Speech recognition, quality of hearing, and data logging statistics over time in adult cochlear implant users

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Indian Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_51_22
G. Malzanni, Caterina Lerda, R. Battista, Chiara Canova, O. Gatti, M. Bussi, L. Piccioni
{"title":"Speech recognition, quality of hearing, and data logging statistics over time in adult cochlear implant users","authors":"G. Malzanni, Caterina Lerda, R. Battista, Chiara Canova, O. Gatti, M. Bussi, L. Piccioni","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_51_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to examine improvement in speech recognition and “the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale” (SSQ) scores in monolateral cochlear implant (CI) users and its correlations to data logging statistics. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational, nonrandomized, study was conducted analyzing speech tracking with shielded mouth in noise (SMn), speech audiometry, and SSQ questionnaire (Italian version) at 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation of CI of 31 patients. The overall data of average daily use and acoustic scene analyses were extracted from data logging system. Data of 6-month cumulative speech in quiet-, speech-in-noise-, and noise-listening time of 19 patients were correlated to speech perception scores and SSQ scores. Results: An improvement was observed in all outcomes (speech tracking with SMn, speech audiometry, and SSQ scores). Listeners used their device on for a mean time of 13.45 h per day. Quiet scene was the most represented listening environment. A significant positive correlation was found between noise exposition (in hours) and hearing quality score of SSQ and between exposition to 60–69 dB noise and scores resulted from each part of SSQ. Discussion: The analysis failed to demonstrate a correlation between auditory performances and both exposition to speech scene and total exposition. However, time spent in noise using the device correlated with SSQ scores. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation ensures good results in speech recognition and quality of life, with progressive scores' improvement after activation. A predominant use in quiet was observed together with a correlation between hearing performance and exposition to noise.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"28 1","pages":"45 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_51_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine improvement in speech recognition and “the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale” (SSQ) scores in monolateral cochlear implant (CI) users and its correlations to data logging statistics. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational, nonrandomized, study was conducted analyzing speech tracking with shielded mouth in noise (SMn), speech audiometry, and SSQ questionnaire (Italian version) at 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation of CI of 31 patients. The overall data of average daily use and acoustic scene analyses were extracted from data logging system. Data of 6-month cumulative speech in quiet-, speech-in-noise-, and noise-listening time of 19 patients were correlated to speech perception scores and SSQ scores. Results: An improvement was observed in all outcomes (speech tracking with SMn, speech audiometry, and SSQ scores). Listeners used their device on for a mean time of 13.45 h per day. Quiet scene was the most represented listening environment. A significant positive correlation was found between noise exposition (in hours) and hearing quality score of SSQ and between exposition to 60–69 dB noise and scores resulted from each part of SSQ. Discussion: The analysis failed to demonstrate a correlation between auditory performances and both exposition to speech scene and total exposition. However, time spent in noise using the device correlated with SSQ scores. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation ensures good results in speech recognition and quality of life, with progressive scores' improvement after activation. A predominant use in quiet was observed together with a correlation between hearing performance and exposition to noise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人人工耳蜗使用者的语音识别、听力质量和随时间的数据记录统计
目的:本研究的目的是检验单侧人工耳蜗(CI)用户在语音识别和“语音、空间和听力质量量表”(SSQ)评分方面的改善及其与数据记录统计的相关性。材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性观察性非随机研究,分析了31名患者在CI激活后1、3和6个月使用屏蔽口噪声(SMn)进行的言语跟踪、言语测听和SSQ问卷(意大利版)。从数据记录系统中提取了平均日使用和声场景分析的总体数据。19名患者的6个月累计安静语音、噪声语音和噪声听音时间数据与语音感知得分和SSQ得分相关。结果:观察到所有结果(SMn语音跟踪、语音测听和SSQ评分)均有改善。听众平均每天使用设备13.45小时。安静的场景是最具代表性的聆听环境。噪声暴露(以小时为单位)与SSQ的听力质量分数之间存在显著的正相关,暴露于60–69 dB噪声与SSQ各部分的分数之间存在明显的正相关。讨论:该分析未能证明听觉表现与对演讲场景的阐述和全面阐述之间的相关性。然而,使用该设备在噪声中花费的时间与SSQ分数相关。结论:人工耳蜗植入能保证良好的语音识别效果和生活质量,激活后评分逐步提高。观察到安静的主要用途以及听力表现和暴露于噪音之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media Application of finite element model of middle ear in the study of the middle ear biomechanics in normal and diseased states Transmastoid titanium mesh assisted extra dural layered closure of tegmen defect: Case report in a 10 year old Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1