Assyrian Imperialism and Its Impact on the Sovereignty of Ancient Israel: Assessing the Motives Behind the Prophet Isaiah’s Message of Neutrality (Isaiah Chapter 6-39)

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09018328.2022.2085906
M. A. Bowa
{"title":"Assyrian Imperialism and Its Impact on the Sovereignty of Ancient Israel: Assessing the Motives Behind the Prophet Isaiah’s Message of Neutrality (Isaiah Chapter 6-39)","authors":"M. A. Bowa","doi":"10.1080/09018328.2022.2085906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Assyria’s expansionist policy during the 8th- century B.C.E was indeed a force to reckon with and it was practically inevitable for this expansionist policy not to trigger various response mechanisms especially from the weaker nations. These responses varied from the formation of anti-Assyrian coalitions to opting for neutrality. The later response is most immediately expressed in the prophesies of Isaiah. As such, although scholarship has convincingly established that the prophet’s message revolved around the political developments of the hegemony of Assyria, little has been written regarding the possible reasons that influenced the prophet’s option for neutrality in the face of Assyrian Imperialism. While the argument that the prophet’s decision was largely influenced by his religious convictions and trust in Yahweh is sustainable, this paper argues that the prophet Isaiah’s stance was predominantly influenced by his political understanding of how empires like Assyria functioned. Contrary to the common position, this paper contends that the decision had more do with the prophet’s political convictions than it had to do with his religious convictions. As such, this paper examines Assyria’s imperial tactics and demonstrates how these predominantly informed Isaiah’s policy of neutrality over and above the prophet’s religious persuasions.","PeriodicalId":42456,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2022.2085906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Assyria’s expansionist policy during the 8th- century B.C.E was indeed a force to reckon with and it was practically inevitable for this expansionist policy not to trigger various response mechanisms especially from the weaker nations. These responses varied from the formation of anti-Assyrian coalitions to opting for neutrality. The later response is most immediately expressed in the prophesies of Isaiah. As such, although scholarship has convincingly established that the prophet’s message revolved around the political developments of the hegemony of Assyria, little has been written regarding the possible reasons that influenced the prophet’s option for neutrality in the face of Assyrian Imperialism. While the argument that the prophet’s decision was largely influenced by his religious convictions and trust in Yahweh is sustainable, this paper argues that the prophet Isaiah’s stance was predominantly influenced by his political understanding of how empires like Assyria functioned. Contrary to the common position, this paper contends that the decision had more do with the prophet’s political convictions than it had to do with his religious convictions. As such, this paper examines Assyria’s imperial tactics and demonstrates how these predominantly informed Isaiah’s policy of neutrality over and above the prophet’s religious persuasions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚述帝国主义及其对古代以色列主权的影响:先知以赛亚中立信息背后的动机评估(以赛亚书第6-39章)
摘要公元前8世纪亚述的扩张主义政策确实是一股需要考虑的力量,而这种扩张主义政策实际上不可避免地不会引发各种反应机制,尤其是来自较弱国家的反应机制。这些反应各不相同,从组成反亚述联盟到选择中立。后来的回应最直接地表达在以赛亚的预言中。因此,尽管学术界已经令人信服地证实,先知的信息围绕着亚述霸权的政治发展,但关于影响先知在面对亚述帝国主义时选择中立的可能原因,几乎没有人写过。虽然先知的决定在很大程度上受到他的宗教信仰和对耶和华的信任的影响这一论点是可持续的,但本文认为,先知以赛亚的立场主要受到他对亚述等帝国如何运作的政治理解的影响。与普遍立场相反,本文认为,这一决定更多地与先知的政治信仰有关,而不是与他的宗教信仰有关。因此,本文考察了亚述的帝国策略,并展示了这些策略如何主要影响以赛亚的中立政策,而不是先知的宗教信仰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Samuel as Jack-in-the-Box: The Woman of Endor as a Hidden Polemical Story* The Influence of Greek Historiography in 1 Maccabees’ Battle Exhortations An Examination of the Sprouting Horn in Ps 132,17 and Ezek 29,21 Daniel’s Mysticism of Resistance in its Seleucid ContextTimothy L. Seals, Daniel’s Mysticism of Resistance in its Seleucid Context . Lanham-Boulder-New York-London: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2022. X + 166 pp. $95.00. Posttraumatic Growth and Deuteronomistic Redaction of Jer 31,31-34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1