Comparative Study of RSA Asymmetric Algorithm and AES Algorithm for Data Security

Siti Alvi Sholikhatin, Adam Prayogo Kuncoro, Afifah Lutfia Munawaroh, Gilang Aji Setiawan
{"title":"Comparative Study of RSA Asymmetric Algorithm and AES Algorithm for Data Security","authors":"Siti Alvi Sholikhatin, Adam Prayogo Kuncoro, Afifah Lutfia Munawaroh, Gilang Aji Setiawan","doi":"10.15294/edukomputika.v9i1.57389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many ways to ensure data security, one of the classic way but still effective is to use encryption. Encryption itself has two techniques or algorithms: symmetric-key (also called secret-key) and asymmetric-key encryption (also called public key). In this paper, we proposed an analysis of two algorithm of encryption: RSA and AES algorithm in term of securing digital data. The method used in this research are: RSA and AES analysis, then retrieving the result. The two algorithm is deeply and thoroughly analyzed to discover the effectiveness to secure the data. The Technological Readiness Level (TKT) is at level 6, which means demonstration of a model or prototype or the analysis result of a system or subsystem or a study in a relevant environment. The result concluded that the application of the AES encryption algorithm is more optimal than RSA encryption in digital data security. Because the encryption and decryption process of using the AES algorithm is faster, although the difference in testing time of the two encryption algorithms is not too significant. The entropy value of 4.96 in AES encryption is greater than that of RSA proving that the even distribution of characters in the chiper text code does not accumulate on certain characters so that it will be difficult to attack using frequency analysis.","PeriodicalId":53354,"journal":{"name":"Edu Komputika Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edu Komputika Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/edukomputika.v9i1.57389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many ways to ensure data security, one of the classic way but still effective is to use encryption. Encryption itself has two techniques or algorithms: symmetric-key (also called secret-key) and asymmetric-key encryption (also called public key). In this paper, we proposed an analysis of two algorithm of encryption: RSA and AES algorithm in term of securing digital data. The method used in this research are: RSA and AES analysis, then retrieving the result. The two algorithm is deeply and thoroughly analyzed to discover the effectiveness to secure the data. The Technological Readiness Level (TKT) is at level 6, which means demonstration of a model or prototype or the analysis result of a system or subsystem or a study in a relevant environment. The result concluded that the application of the AES encryption algorithm is more optimal than RSA encryption in digital data security. Because the encryption and decryption process of using the AES algorithm is faster, although the difference in testing time of the two encryption algorithms is not too significant. The entropy value of 4.96 in AES encryption is greater than that of RSA proving that the even distribution of characters in the chiper text code does not accumulate on certain characters so that it will be difficult to attack using frequency analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RSA非对称算法与AES数据安全算法的比较研究
有很多方法可以确保数据安全,其中一种经典但仍然有效的方法是使用加密。加密本身有两种技术或算法:对称密钥(也称为密钥)和非对称密钥加密(也称为公钥)。本文从保护数字数据安全的角度,对RSA和AES两种加密算法进行了分析。本研究采用的方法是:RSA和AES分析,然后检索结果。对这两种算法进行了深入深入的分析,以发现数据安全的有效性。技术准备水平(TKT)为6级,这意味着在相关环境中演示模型或原型、系统或子系统的分析结果或研究。结果表明,在数字数据安全方面,AES加密算法的应用比RSA加密算法更为优化。因为使用AES算法的加密和解密过程更快,尽管两种加密算法在测试时间上的差异并不太大。AES加密中4.96的熵值大于RSA的熵值,证明芯片文本代码中字符的均匀分布不会累积在某些字符上,因此很难使用频率分析进行攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Kelayakan dan Efektivitas Sistem Administrasi Kurikulum Menggunakan Metode User Centered Design (UCD) di MAN 2 Banjarnegara Integrasi Technology Readiness dan Technology Acceptance Model untuk Analisis Kesiapan Pengguna Terhadap Penerimaan Aplikasi Parenting Penanganan Imbalanced Dataset untuk Klasifikasi Komentar Program Kampus Merdeka Pada Aplikasi Twitter Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning berbasis Media Sosial yang Berwawasan Lingkungan Pengembangan Game Math Story Problems Menggunakan RPG Maker MZ untuk Anak 4-7 Tahun
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1