Crowdfunding credit services under the new proposal for a new Directive on Consumer Credits

Q2 Social Sciences Law and Financial Markets Review Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/17521440.2023.2174381
K. Sein
{"title":"Crowdfunding credit services under the new proposal for a new Directive on Consumer Credits","authors":"K. Sein","doi":"10.1080/17521440.2023.2174381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article analyses some of the core rules suggested for crowdfunding credit services in the proposal of the new Consumer Credit Directive, concentrating on the information obligations towards consumers, the obligation of creditworthiness assessment, and the newly introduced principle of non-discrimination. It concludes that whereas the suggested rules would help to raise the consumer protection level in the EU, it does not adequately address all the risks created by these services nor provide the consumers borrowing over such platforms with the same level of protection as consumers taking out ‘normal’ consumer credit. Placing information obligations and the obligation to assess consumers’ creditworthiness to crowdfunding credit services providers is justified due to the gatekeeper position of the platforms. The introduction of the non-discrimination principle, however, would create an obligation to contract for the crowdfunding credit services providers and expose them to the risks of litigation in all Member States.","PeriodicalId":43241,"journal":{"name":"Law and Financial Markets Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"221 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Financial Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2023.2174381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The article analyses some of the core rules suggested for crowdfunding credit services in the proposal of the new Consumer Credit Directive, concentrating on the information obligations towards consumers, the obligation of creditworthiness assessment, and the newly introduced principle of non-discrimination. It concludes that whereas the suggested rules would help to raise the consumer protection level in the EU, it does not adequately address all the risks created by these services nor provide the consumers borrowing over such platforms with the same level of protection as consumers taking out ‘normal’ consumer credit. Placing information obligations and the obligation to assess consumers’ creditworthiness to crowdfunding credit services providers is justified due to the gatekeeper position of the platforms. The introduction of the non-discrimination principle, however, would create an obligation to contract for the crowdfunding credit services providers and expose them to the risks of litigation in all Member States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新消费者信贷指令新提案下的众筹信贷服务
摘要:本文分析了新《消费者信贷指令》提案中对众筹信贷服务提出的一些核心规则,重点是对消费者的信息义务、信用评估义务以及新引入的非歧视原则。它的结论是,尽管建议的规则将有助于提高欧盟的消费者保护水平,但它并没有充分解决这些服务产生的所有风险,也没有为在这些平台上借款的消费者提供与消费者获得“正常”消费信贷相同的保护水平。由于众筹信贷服务平台的看门人地位,将信息义务和消费者信用评估义务置于众筹信贷服务提供商是合理的。然而,不歧视原则的引入将使众筹信贷服务提供者有义务签订合同,并使它们面临在所有会员国被起诉的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Law and Financial Markets Review is a new, independent, English language journal devoted to providing high quality information, comment and analysis for lawyers specialising in banking and financial market issues and to others with interests in legal and regulatory developments affecting the financial markets. Published four times a year LFMR contains articles written by leading experts providing a forum for practical guidance on, as well as reflective and topical analysis of, all major jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the interaction between the law and market practice and behaviour.
期刊最新文献
The fallout from the forex cartels: what legacy for foreign exchange regulation? Supervision of conduct of business: ensuring a fair deal for clients in Europe’s smallest member state Unleashing India's inventive capital: intellectual property as loan collateral Fintech: finance, technology and regulation The EU proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and integrity of ESG rating activities on 13 June 2023: the missing piece of sustainable finance regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1