Group-Based Exercise as a Therapeutic Strategy for the Improvement of Mental Outcomes in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Patients in Low Resource Care Facilities

I. Shaw, Melany Cronje, B. Shaw
{"title":"Group-Based Exercise as a Therapeutic Strategy for the Improvement of Mental Outcomes in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Patients in Low Resource Care Facilities","authors":"I. Shaw, Melany Cronje, B. Shaw","doi":"10.5812/asjsm.106593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exercise is related to enhanced cognitive functioning and brain plasticity. Exercise might represent a potential adjunctive treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Furthermore, group exercise may prove especially useful due to its additional benefits. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effect of low-cost, group-based exercise on mental outcomes in patients with mild to moderate AD. Methods: Participants with mild to moderate AD were randomized to either a non-exercising control (CON) group or a group-exercise (GEX) group (n = 20 each). The GEX participated in eight weeks of three-times-weekly non-consecutive 45-minute sessions consisting of balance, resistance, aerobic, and flexibility exercises to determine their effect on mental outcomes, namely, cognitive function, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QOL). Results: The intervention program showed a significant (P ≤ 0.05) increase in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (P = 0.023). While the GEX were found to have no change in their (Alzheimer’s disease cooperative study activities of daily living) ADCS-ADL scores (P = 0.574). The CON demonstrated a significant, but deleterious 13.77% decrease in their ADCS-ADL scores from pre- to mid-test (P = 0.023) and from pre- to post-test (P = 0.038). Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease (QOL-AD) scores were unchanged in both the GEX and CON. Conclusions: Our results indicate that a low-cost, multidimensional group exercise intervention can positively influence cognitive function and improve patients with mild to moderate AD ability to perform ADLs.","PeriodicalId":8847,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.106593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise is related to enhanced cognitive functioning and brain plasticity. Exercise might represent a potential adjunctive treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Furthermore, group exercise may prove especially useful due to its additional benefits. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effect of low-cost, group-based exercise on mental outcomes in patients with mild to moderate AD. Methods: Participants with mild to moderate AD were randomized to either a non-exercising control (CON) group or a group-exercise (GEX) group (n = 20 each). The GEX participated in eight weeks of three-times-weekly non-consecutive 45-minute sessions consisting of balance, resistance, aerobic, and flexibility exercises to determine their effect on mental outcomes, namely, cognitive function, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QOL). Results: The intervention program showed a significant (P ≤ 0.05) increase in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (P = 0.023). While the GEX were found to have no change in their (Alzheimer’s disease cooperative study activities of daily living) ADCS-ADL scores (P = 0.574). The CON demonstrated a significant, but deleterious 13.77% decrease in their ADCS-ADL scores from pre- to mid-test (P = 0.023) and from pre- to post-test (P = 0.038). Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease (QOL-AD) scores were unchanged in both the GEX and CON. Conclusions: Our results indicate that a low-cost, multidimensional group exercise intervention can positively influence cognitive function and improve patients with mild to moderate AD ability to perform ADLs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以团体为基础的锻炼作为改善低资源护理机构中轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病患者心理结果的治疗策略
背景:运动与增强认知功能和大脑可塑性有关。运动可能是神经精神疾病的一种潜在的辅助治疗方法,如阿尔茨海默病(AD)。此外,团体锻炼可能因其额外的好处而被证明特别有用。目的:本研究旨在确定低成本、基于群体的运动对轻度至中度AD患者心理结果的影响。方法:轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病参与者被随机分为非运动对照组(CON)或团体运动组(GEX)(每组n=20)。GEX参加了为期八周、每周三次、非连续45分钟的训练,包括平衡、阻力、有氧和柔韧性训练,以确定它们对心理结果的影响,即认知功能、日常生活活动(ADL)和生活质量(QOL)。结果:干预方案显示迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评分显著(P≤0.05)增加(P=0.023)。而GEX的ADCS-ADL评分(阿尔茨海默病日常生活合作学习活动)没有变化(P=0.574),但从测试前到测试中(P=0.023)和从测试前和测试后(P=0.038),他们的ADCS-ADL评分下降了13.77%。生活质量阿尔茨海默病(QOL-AD)评分在GEX和CON中都没有变化。结论:我们的结果表明,多维团体运动干预可以积极影响认知功能,提高轻度至中度AD患者的日常生活能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Do Iranian Female Dancers Face a Risk of Chronic Negative Energy Balance? A Study on Energy Intake and Expenditure Among Non-professional Female Dancers Impact of Mar’ke Bilar Healthy Drink on Blood Levels of Malondialdehyde, Superoxide Dismutase, and Hemoglobin in Soccer Athletes at PPLP North Sumatra Dietary and Biological Assessment of Omega-3 Status in University Rugby Football Players: A Case-Control Study Dietary and Biological Assessment of Omega-3 Status in University Rugby Football Players: A Case-Control Study Quercetin Supplementation has no Synergetic Effect with High-Intensity Interval Training in Ameliorate Lipid Profile in Male Diabetic Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1