LEVEL OF EMPATHY AND SEVERITY OF PSYCHOPATHIC TRAITS IN MEDICAL, LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY STUDENTS

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Acta Neuropsychologica Pub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.4618
E. Wilczek-Rużyczka, Michał Kupczyk
{"title":"LEVEL OF EMPATHY AND SEVERITY OF PSYCHOPATHIC TRAITS IN MEDICAL, LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY STUDENTS","authors":"E. Wilczek-Rużyczka, Michał Kupczyk","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.4618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to show the differences between groups of medical, law and psychology students in terms of empathy and psychopathy, as well as to show whether there are relationships between these variables in the studied groups.\n\nThe study involved 70 female and 50 male students, constituting three equal groups of 40 people each, studying Medicine, Law and Psychology respectively. Two standardized tools were used in the study: the Index of Interpersonal Reactivity (IRI) by M.H Davis and the Polish adaptation of I. Pilch and her team's Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM), the original version of which was developed by Patrick, Fowles and Krueger, as well as a specially designed sociodemographic questionnaire.\n\nThe study showed an inverse relationship between empathy and psychopathy and that there were differences in both empathy and psychopathy levels between different groups of students. Law students had lower levels of empathy in two di mensions according to the IRI than medical and psychology students. When analyzing the severity of some psychopathic traits and the overall psychopathy score according to TriPM, it was found that law students had the highest levels in the overall psychopathy score and meanness, but no statistically significant differences were observed in other TriPM variables between the groups studied.\n\nLaw students had the lowest empathy scores of the groups studied, and medical students had slightly lower empathy scores than psychology students. It was also shown that law students had the highest overall psychopathy score of the three groups studied. Negative correlational relationships between empathy and psychopathy were observed in medical and law students – indicating that higher levels of empathy are associated with lower levels of psychopathy.\n\n","PeriodicalId":43280,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.4618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to show the differences between groups of medical, law and psychology students in terms of empathy and psychopathy, as well as to show whether there are relationships between these variables in the studied groups. The study involved 70 female and 50 male students, constituting three equal groups of 40 people each, studying Medicine, Law and Psychology respectively. Two standardized tools were used in the study: the Index of Interpersonal Reactivity (IRI) by M.H Davis and the Polish adaptation of I. Pilch and her team's Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM), the original version of which was developed by Patrick, Fowles and Krueger, as well as a specially designed sociodemographic questionnaire. The study showed an inverse relationship between empathy and psychopathy and that there were differences in both empathy and psychopathy levels between different groups of students. Law students had lower levels of empathy in two di mensions according to the IRI than medical and psychology students. When analyzing the severity of some psychopathic traits and the overall psychopathy score according to TriPM, it was found that law students had the highest levels in the overall psychopathy score and meanness, but no statistically significant differences were observed in other TriPM variables between the groups studied. Law students had the lowest empathy scores of the groups studied, and medical students had slightly lower empathy scores than psychology students. It was also shown that law students had the highest overall psychopathy score of the three groups studied. Negative correlational relationships between empathy and psychopathy were observed in medical and law students – indicating that higher levels of empathy are associated with lower levels of psychopathy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学、法律和心理学专业学生的共情水平和精神病特征的严重程度
本研究的目的是显示医学、法律和心理学学生群体在共情和精神病方面的差异,以及研究群体中这些变量之间是否存在关系。这项研究涉及70名女学生和50名男学生,分为三组,每组40人,分别学习医学、法律和心理学。研究中使用了两种标准化的工具:M.H Davis的人际反应指数(IRI)和I. Pilch及其团队的Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM)的波兰版,TriPM的原始版本是由Patrick, Fowles和Krueger开发的,还有一份专门设计的社会人口调查问卷。研究表明,共情与精神病态呈负相关,不同群体学生的共情水平和精神病态水平均存在差异。根据IRI,法律专业的学生在两个维度上的同理心水平低于医学和心理学专业的学生。在对部分精神病态特征的严重程度和TriPM总分进行分析时发现,法律专业学生的精神病态总分和平均分最高,但其他TriPM变量在两组间无统计学差异。法律专业学生的共情得分最低,医学院学生的共情得分略低于心理学专业学生。研究还显示,在被研究的三组学生中,法律系学生的总体精神病得分最高。同理心和精神病之间的负相关关系在医学和法律专业的学生中被观察到,这表明同理心水平越高,精神病水平越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
42.90%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF REHABILITATION OFFERED ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOLS IN REDUCING CHRONIC FRONTAL SYNDROME IN PATIENTS 10-YEARS FOLLOWING NEUROSURGERY FOR POST-TRAUMATIC INTRACEREBRAL HEMATOMA Empathy as a determinant of perceived stress and styles of coping with stress in medical, law and psychology students NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19: CURRENT APPROACH AND CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FACTORS ASSOCIATED TO BURN-OUT AMONG IBN SINA HOSPITAL PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in terms of psychosomatic effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1