Cognitive load in academic clinical simulation activities. Cross-sectional study

Mariana González La Rotta, V. Mazzanti, Laura Serna Rivas, C. A. Triana Schoonewolff
{"title":"Cognitive load in academic clinical simulation activities. Cross-sectional study","authors":"Mariana González La Rotta, V. Mazzanti, Laura Serna Rivas, C. A. Triana Schoonewolff","doi":"10.5554/22562087.e1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cognitive load determines working memory ability to store and retain information in long-term memory, thus conditioning learning. \nObjective: To compare cognitive loads among different simulation activities, including anesthesia and surgery simulation workshops in medical students. \nMethods: Cross-sectional analytical observational study. Two cognitive load measurement scales (Paas and NASA-TLX) were given to the students after each simulation workshop. Comparisons were made based on the scores derived from the scales. \nResults: Relevant differences were found in terms of the mental effort assessed by means of the Paas scale, as relates to student rotation order in the airway management workshop, with a greater effort being found in the group that rotated initially in surgery (6.19 vs. 5.53; p = 0.029). The workshop with the highest associated rate of frustration was the airway management workshop. Higher scores were obtained for this workshop in all the items of the NASA-TLX scale, reflecting a higher cognitive load when compared to the others. \nConclusion: It was not possible to determine whether higher scores in some of the activities were associated with the inherent difficulty of airway management or the specific workshop design. Consequently, further studies are required to distinguish between those components in order to improve the way learning activities are designed.","PeriodicalId":36529,"journal":{"name":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive load determines working memory ability to store and retain information in long-term memory, thus conditioning learning. Objective: To compare cognitive loads among different simulation activities, including anesthesia and surgery simulation workshops in medical students. Methods: Cross-sectional analytical observational study. Two cognitive load measurement scales (Paas and NASA-TLX) were given to the students after each simulation workshop. Comparisons were made based on the scores derived from the scales. Results: Relevant differences were found in terms of the mental effort assessed by means of the Paas scale, as relates to student rotation order in the airway management workshop, with a greater effort being found in the group that rotated initially in surgery (6.19 vs. 5.53; p = 0.029). The workshop with the highest associated rate of frustration was the airway management workshop. Higher scores were obtained for this workshop in all the items of the NASA-TLX scale, reflecting a higher cognitive load when compared to the others. Conclusion: It was not possible to determine whether higher scores in some of the activities were associated with the inherent difficulty of airway management or the specific workshop design. Consequently, further studies are required to distinguish between those components in order to improve the way learning activities are designed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术临床模拟活动中的认知负荷。横断面研究
引言:认知负荷决定了工作记忆在长期记忆中存储和保留信息的能力,从而制约学习。目的:比较不同模拟活动(包括麻醉和外科模拟讲习班)在医学生中的认知负荷。方法:横断面分析观察研究。每个模拟研讨会结束后,给学生两个认知负荷测量量表(Paas和NASA-TLX)。根据量表得出的分数进行比较。结果:通过Paas量表评估的心理努力与气道管理研讨会中的学生轮换顺序有关,发现存在相关差异,在最初在手术中轮换的那一组中发现了更大的努力(6.19对5.53;p=0.029)。相关挫折率最高的研讨会是气道管理研讨会。本次研讨会在NASA-TLX量表的所有项目中都获得了更高的分数,这反映出与其他项目相比,认知负荷更高。结论:无法确定某些活动的高分是否与气道管理的固有困难或特定的车间设计有关。因此,需要进一步的研究来区分这些组成部分,以改进学习活动的设计方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The environmental responsibility of modern anesthesiology and perioperative care Características del paro cardiaco extrahospitalario atendido por operadores de ambulancias en Medellín. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de base poblacional Shortage of perioperative supplies and drugs: Theory and practical implications Respuesta hemodinámica a dosis subanestésicas de ketamina en dolor posoperatorio: revisión sistemática ChatGPT's learning and reasoning capacity in anesthesiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1