Adopting Affective Science in Composition Studies: A Literature Review

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Emotion Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17540739211071027
Jordan C. V. Taylor
{"title":"Adopting Affective Science in Composition Studies: A Literature Review","authors":"Jordan C. V. Taylor","doi":"10.1177/17540739211071027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews literature in composition studies since affective science's emergence in the 1980s. It focuses on composition studies’ history of adopting findings and theories from affective science, and distinguishes trends in how the field applies those elements in theoretical versus pedagogical contexts. While composition studies’ adoption of affective science in its theorizing has helped the field progress toward a “complete psychology of writing,” affective science's influence on classroom practices has not been so clear cut or direct. However, affective science is a fast-growing, liberal, and multidisciplinary field. As it progresses, composition studies continues to embrace its concepts and theories. This review notes the expectations and limitations developing through this dynamic interdisciplinary relationship.","PeriodicalId":48064,"journal":{"name":"Emotion Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"43 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739211071027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviews literature in composition studies since affective science's emergence in the 1980s. It focuses on composition studies’ history of adopting findings and theories from affective science, and distinguishes trends in how the field applies those elements in theoretical versus pedagogical contexts. While composition studies’ adoption of affective science in its theorizing has helped the field progress toward a “complete psychology of writing,” affective science's influence on classroom practices has not been so clear cut or direct. However, affective science is a fast-growing, liberal, and multidisciplinary field. As it progresses, composition studies continues to embrace its concepts and theories. This review notes the expectations and limitations developing through this dynamic interdisciplinary relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感科学在作文研究中的应用:文献综述
本文对20世纪80年代情感科学兴起以来的作文研究文献进行了综述。它侧重于作文研究采用情感科学的发现和理论的历史,并区分该领域如何在理论与教学背景下应用这些元素的趋势。虽然写作研究在其理论中采用情感科学有助于该领域向“完整的写作心理学”发展,但情感科学对课堂实践的影响并没有如此明确或直接。然而,情感科学是一个快速发展的、自由的、多学科的领域。随着它的发展,构图研究继续拥抱它的概念和理论。这篇综述指出了通过这种动态的跨学科关系发展的期望和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emotion Review
Emotion Review PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Emotion Review is a fully peer reviewed scholarly journal. It adheres to a blinded peer review process in which the reviewer"s name is routinely withheld from the author unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only those papers that meet the scientific and editorial standards of the journal, and fit within the aims and scope of the journal, will be sent for outside review. Emotion Review will focus on ideas about emotion, with "emotion" broadly defined. The Review will publish articles presenting new theories, offering conceptual analyses, reviewing the literature, and debating and critiquing conceptual issues.
期刊最新文献
The Need for New Perspectives on Arousal in Emotion Theory Yearning for the Irretrievable: Nostalgia and Time Curiosity and the Regulation of Affective Memory On the Nature of Nostalgia: A Psychological Perspective Is “Arousal,” as a Scientific Concept, Worse than Useless?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1