THE AMELIORATION OF BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCES IN TBI PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC FRONTAL SYNDROME AFTER TREATMENT IN DIFFERENT REHABILITATION PROGRAMS

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Acta Neuropsychologica Pub Date : 2019-08-25 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0013.3685
M. Pąchalska, Jolanta Góral-Półrola, A. Mirski, C. Grzywniak, Maria Łuckoś, R. Morga
{"title":"THE AMELIORATION OF BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCES IN TBI PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC FRONTAL SYNDROME AFTER TREATMENT IN DIFFERENT REHABILITATION PROGRAMS","authors":"M. Pąchalska, Jolanta Góral-Półrola, A. Mirski, C. Grzywniak, Maria Łuckoś, R. Morga","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.3685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the effectiveness of three different rehabilitation programs for chronic behavioral disorders in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with orbito-frontal damage (OFC), incurred from 13 to 15 years prior to enrollment.\n\nFrom among 547 adult patients with severe TBIs treated neurosurgically from 1999 to 2003, 60 were selected for the study, divided into three groups of 20, matched for age and sex. Each group received one of three different rehabilitation protocols. Group A received a comprehensive program with two components: (1) a 6-month early neuropsychological rehabilitation program targeting cognitive deficits, beginning immediately post-injury, and (2) the “Academy of Life” program, with weekly meetings aimed at reducing behavioral disorders in social transactions. Group B received only cognitive rehabilitation, while Group C received only the “Academy of Life” progam. The Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBInv) was used to assess behavioral disorders at baseline and again after completion of the study.\n\nAt baseline, all 60 patients still displayed all or most of the common behavioral symptoms characteristic of frontal syndrome. The improvement achieved by group A (the comprehensive program) was significantly better upon completion of the study than that shown by the patients in groups B (cognitive only) and C (social skills only).\n\nA comprehensive program of rehabilitation, which combines early neuropsychological rehabilitation of cognitive deficits with the “Academy of Life” program, aimed at improving social skills, proved to be more effective than either of these two components administered without the other\n\n","PeriodicalId":43280,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.3685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of three different rehabilitation programs for chronic behavioral disorders in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with orbito-frontal damage (OFC), incurred from 13 to 15 years prior to enrollment. From among 547 adult patients with severe TBIs treated neurosurgically from 1999 to 2003, 60 were selected for the study, divided into three groups of 20, matched for age and sex. Each group received one of three different rehabilitation protocols. Group A received a comprehensive program with two components: (1) a 6-month early neuropsychological rehabilitation program targeting cognitive deficits, beginning immediately post-injury, and (2) the “Academy of Life” program, with weekly meetings aimed at reducing behavioral disorders in social transactions. Group B received only cognitive rehabilitation, while Group C received only the “Academy of Life” progam. The Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBInv) was used to assess behavioral disorders at baseline and again after completion of the study. At baseline, all 60 patients still displayed all or most of the common behavioral symptoms characteristic of frontal syndrome. The improvement achieved by group A (the comprehensive program) was significantly better upon completion of the study than that shown by the patients in groups B (cognitive only) and C (social skills only). A comprehensive program of rehabilitation, which combines early neuropsychological rehabilitation of cognitive deficits with the “Academy of Life” program, aimed at improving social skills, proved to be more effective than either of these two components administered without the other
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同康复方案对慢性额综合征TBI患者行为障碍的改善
我们评估了三种不同的康复方案对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)合并眶额损伤(OFC)患者慢性行为障碍的疗效,这些患者在入组前发生了13至15年。从1999年至2003年接受神经外科治疗的547例严重脑损伤成年患者中,选择60例进行研究,按年龄和性别分为三组,每组20人。每组接受三种不同康复方案中的一种。A组接受了由两个部分组成的综合计划:(1)6个月的早期神经心理康复计划,目标是认知缺陷,在受伤后立即开始;(2)“生活学院”计划,每周举行会议,旨在减少社会交往中的行为障碍。B组只接受认知康复治疗,C组只接受“生命学院”治疗。使用额叶行为量表(FBInv)在基线和研究结束后再次评估行为障碍。在基线时,所有60例患者仍表现出额叶综合征的全部或大部分常见行为症状。在研究结束时,A组(综合方案)取得的改善明显好于B组(仅认知)和C组(仅社交技能)。一项综合康复计划,将认知缺陷的早期神经心理康复与旨在提高社交技能的“生活学院”计划相结合,证明比单独使用这两个组成部分更有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
42.90%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF REHABILITATION OFFERED ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOLS IN REDUCING CHRONIC FRONTAL SYNDROME IN PATIENTS 10-YEARS FOLLOWING NEUROSURGERY FOR POST-TRAUMATIC INTRACEREBRAL HEMATOMA Empathy as a determinant of perceived stress and styles of coping with stress in medical, law and psychology students NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19: CURRENT APPROACH AND CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FACTORS ASSOCIATED TO BURN-OUT AMONG IBN SINA HOSPITAL PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in terms of psychosomatic effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1