L’intelligence artificielle peut-elle aider à estimer le risque de récidive dans les comportements violents ?

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2020.02.001
Agathe Berly (psychiatre) , Cécile Manaouil (professeur de médecine légale) , Alain Dervaux (professeur en psychiatrie)
{"title":"L’intelligence artificielle peut-elle aider à estimer le risque de récidive dans les comportements violents ?","authors":"Agathe Berly (psychiatre) ,&nbsp;Cécile Manaouil (professeur de médecine légale) ,&nbsp;Alain Dervaux (professeur en psychiatrie)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2020.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In forensic psychiatry, magistrates raise the question of the existence of a risk of recidivism and dangerousness to psychiatric experts. Follow-up studies in forensic psychiatry showed that the psychiatric elements predictive of recidivism were mainly related to serious mental illnesses, toxic consumption, addictions, high levels of impulsivity, low insight, associated personality disorders, in particular antisocial personality disorders. There are also protective factors, in particular the observance of treatments. Given the complexity of psychiatric and criminological risk factors and protection, can artificial intelligence (AI) help psychiatrists and magistrates to improve the predictivity of recidivism?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic review of the literature on AI applications in the prediction of recidivism in forensic psychiatry, conducted according to PRISMA criteria, using the: “Artificial Intelligence”, “Recidivism”, “Personality Disorder”, “Impulsive” Behavior”, “Alcohol abuse”, “Drug Abuse”, “Schizophrenia”, “Bipolar disorder” on the PubMed, Science Direct, Clinical Trial and Google Scholar databases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The vast majority of studies come from legal or computer reviews and very few from medical databases. The studies evaluating the AI in Forensic Psychiatry most often used Machine Learning based on sociodemographic, sociological and criminological data, notably the age of the first offense and the number of previous convictions. To date, there are very few studies evaluating psychiatric parameters, focusing on psychopathic personality disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/conclusion</h3><p>The applications of the AI in Forensic Psychiatry are still very premature. However, some psychiatric criteria should be more prominent in this field, especially those from Webster's HCR-20 and Hare PCL-R scales. The challenge will also be to find relevant behavioral, psychological and psychiatric keywords to include in AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2020 163","pages":"Pages 105-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.meddro.2020.02.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S124673912030018X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In forensic psychiatry, magistrates raise the question of the existence of a risk of recidivism and dangerousness to psychiatric experts. Follow-up studies in forensic psychiatry showed that the psychiatric elements predictive of recidivism were mainly related to serious mental illnesses, toxic consumption, addictions, high levels of impulsivity, low insight, associated personality disorders, in particular antisocial personality disorders. There are also protective factors, in particular the observance of treatments. Given the complexity of psychiatric and criminological risk factors and protection, can artificial intelligence (AI) help psychiatrists and magistrates to improve the predictivity of recidivism?

Methods

Systematic review of the literature on AI applications in the prediction of recidivism in forensic psychiatry, conducted according to PRISMA criteria, using the: “Artificial Intelligence”, “Recidivism”, “Personality Disorder”, “Impulsive” Behavior”, “Alcohol abuse”, “Drug Abuse”, “Schizophrenia”, “Bipolar disorder” on the PubMed, Science Direct, Clinical Trial and Google Scholar databases.

Results

The vast majority of studies come from legal or computer reviews and very few from medical databases. The studies evaluating the AI in Forensic Psychiatry most often used Machine Learning based on sociodemographic, sociological and criminological data, notably the age of the first offense and the number of previous convictions. To date, there are very few studies evaluating psychiatric parameters, focusing on psychopathic personality disorders.

Discussion/conclusion

The applications of the AI in Forensic Psychiatry are still very premature. However, some psychiatric criteria should be more prominent in this field, especially those from Webster's HCR-20 and Hare PCL-R scales. The challenge will also be to find relevant behavioral, psychological and psychiatric keywords to include in AI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能能帮助评估暴力行为再次发生的风险吗?
在法医精神病学方面,地方法官提出了存在再犯风险和对精神病学专家构成危险的问题。司法精神病学的随访研究表明,预测再犯的精神病学因素主要与严重精神疾病、中毒、成瘾、高度冲动、低洞察力、相关人格障碍,特别是反社会人格障碍有关。也有保护因素,特别是遵守治疗。鉴于精神病学和犯罪学风险因素和保护的复杂性,人工智能(AI)能否帮助精神科医生和地方法官提高再犯的预见性?方法采用PubMed、Science Direct、Clinical Trial和谷歌Scholar数据库中的“人工智能”、“累犯”、“人格障碍”、“冲动行为”、“酒精滥用”、“药物滥用”、“精神分裂症”、“双相情感障碍”等数据库,按照PRISMA标准对人工智能在法医精神病学累犯预测中的应用文献进行系统综述。结果绝大多数研究来自法律或计算机评论,很少来自医学数据库。评估法医精神病学中人工智能的研究最常使用基于社会人口学、社会学和犯罪学数据的机器学习,特别是首次犯罪的年龄和先前定罪的数量。迄今为止,评估精神病学参数的研究很少,主要集中在精神病性人格障碍上。讨论/结论人工智能在法医精神病学中的应用还很不成熟。然而,一些精神病学的标准在这一领域应该更加突出,特别是来自韦氏HCR-20和Hare PCL-R量表的标准。我们面临的挑战还在于找到相关的行为、心理学和精神病学关键词,并将其纳入人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Parcours de soins rénové, e-santé et maillage officinal : une réponse complexe à la pénurie de médecins Le concept de race : serpent de mer de la pratique médicale La loi du 10 mai 2024 contre les dérives sectaires : application dans le domaine de la santé : séparer le bon grain scientifique de l’ivraie charlatanesque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1