Metacognitive Inoculation Reduces the Persuasiveness of Sarcastic Attack Messages

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication Reports Pub Date : 2020-04-22 DOI:10.1080/08934215.2020.1755876
Lauren Clyne, Michael Fellers, A. Richards
{"title":"Metacognitive Inoculation Reduces the Persuasiveness of Sarcastic Attack Messages","authors":"Lauren Clyne, Michael Fellers, A. Richards","doi":"10.1080/08934215.2020.1755876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the ability of metacognitive inoculation to confer resistance to sarcastic persuasive messages. We expected that sarcasm in an attack message would be more persuasive for inoculation and control treatments compared to an inoculation containing a forewarning of sarcasm’s psychological function. A 3 (inoculation: traditional, metacognitive, control) × 2 (attack: sarcastic, literal) experiment was conducted whereby participants were inoculated and then listened to a message advocating for college exit exams. Our prediction was supported, demonstrating that metacognitive inoculation about persuasive tactics, like sarcasm, can reduce the success of such strategies.","PeriodicalId":45913,"journal":{"name":"Communication Reports","volume":"33 1","pages":"68 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08934215.2020.1755876","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1755876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examined the ability of metacognitive inoculation to confer resistance to sarcastic persuasive messages. We expected that sarcasm in an attack message would be more persuasive for inoculation and control treatments compared to an inoculation containing a forewarning of sarcasm’s psychological function. A 3 (inoculation: traditional, metacognitive, control) × 2 (attack: sarcastic, literal) experiment was conducted whereby participants were inoculated and then listened to a message advocating for college exit exams. Our prediction was supported, demonstrating that metacognitive inoculation about persuasive tactics, like sarcasm, can reduce the success of such strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元认知接种降低讽刺攻击信息的说服力
这项研究考察了元认知接种对讽刺性说服信息的抵抗力。我们预计,与包含讽刺心理功能预警的接种相比,攻击信息中的讽刺对接种和控制治疗更有说服力。进行了一项3(接种:传统的、元认知的、对照的)×2(攻击:讽刺的、字面的)实验,参与者接种疫苗,然后听一条倡导大学毕业考试的信息。我们的预测得到了支持,表明对讽刺等说服策略的元认知接种会降低这些策略的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Reports
Communication Reports COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Communication Reports (CR), published biannually since 1988, is one of two scholarly journals of the Western States Communication Association (WSCA). The journal publishes original manuscripts that are short, data/text-based, and related to the broadly defined field of human communication. The mission of the journal is to showcase exemplary scholarship without censorship based on topics, methods, or analytical tools. Articles that are purely speculative or theoretical, and not data analytic, are not appropriate for this journal. Authors are expected to devote a substantial portion of the manuscript to analyzing and reporting research data.
期刊最新文献
Information Work with Friends Experiencing an Intimate Health Concern We’re Going Streaking!: Associations Between the Gamification of Mediated Communication and Relational Closeness Promoting the Use of Electric Vehicles on Social Media: The Effects of Message Framing, Point of Reference, and Political Affiliation on Perceived Information Value for Others and Purchase Intentions Disclosing Bipolar Disorder in Romantic Relationships Testing the Mercator Effect: Global Map Projections Persuade Differently According to the Emphasis Frames Used to Contextualize Them
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1