of hEDS patients on autonomic testing. Small fiber neuropathy using structural criteria was detected in 64%, and using combined structural and functional criteria in 82%.
Conclusions
This study provided evidence of cerebrovascular dysregulation with reduced orthostatic cerebral blood flow velocity associated with symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion, frequent small fiber neuropathy, and widespread but mild autonomic failure in hEDS.
{"title":"Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Cerebrovascular, Autonomic and Neuropathic Features","authors":"Peter Novak MD, PhD , David M. Systrom MD , Sadie P. Marciano PA-C , Alexandra Witte PA-C , Arabella Warren MD, PhD , Donna Felsenstein MD , Matthew P. Giannetti MD , Matthew J. Hamilton MD , Jennifer Nicoloro-SantaBarbara PhD , Mariana Castells MD , Khosro Farhad MD , David M. Pilgrim MD , William J. Mullally MD , Mark C. Fishman MD , Jeff M. Milunsky MD , Aubrey Milunsky MD , Joel Krier MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100111","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100111","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) affects multiple systems, but comprehensive evaluations of a larger sample of hEDS patients are lacking. The objective of this study was to describe cerebrovascular, autonomic, and neuropathic features of hEDS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective case-control study was conducted at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital between 2016-2023. Data from hEDS patients who completed autonomic testing and skin biopsies were analyzed. Outcome measures include validated surveys (Survey of Autonomic Functions, Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (SAS)) and autonomic function testing (Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, head-up tilt and sudomotor), cerebrovascular (cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) in the middle cerebral artery), respiratory (capnography), and neuropathic (skin biopsies for assessment of small fiber neuropathy) testing and inflammatory/ autoimmune markers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Total 270 hEDS patients were analyzed and compared to 29 healthy controls. Common hEDS complaints (prevalence > 90% ) were orthostatic sudomotor, vasomotor, gastrointestinal, and pain. Orthostatic cerebral blood flow velocity was reduced in 79% of hEDS and correlated with orthostatic dizziness. The head-up tilt test revealed postural tachycardia syndrome (prevalence 33%), hypocapnic cerebral hypoperfusion (22%), orthostatic cerebral hypoperfusion syndrome (18%), and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (9%). Widespread but mild autonomic failure was present in 90% of hEDS patients on autonomic testing. Small fiber neuropathy using structural criteria was detected in 64%, and using combined structural and functional criteria in 82%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provided evidence of cerebrovascular dysregulation with reduced orthostatic cerebral blood flow velocity associated with symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion, frequent small fiber neuropathy, and widespread but mild autonomic failure in hEDS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144827126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}