The factors influencing the trajectory of Danish abortion law: From progressive to 50 years of stagnation

Q2 Social Sciences Medical Law International Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.1177/09685332221119504
F. H. Pedersen, J. Herrmann, Laura TD Hansen
{"title":"The factors influencing the trajectory of Danish abortion law: From progressive to 50 years of stagnation","authors":"F. H. Pedersen, J. Herrmann, Laura TD Hansen","doi":"10.1177/09685332221119504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1973, Denmark broke new ground when it introduced abortion as a legal right. We explore the drivers of Danish abortion law reform and demonstrate that liberalization was effectuated as the answer to a number of societal concerns. In observing the absence of autonomy as a winning argument for abortion law reform, we find that the Danish case is in alignment with the existing literature. Moreover, this article contributes to the understanding of how the historical drivers affect modern-day issues in abortion, including the fact that expansive autonomy for women is still not prioritized. Thus, we argue that liberalizing abortion regulation for reasons other than achieving reproductive autonomy comes at a price: downstream, it becomes difficult to achieve full autonomy in health law regulation because the initial reasoning behind liberalization continues to provide a certain framing even for present-day abortion issues. This observation can be of importance for those working in other jurisdictions to implement expansive autonomy in reproductive rights.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"22 1","pages":"277 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332221119504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1973, Denmark broke new ground when it introduced abortion as a legal right. We explore the drivers of Danish abortion law reform and demonstrate that liberalization was effectuated as the answer to a number of societal concerns. In observing the absence of autonomy as a winning argument for abortion law reform, we find that the Danish case is in alignment with the existing literature. Moreover, this article contributes to the understanding of how the historical drivers affect modern-day issues in abortion, including the fact that expansive autonomy for women is still not prioritized. Thus, we argue that liberalizing abortion regulation for reasons other than achieving reproductive autonomy comes at a price: downstream, it becomes difficult to achieve full autonomy in health law regulation because the initial reasoning behind liberalization continues to provide a certain framing even for present-day abortion issues. This observation can be of importance for those working in other jurisdictions to implement expansive autonomy in reproductive rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响丹麦堕胎法轨迹的因素:从进步到停滞50年
1973年,丹麦开创了新局面,将堕胎作为一项合法权利。我们探讨了丹麦堕胎法改革的驱动因素,并证明自由化是为了解决一些社会问题而实现的。通过观察缺乏自主权作为堕胎法改革的制胜论据,我们发现丹麦的案例与现有文献一致。此外,这篇文章有助于理解历史驱动因素如何影响现代堕胎问题,包括妇女的广泛自主权仍然没有得到优先考虑。因此,我们认为,出于实现生殖自主以外的原因而放开堕胎监管是有代价的:在下游,很难在卫生法监管中实现完全自主,因为自由化背后的最初理由甚至为当今的堕胎问题提供了一定的框架。这一意见对于那些在其他司法管辖区实施生殖权利广泛自主权的人来说可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law International
Medical Law International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.
期刊最新文献
Challenges for the legislation enabling egg donation in Switzerland. Book review: Not What the Bus Promised: Health Governance After Brexit Accessing third-party research databases for criminal investigations: Enhancing legal protections and safeguarding public interests Book review: The Disability Bioethics Reader Book review: The Right to Be Protected From Committing Suicide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1