Conceptualising a Social Protection Index Framework for a Megacity in China from the Evidence of Guangzhou

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES China-An International Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1353/chn.2022.0027
Jianfeng Feng, L. Liao, Kinglun Ngok
{"title":"Conceptualising a Social Protection Index Framework for a Megacity in China from the Evidence of Guangzhou","authors":"Jianfeng Feng, L. Liao, Kinglun Ngok","doi":"10.1353/chn.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The concept of social protection and its analytical framework have gradually become important tools for analysing the development of social policies globally. However, few studies have examined social protection issues in Chinese megacities. This article uses the social protection index developed by the Asian Development Bank to analyse the development of social protection in Guangzhou, a megacity. Results have shown that between 2013 and 2015, Guangzhou's soaring social protection expenditures and the ongoing improvement of social protection have significantly improved people's standard of living. Despite the narrowing gap in gross domestic product per capita between Guangzhou and developed countries, there is still a huge gap in social protection. In addition, since social policy is heavily biased towards social insurance and social assistance in Chinese megacities, there are far fewer labour market programmes developed for poor people, compared to other developed countries. The authors recommend that Guangzhou increases its social expenditures and focuses on restructuring its social protection system.","PeriodicalId":45391,"journal":{"name":"China-An International Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"140 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2022.0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The concept of social protection and its analytical framework have gradually become important tools for analysing the development of social policies globally. However, few studies have examined social protection issues in Chinese megacities. This article uses the social protection index developed by the Asian Development Bank to analyse the development of social protection in Guangzhou, a megacity. Results have shown that between 2013 and 2015, Guangzhou's soaring social protection expenditures and the ongoing improvement of social protection have significantly improved people's standard of living. Despite the narrowing gap in gross domestic product per capita between Guangzhou and developed countries, there is still a huge gap in social protection. In addition, since social policy is heavily biased towards social insurance and social assistance in Chinese megacities, there are far fewer labour market programmes developed for poor people, compared to other developed countries. The authors recommend that Guangzhou increases its social expenditures and focuses on restructuring its social protection system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于广州实证的中国特大城市社会保障指数框架构想
摘要:社会保护概念及其分析框架已逐渐成为分析全球社会政策发展的重要工具。然而,很少有研究考察中国特大城市的社会保障问题。本文运用亚洲开发银行编制的社会保障指数,对特大城市广州的社会保障发展情况进行了分析。结果表明,2013年至2015年间,广州社会保障支出的飙升和社会保障水平的不断提高显著提高了人们的生活水平。尽管广州的人均国内生产总值与发达国家的差距正在缩小,但在社会保障方面仍存在巨大差距。此外,由于中国大城市的社会政策严重偏向于社会保险和社会援助,与其他发达国家相比,为穷人制定的劳动力市场计划要少得多。建议广州市增加社会支出,重点调整社会保障体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
How the "Rise of Great Power" Restrains Bilateral Trade Flows: Evidence from China and its Trading Partners Layering Ideologies from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping: Tracing Ideological Changes of the Communist Party of China Using Text Analysis China–Asean Relations January 2023 To March 2023: Important Documents When Top-down Meets Bottom-up: Understanding the Logic and Dynamics of Responsive Authoritarianism, based on Central Environmental Inspection in China Afterword and Reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1