Fighting fake reviews: Authenticated anonymous reviews using identity verification

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Horizons Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2023.08.002
Aishwarya Deep Shukla, Jie Mein Goh
{"title":"Fighting fake reviews: Authenticated anonymous reviews using identity verification","authors":"Aishwarya Deep Shukla,&nbsp;Jie Mein Goh","doi":"10.1016/j.bushor.2023.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fake reviews have become a pervasive problem in the realm of online commerce, affecting businesses and consumers alike. These fraudulent reviews can cause significant damage to the credibility of companies and negatively impact consumer welfare. While various platforms, such as Yelp and Amazon, have implemented measures to combat fake reviews, these efforts have been largely ineffective and, at times, even exacerbated the problem. As a result, on November 8, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it is soliciting input for possible regulations around ways to fight fake reviews. The growing sophistication of Artificial Intelligence—particularly generative AI technologies like ChatGPT—worsens the problem by enabling the production of human-like fake reviews at an unprecedented scale. This lends new urgency to the fake review problem, so it is imperative to examine the pros and cons of extant approaches and propose alternative approaches that are better equipped to tackle the issue. In this article, we introduce a novel approach using <em>digital identity verification</em>, which involves verifying a user’s identity via various forms of digital information that represent the individual and have not been applied to online reviews. We highlight the limitations of extant techniques and outline ways in which digital identity verification may be a promising solution to the problem of fake reviews. Potential benefits and challenges, as well as the effectiveness of our proposed approach in addressing the issue of fake reviews, are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48347,"journal":{"name":"Business Horizons","volume":"67 1","pages":"Pages 71-81"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000939/pdfft?md5=d9e135aec8dc5a0f39f8a0c11b697a7c&pid=1-s2.0-S0007681323000939-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fake reviews have become a pervasive problem in the realm of online commerce, affecting businesses and consumers alike. These fraudulent reviews can cause significant damage to the credibility of companies and negatively impact consumer welfare. While various platforms, such as Yelp and Amazon, have implemented measures to combat fake reviews, these efforts have been largely ineffective and, at times, even exacerbated the problem. As a result, on November 8, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it is soliciting input for possible regulations around ways to fight fake reviews. The growing sophistication of Artificial Intelligence—particularly generative AI technologies like ChatGPT—worsens the problem by enabling the production of human-like fake reviews at an unprecedented scale. This lends new urgency to the fake review problem, so it is imperative to examine the pros and cons of extant approaches and propose alternative approaches that are better equipped to tackle the issue. In this article, we introduce a novel approach using digital identity verification, which involves verifying a user’s identity via various forms of digital information that represent the individual and have not been applied to online reviews. We highlight the limitations of extant techniques and outline ways in which digital identity verification may be a promising solution to the problem of fake reviews. Potential benefits and challenges, as well as the effectiveness of our proposed approach in addressing the issue of fake reviews, are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打击虚假评论:使用身份验证对匿名评论进行身份验证
虚假评论已成为在线商务领域的一个普遍问题,对企业和消费者都造成了影响。这些虚假评论会对企业的信誉造成重大损害,并对消费者的利益产生负面影响。虽然 Yelp 和亚马逊等各种平台已采取措施打击虚假评论,但这些努力基本上没有效果,有时甚至使问题更加严重。因此,2022 年 11 月 8 日,美国联邦贸易委员会宣布,正在就打击虚假评论的可能法规征求意见。人工智能--尤其是像 ChatGPT 这样的生成式人工智能技术--的日益成熟使问题更加严重,因为它能以前所未有的规模制造出类似人类的虚假评论。这给虚假评论问题带来了新的紧迫性,因此,当务之急是研究现有方法的利弊,并提出能更好地应对这一问题的替代方法。在本文中,我们介绍了一种使用数字身份验证的新方法,即通过代表个人的各种形式的数字信息验证用户身份,这种方法尚未应用于在线评论。我们强调了现有技术的局限性,并概述了数字身份验证可能成为解决虚假评论问题的有效方法。我们还讨论了潜在的好处和挑战,以及我们提出的方法在解决虚假评论问题方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Business Horizons
Business Horizons BUSINESS-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Business Horizons, the bimonthly journal of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, is dedicated to publishing original articles that appeal to both business academics and practitioners. Our editorial focus is on covering a diverse array of topics within the broader field of business, with a particular emphasis on identifying critical business issues and proposing practical solutions. Our goal is to inspire readers to approach business practices from new and innovative perspectives. Business Horizons occupies a distinctive position among business publications by offering articles that strike a balance between academic rigor and practical relevance. As such, our articles are grounded in scholarly research yet presented in a clear and accessible format, making them relevant to a broad audience within the business community.
期刊最新文献
Inside front cover - ed board CIBER Acknowledgment Business and Peace, Part I: Insights from the first 20 years of B+P scholarship Inside front cover - ed board Peacebuilding by MNE subsidiaries: The role of intangible capital and local initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1