Darrel Wanzer-Serrano’s The New York Young Lords and the Struggle for Liberation: Theoretical Contributions

Q1 Arts and Humanities Advances in the History of Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/15362426.2018.1526549
Kent A. Ono
{"title":"Darrel Wanzer-Serrano’s The New York Young Lords and the Struggle for Liberation: Theoretical Contributions","authors":"Kent A. Ono","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2018.1526549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his book, The New York Young Lords and the Struggle for Liberation, Professor Darrel Wanzer-Serrano makes several important contributions to rhetorical, communication, and Latinx, race and ethnic studies, and socialmovements scholarship. Among those contributions is his detailed historical study of the Young Lords as a social-movement group, which had been, until his study, barely (if at all) mentioned in communication literature. Additionally, his study of the Puerto Rican diaspora, specifically Nuyorican culture, identity, and politics within communication literature, is groundbreaking. And, his thorough, detailed, meticulous historical study of the Young Lords’ rhetoric provides a model of contemporary rhetorical scholarship that should be read and then modeled. The contribution I wish to focus on for this commentary is his theoretical contribution to rhetorical scholarship. Work within the field has studied colonialism through critiques of rhetorics of colonialism (Endres; Parameswaran; Stevens; Stuckey and Murphy) and empire (Abbott; Hartnett and Mercieca; Owen and Ehrenhaus; Perez; Pollini; Sandoval; Spurr), postcolonial critique (Dora; Hegde; Gajjala; Hasian; Jarratt; Kavoori; Kelly; Olson and Worsham; Parameswaran; Schwartz-DuPre; Shome; Wang), and neocolonial critique (Ayotte and Husain; Black; Buescher; Kuswa and Ayotte; McKinnon; Ono; Ranachan and Parmett; Rogers; Vats and Nishime) lenses. Moreover, critiques of colonialism have often been approached as what McKerrow calls “critiques of domination.” Wanzer-Serrano’s book offers a theory of rhetoric and decolonization, distinguished from postcolonial scholarship. Not only does WanzerSerrano offer a theory of decoloniality, but he also suggests that the Young Lords challenged decolonization in important ways. He argues, “In this book, I make the case that the New York Young Lords’ enactment of differential consciousness pushes the boundaries of decolonial theory. Through critical performances of border thinking, epistemic disobedience, and delinking, the Young Lords crafted a decolonial praxis that resisted ideological oversimplification and generated new possibilities and spaces for activism in their immediate contexts and beyond” (7).","PeriodicalId":38049,"journal":{"name":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","volume":"21 1","pages":"315 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2018.1526549","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2018.1526549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In his book, The New York Young Lords and the Struggle for Liberation, Professor Darrel Wanzer-Serrano makes several important contributions to rhetorical, communication, and Latinx, race and ethnic studies, and socialmovements scholarship. Among those contributions is his detailed historical study of the Young Lords as a social-movement group, which had been, until his study, barely (if at all) mentioned in communication literature. Additionally, his study of the Puerto Rican diaspora, specifically Nuyorican culture, identity, and politics within communication literature, is groundbreaking. And, his thorough, detailed, meticulous historical study of the Young Lords’ rhetoric provides a model of contemporary rhetorical scholarship that should be read and then modeled. The contribution I wish to focus on for this commentary is his theoretical contribution to rhetorical scholarship. Work within the field has studied colonialism through critiques of rhetorics of colonialism (Endres; Parameswaran; Stevens; Stuckey and Murphy) and empire (Abbott; Hartnett and Mercieca; Owen and Ehrenhaus; Perez; Pollini; Sandoval; Spurr), postcolonial critique (Dora; Hegde; Gajjala; Hasian; Jarratt; Kavoori; Kelly; Olson and Worsham; Parameswaran; Schwartz-DuPre; Shome; Wang), and neocolonial critique (Ayotte and Husain; Black; Buescher; Kuswa and Ayotte; McKinnon; Ono; Ranachan and Parmett; Rogers; Vats and Nishime) lenses. Moreover, critiques of colonialism have often been approached as what McKerrow calls “critiques of domination.” Wanzer-Serrano’s book offers a theory of rhetoric and decolonization, distinguished from postcolonial scholarship. Not only does WanzerSerrano offer a theory of decoloniality, but he also suggests that the Young Lords challenged decolonization in important ways. He argues, “In this book, I make the case that the New York Young Lords’ enactment of differential consciousness pushes the boundaries of decolonial theory. Through critical performances of border thinking, epistemic disobedience, and delinking, the Young Lords crafted a decolonial praxis that resisted ideological oversimplification and generated new possibilities and spaces for activism in their immediate contexts and beyond” (7).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞拉诺的《纽约青年贵族与解放斗争》:理论贡献
Darrel Wanzer Serrano教授在其著作《纽约青年贵族与解放斗争》中,对修辞、传播和拉丁裔、种族和民族研究以及社会运动学术做出了几项重要贡献。在这些贡献中,他对青年贵族作为一个社会运动团体进行了详细的历史研究,在他的研究之前,这在传播文学中几乎没有(如果有的话)被提及。此外,他对波多黎各侨民的研究,特别是传播文学中的纽约里文化、身份和政治,具有开创性意义。而且,他对年轻贵族修辞学的全面、详细、细致的历史研究为当代修辞学提供了一个应该阅读然后模仿的模式。我想在这篇评论中重点关注的是他对修辞学的理论贡献。该领域的工作通过对殖民主义修辞的批评来研究殖民主义(Endres;Parameswaran;Stevens;Stuckey和Murphy)和帝国主义(Abbott;Hartnett和Mercieca;Owen和Ehrenhaus;Perez;Pollini;Sandoval;Spurr),后殖民主义批评(Dora;Hegde;Gajjala;Hasian;Jarratt;Kavoori;Kelly;Olson和Worsham;Parameswalan;Schwartz DuPre;Shome;Wang),和新殖民主义批判(阿约特和侯赛因;布莱克;布舍尔;库斯瓦和阿约特;麦金农;小野;拉纳坎和帕米特;罗杰斯;瓦茨和尼西姆)镜头。此外,对殖民主义的批评经常被视为McKerrow所说的“对统治的批评”。Wanzer Serrano的书提供了一种修辞和非殖民化理论,与后殖民学术不同。WanzerSerrano不仅提出了非殖民化理论,而且他还认为年轻贵族在重要方面挑战了非殖民化。他认为,“在这本书中,我提出了一个观点,即纽约青年贵族对差异意识的形成突破了非殖民化理论的界限。通过对边界思维、认识上的不服从和脱钩的批判性表现,青年贵族们制定了一种非殖民化实践,抵制意识形态的过于简单化,并在他们的时代为激进主义创造了新的可能性和空间ate上下文及其他内容”(7)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Advances in the History of Rhetoric Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
“Anarchy in the USA”: Win McNamee’s Capitol Riot Photographs and the Rhetoric of Desecration Museums in Motu in the Anthropocene: From Active Space to Spatial Actions Feminist Movements: The Role of Coalition, Travel, and Labor in the Third World Women’s Alliance The Moves of Civil Rights: Examining the 1957 Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom Phantom Mobility: Coercion, Conversion, and Letter Writing in Colonial Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1