Boys can be managed: schools’ student composition and teacher efficacy, a multilevel approach

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teacher Development Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1080/13664530.2022.2092203
Lennart Van Eycken, Mieke Van Houtte
{"title":"Boys can be managed: schools’ student composition and teacher efficacy, a multilevel approach","authors":"Lennart Van Eycken, Mieke Van Houtte","doi":"10.1080/13664530.2022.2092203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Considerable research concerning determinants of teacher efficacy focuses on teachers’ individual characteristics. School characteristics, such as the socioeconomic and gender composition of the school, are largely overlooked. The scant research including schools’ student composition suggests that teachers feel less efficacious when teaching boys with a low socioeconomic status (SES). A multilevel analysis, using data from 1247 teachers in 59 Flemish secondary schools, shows that teachers’ feelings of efficacy do not appear to differ very much between schools, although many studies assumed that the greater part of variance in teacher efficacy could be found between schools. The socioeconomic composition of the school does not affect teacher efficacy. Gender composition, however, does influence teacher efficacy, as teachers display more efficacy in classroom management and experience more general efficacy when teaching mostly boys. The unexpected finding that teachers seem to feel more efficacious in classroom management when teaching mostly boys is discussed.","PeriodicalId":46208,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Development","volume":"26 1","pages":"531 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2092203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Considerable research concerning determinants of teacher efficacy focuses on teachers’ individual characteristics. School characteristics, such as the socioeconomic and gender composition of the school, are largely overlooked. The scant research including schools’ student composition suggests that teachers feel less efficacious when teaching boys with a low socioeconomic status (SES). A multilevel analysis, using data from 1247 teachers in 59 Flemish secondary schools, shows that teachers’ feelings of efficacy do not appear to differ very much between schools, although many studies assumed that the greater part of variance in teacher efficacy could be found between schools. The socioeconomic composition of the school does not affect teacher efficacy. Gender composition, however, does influence teacher efficacy, as teachers display more efficacy in classroom management and experience more general efficacy when teaching mostly boys. The unexpected finding that teachers seem to feel more efficacious in classroom management when teaching mostly boys is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男生可以管理:学校的学生构成和教师效能,一个多层次的方法
关于教师效能感决定因素的大量研究都集中在教师的个体特征上。学校的特点,如学校的社会经济和性别构成,在很大程度上被忽视了。包括学校学生组成在内的少量研究表明,教师在教授社会经济地位较低的男孩(SES)时感觉效率较低。一项使用来自59所佛兰德中学1247名教师数据的多层次分析表明,教师的效能感在不同学校之间似乎没有太大差异,尽管许多研究认为教师效能感的大部分差异可能在不同学校之间发现。学校的社会经济成分并不影响教师效能感。然而,性别构成确实会影响教师效能感,教师在课堂管理中表现出更强的效能感,在以男生为主的教学中表现出更强的一般效能感。讨论了一个意想不到的发现,即当主要教授男孩时,教师似乎在课堂管理中感到更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Development
Teacher Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Teacher Development is a fully refereed international journal publishing articles on all aspects of teachers" professional development. It acts as a forum for critical and reflective attention to practice in teacher development and aims thereby to contribute to the quality of professional development. The journal takes a "whole-career" view of teacher development, and work from both international and inter-professional perspectives is welcome. Articles may deal with teacher development in varying political and professional contexts, and may be in a variety of styles, in keeping with the diversity of activity in professional development.
期刊最新文献
Teacher-tailored student evaluation of teaching as a formative lens for reflection on teaching: academics’ perspectives Navigating formative assessment as professional development in digital contexts: insights from teachers’ experiences Nature-based teacher education as beyond ‘getting outside:’ relational attunement, attending to the un-noticed, and ethical responsibility Exploring the varying agendas of principals, teachers, and a university related to mentorship Guided attention strategies for developing teacher sight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1